Comparing Energy-Saving MAC Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks

Applications for wireless sensor networks have notably different characteristics and requirements from standard WLAN applications. Low energy consumption is the most important consideration. The low message rate that is typical for sensor network applications and the relaxed latency requirements allow for significant reductions in energy consumption of the radio. In this article we study the energy saved by two MAC protocols optimized for wireless sensor networks, S-MAC and T-MAC, in comparison to standard CSMA/CA, We also report on the effects of low-power listening, a physical layer optimization, in combination with these MAC protocols. The comparison is based on extensive simulation driven by traffic that varies over time and location; sensor nodes are inactive unless they observe some physical event, or send status updates to the sink node providing the connection to the wired world. T-MAC} in combination with low-power listening saves most energy, but can not handle the same peak loads as CSMA/CA and S-MAC.

[1]  V. Bharghavan,et al.  MACAW: A media access protocol for wireless LANs , 1994 .

[2]  A. M. Abdullah,et al.  Wireless lan medium access control (mac) and physical layer (phy) specifications , 1997 .

[3]  Suresh Singh,et al.  PAMAS—power aware multi-access protocol with signalling for ad hoc networks , 1998, CCRV.

[4]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Next Century Challenges: Mobile Networking for Smart Dust , 1999, MobiCom 1999.

[5]  Thomas de Quincey [C] , 2000, The Works of Thomas De Quincey, Vol. 1: Writings, 1799–1820.

[6]  Hendrik Van Landeghem,et al.  Robust planning: a new paradigm for Supply Chain Planning , 2001 .

[7]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[8]  Yu-Chee Tseng,et al.  Power-saving protocols for IEEE 802.11-based multi-hop ad hoc networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[9]  John Anderson,et al.  Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring , 2002, WSNA '02.

[10]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Sensor Networks , 2002, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[11]  David E. Culler,et al.  Mica: A Wireless Platform for Deeply Embedded Networks , 2002, IEEE Micro.

[12]  A. Varga,et al.  THE OMNET++ DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION SYSTEM , 2003 .

[13]  Koen Langendoen,et al.  An adaptive energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[14]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Medium access control with coordinated adaptive sleeping for wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.