Two experiments compared the perception of apparent movement when the second of two successive stimuli always appeared in the same position and when it varied randomly between two spatial positions. The results of both experiments showed that foreknowledge of the position of the second stimulus does not facilitate the perception of apparent movement. Experiment 2 also clearly showed that the space-time relationships of Korte’s third law of apparent movement does not depend on foreknowledge of the position of the second stimulus. These findings imply that apparent movement in real time occurs after the second stimulus has been registered by the visual system. It suggests that apparent movement involves a delayed decision mechanism that stores the first stimulus, the interstimulus temporal interval, and the second stimulus, and then impletes a motion compatible with the stimulus information.
[1]
H. Barlow,et al.
The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina.
,
1965,
The Journal of physiology.
[2]
P A Kolers,et al.
Figural change in apparent motion.
,
1971,
Journal of experimental psychology.
[3]
F. Attneave,et al.
Apparent movement in tridimensional space
,
1973
.
[4]
J. Beck,et al.
An aftereffect to discrete stimuli producing apparent movement and succession
,
1972
.
[5]
W. Neff.
A Critical Investigation of the Visual Apprehension of Movement
,
1936
.
[6]
I. Rock,et al.
Stroboscopic Movement Based on Perceptual Intelligence
,
1974,
Perception.