Characterization of Effective Parameters in Abrasive Waterjet Rock Cutting

The rock cutting performance of an abrasive waterjet is affected by various parameters. In this study, rock cutting tests are conducted with different energy (i.e., water pressure, traverse speed, and abrasive feed rate), geometry (i.e., standoff distance), and material parameters [i.e., uniaxial compressive strength (UCS)]. In particular, experimental tests are carried out at a long standoff distance (up to 60 cm) to consider field application. The effective parameters of the rock cutting process are identified based on the relationships between the cutting performance indices (depth, width, and volume) and parameters. In addition, the cutting efficiency is analyzed with effective parameters as well as different pump types and the number of cutting passes considering the concept of kinetic jet energy. Efficiency analysis reveals that the cutting depth efficiency tends to increase with an increase in the water pressure and traverse speed and with a decrease in the standoff distance and UCS. Cutting volume efficiency strongly depends on standoff distance. High efficiency of cutting volume is obtained at a long standoff distance regardless of the pump type. The efficiency analysis provides a realistic way to optimize parameters for abrasive waterjet rock excavation.

[1]  Patrick E. Grattan-Bellew,et al.  Influence of physical properties of rock on rate of penetration of a water-jet drill , 1986 .

[2]  I. Finnie.  Erosion of surfaces by solid particles , 1960 .

[3]  Jae-Joon Song,et al.  Slotting of concrete and rock using an abrasive suspension waterjet system , 2012 .

[4]  N. Abriak,et al.  Theoretical analysis of the particle acceleration process in abrasive water jet cutting , 1996 .

[5]  R. Kovacevic,et al.  Test parameter analysis in abrasive water jet cutting of rocklike materials , 1997 .

[6]  Andreas W. Momber,et al.  Energy transfer during the mixing of air and solid particles into a high-speed waterjet : an impact-force study , 2001 .

[7]  Niu Jilei,et al.  The Productivity-Enhancing Technique of Deep Penetrating Perforation With a High-Pressure Water Jet , 2007 .

[8]  G. Rehbinder.  Slot cutting in rock with a high speed water jet , 1977 .

[9]  Andreas W. Momber,et al.  Wear of rocks by water flow , 2004 .

[10]  G. Galecki,et al.  ENERGY BASED MODELLING OF ABRASIVE SLURRY JET , 2007 .

[11]  Gokhan Aydin,et al.  Prediction of the Cut Depth of Granitic Rocks Machined by Abrasive Waterjet (AWJ) , 2012, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[12]  E. T. Brown,et al.  Rock characterization testing and monitoring , 1981 .

[13]  Radovan Kovacevic,et al.  Principles of Abrasive Water Jet Machining , 2012 .

[14]  Gokhan Aydin,et al.  An Experimental Study on the Depth of Cut of Granite in Abrasive Waterjet Cutting , 2012 .

[15]  M. Hashish.  A Modeling Study of Metal Cutting With Abrasive Waterjets , 1984 .

[16]  Jun Wang,et al.  A Predictive Depth of Penetration Model for Abrasive Waterjet Cutting of Polymer Matrix Composites , 2002 .

[17]  Thomas J. Kim,et al.  An erosion model of polycrystalline ceramics in abrasive waterjet cutting , 1996 .

[18]  R. Teale.  The concept of specific energy in rock drilling , 1965 .