Semantic congruity affects numerical judgments similarly in monkeys and humans.

Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were trained to order visual arrays based on their number of elements and to conditionally choose the array with the larger or smaller number of elements dependent on a color cue. When the screen background was red, monkeys were reinforced for choosing the smaller numerical value first. When the screen background was blue, monkeys were reinforced for choosing the larger numerical value first. Monkeys showed a semantic congruity effect analogous to that reported for human comparison judgments. Specifically, decision time was systematically influenced by the semantic congruity between the cue ("choose smaller" or "choose larger") and the magnitude of the choice stimuli (small or large numbers of dots). This finding demonstrates a semantic congruity effect in a nonlinguistic animal and provides strong evidence for an evolutionarily primitive magnitude-comparison algorithm common to humans and monkeys.

[1]  M. C. Smith,et al.  Tracing the time course of picture--word processing. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  D. A. Cruse.  Three classes of antonym in English , 1976 .

[3]  M. Beran.  Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[4]  P. Gordon.  Numerical Cognition Without Words: Evidence from Amazonia , 2004, Science.

[5]  R. J. Audley,et al.  Response instructions and the speed of relative judgements: I. Some experiments on brightness discrimination. , 1964 .

[6]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation , 1999 .

[7]  W. Petrusic,et al.  Semantic congruity effects and theories of the comparison process. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[9]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[10]  IS CONGRUITY DUE TO ENCODING , 1995 .

[11]  W. Banks,et al.  Semantic and perceptual processes in symbolic comparisons. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  J. Baranski,et al.  Similarity comparisons with remembered and perceived magnitudes: Memory psychophysics and fundamental measurement , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Keith J Holyoak,et al.  Comparative judgments with numerical reference points , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  H S Terrace,et al.  Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. , 1998, Science.

[15]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: Evidence from the Stroop effect , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[16]  D. Gentner,et al.  Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought , 2003 .

[17]  R. Moyer,et al.  Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  E. Spelke,et al.  The construction of large number representations in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[19]  Keith Allan,et al.  INTERPRETING ENGLISH COMPARATIVES , 1986 .

[20]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[21]  W. Banks,et al.  Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgments of magnitudes of digits. , 1976 .

[22]  Wesley A. Mah,et al.  Cognitive reference points in judgments of symbolic magnitude , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  S. Sternberg.  Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. , 1969, American scientist.

[25]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Language and the Origin of Numerical Concepts , 2004, Science.

[26]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. , 1969 .

[27]  Paul B. Buckley,et al.  Comparisons of digits and dot patterns. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  Subjective Magnitude Information in Semantic Orderings. , 1976 .