Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Prospective Observational Real-World Data

Abstract Introduction There is a lacuna of prospective studies on soft tissue sarcoma (STS) from the Indian subcontinent in published literature. Objectives We conducted this study to describe the clinical profile and outcomes of STS in North India. Materials and Methods This is a single-center, prospective, observational study conducted from October 2017 to September 2019. All consecutive patients aged ≥18 years with histopathological diagnosis of STS were enrolled. The study end points included overall response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results A total of 140 patients were included with a median duration of follow-up of 14 months (range: 1–25 months). The median age of patients was 45 years. The median duration of symptoms before diagnosis was 5 months (range: 1–18 months). The most common histopathologic subtype was undifferentiated pleomorphic STS (22%). Of 105 localized patients, 21 received neoadjuvant therapy with external beam radiotherapy and/or doxorubicin-based chemotherapy and reported partial response in 38% (8/21) of the patients; the remaining 62% (13/21) of the patients had stable disease. Neoadjuvant therapy resulted in nonsignificantly higher complete resection rates with relative risk of 2.37 (p = 0.19). Of the remaining 35 metastatic STS patients, 31 received chemotherapy and reported partial response in 39.1% (n = 9/23), stable disease in 30.4% (n = 7/23), and disease progression in 30.4% (n = 7/23) of the patients. For localized STS patients, 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) and OS rates were 87.6 ±3.5 and 95.3 ± 2.3%, respectively. The median OS for metastatic STS patients was 23.90 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.43–40.36). Among metastatic STS, median OS was not reached for those who underwent curative resection versus 12.66 months (95% CI: 9.28–16.04) for those who received systemic therapy alone. Conclusion Median age of 45 years is a decade earlier than seen in the Western population. Neoadjuvant therapy improved complete resection rates, though it was statistically nonsignificant. Curative resection among metastatic STS patients improves survival.

[1]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2020 , 2020, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[2]  Atul Sharma,et al.  Outcomes of advanced soft tissue sarcoma from dedicated medical oncology sarcoma clinic in North India and evaluation of the respective model. , 2018 .

[3]  S. Candrilli,et al.  Epidemiology of Adult Soft-Tissue Sarcomas in Germany , 2018, Sarcoma.

[4]  S. Saini,et al.  Retrospective Analysis of Spectrum of Presentation and Treatment Outcome in Extremity Sarcomas: A Single-Centre Experience , 2018, Sarcoma.

[5]  A. Puri,et al.  Analysis of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas registered during the year 2012 at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, with clinical outcomes. , 2018, Indian Journal of Cancer.

[6]  J. Blay,et al.  Patterns of care and outcomes of patients with METAstatic soft tissue SARComa in a real-life setting: the METASARC observational study , 2017, BMC Medicine.

[7]  A. Puri,et al.  Histopathologic review of 400 biopsies and resection specimens of trunk and extremity-based soft tissue tumors. , 2017, Indian Journal of Cancer.

[8]  J. Werner,et al.  External Beam Radiation Therapy for Resectable Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2017, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[9]  S. Mehta,et al.  Prognostic Factors in Indian Patients Operated for Soft Tissue Sarcomas—a Retrospective Cross-sectional Analysis , 2017, Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  I. Judson,et al.  UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas , 2016, Clinical Sarcoma Research.

[11]  J. Hui Epidemiology and Etiology of Sarcomas. , 2016, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[12]  F. Chibon,et al.  Clinical effect of molecular methods in sarcoma diagnosis (GENSARC): a prospective, multicentre, observational study. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  S. Bonvalot,et al.  Soft tissue sarcoma in France in 2015: Epidemiology, classification and organization of clinical care. , 2015, Journal of visceral surgery.

[14]  R. Grimer,et al.  One-year mortality in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas as an indicator of delay in presentation. , 2015, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[15]  K. S. Hall,et al.  Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  Clara C. Chen,et al.  Epidemiology, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes of Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma in a Community-Based Oncology Network , 2014, Sarcoma.

[17]  C. Fletcher,et al.  WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone , 2013 .

[18]  R. Grimer,et al.  Early symptoms of bone and soft tissue sarcomas: could they be diagnosed earlier? , 2012, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[19]  J. Schiffman,et al.  The Epidemiology of Sarcoma , 2012, Clinical Sarcoma Research.

[20]  Andrea Ferrari,et al.  Soft tissue sarcoma across the age spectrum: A population‐based study from the surveillance epidemiology and end results database , 2011, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[21]  N. Shukla,et al.  Soft Tissue Sarcoma—Review of Experience at a Tertiary Care Cancer Centre , 2011, Indian journal of surgical oncology.

[22]  D. Ettinger,et al.  Long‐term results of a phase 2 study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the management of high‐risk, high‐grade, soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and body wall , 2010, Cancer.

[23]  A. Gupta,et al.  The incidence of soft tissue sarcoma in Dakshina Kannada: study in a District Government Hospital , 2009, The Indian journal of surgery.

[24]  F. Farrokhyar,et al.  A systematic meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized resectable soft‐tissue sarcoma , 2008, Cancer.

[25]  R. Bold,et al.  Racial and ethnic differences in treatment and survival among adults with primary extremity soft‐tissue sarcoma , 2008, Cancer.

[26]  B. Owens,et al.  Preoperative versus postoperative radiation therapy for soft-tissue sarcomas. , 2005, American journal of orthopedics.

[27]  C. Compton,et al.  AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.

[28]  A. Rydholm,et al.  Clinicopathologic re-evaluation of 100 malignant fibrous histiocytomas: prognostic relevance of subclassification. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  F. Collin,et al.  Predictive value of grade for metastasis development in the main histologic types of adult soft tissue sarcomas , 2001, Cancer.

[30]  F. Collin,et al.  Comparative study of the National Cancer Institute and French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group grading systems in a population of 410 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  O. S. Nielsen,et al.  Surgical treatment of lung metastases: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer‐Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group study of 255 patients , 1996, Cancer.

[32]  J. Coindre,et al.  Soft‐tissue sarcomas of adults; study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathological grading system , 1984, International journal of cancer.

[33]  George D. Langham A "Memorial" Hospital , 1919, The Hospital.