The Rasch Model from the Perspective of the Representational Theory of Measurement

Representational measurement theory is the dominant theory of measurement within the philosophy of science; and the area in which the theory of conjoint measurement was developed. For many years it has been argued the Rasch model is conjoint measurement by several psychometricians. This paper critiques this argument from the perspective of representational measurement theory. It concludes that the Rasch model is not conjoint measurement as the model does not demonstrate the existence of a representation theorem between an empirical relational structure and a numerical relational structure. Psychologists seriously interested in investigating traits for quantitative structure should use the theory of conjoint measurement itself rather than the Rasch model. This is not to say, however, that empirical relationships between conjoint measurement and the Rasch model are precluded. The paper concludes by suggesting some relevant research avenues.

[1]  S. Sireci.  Book Review: The New Rules of Measurement: What Every Psychologist and Educator Should Know , 2000 .

[2]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  Five decades of item response modelling , 1989 .

[3]  Howard Wainer,et al.  The Rasch Model as Additive Conjoint Measurement , 1979 .

[4]  Philip J. Davis,et al.  The Mathematical Experience , 1982 .

[5]  Benjamin D. Wright,et al.  Comparing Rasch measurement and factor analysis , 1996 .

[6]  P. Maddy.  Some Naturalistic Reflections on Set Theoretic Method , 2001 .

[7]  D. Borsboom,et al.  The Theoretical Status of Latent Variables , 2003 .

[8]  Gianluigi Oliveri,et al.  Mathematics. A Science of Patterns? , 1997, Synthese.

[9]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Several unresolved conceptual problems of mathematical psychology , 1997 .

[10]  M. R. Espejo.  Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences , 2004 .

[11]  Brent Mundy,et al.  Embedding and uniqueness in relational theories of space , 1986, Synthese.

[12]  Faithful representation, physical extensive measurement theory and Archimedean axioms , 1987, Synthese.

[13]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Representational Measurement Theory , 2002 .

[14]  C. Luther,et al.  INDEPENDENCE OF THE CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS , 2009 .

[15]  J. Krivine,et al.  Introduction to Axiomatic Set Theory , 1971 .

[16]  George Karabatsos,et al.  Bayesian nonparametric model selection and model testing , 2006 .

[17]  George Karabatsos,et al.  Enumerating and testing conjoint measurement models , 2002, Mathematical Social Sciences.

[18]  Clark,et al.  The Measurement of Qualitative Probability. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[19]  N. Cliff.  Article Commentary: Abstract Measurement Theory and the Revolution that Never Happened , 1992 .

[20]  Louis Narens,et al.  A meaningful justification for the representational theory of measurement , 2002 .

[21]  George Karabatsos,et al.  Comparing the Aberrant Response Detection Performance of Thirty-Six Person-Fit Statistics , 2003 .

[22]  J. Leeuw,et al.  Abstract Measurement Theory. , 1986 .

[23]  Adolfo García de la Sienra,et al.  A Metaphysics of Quantity , 1990 .

[24]  B. D. Finetti,et al.  Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources , 1992 .

[25]  Michell,et al.  The Axioms of Quantity and the Theory of Measurement , 1997, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[26]  Joel Michell,et al.  Normal Science, Pathological Science and Psychometrics , 2000 .

[27]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Foundations of Measurement, Vol. II: Geometrical, Threshold, and Probabilistic Representations , 1989 .

[28]  D. Scott.  Measurement structures and linear inequalities , 1964 .

[29]  Joel Michell,et al.  Measurement: a beginner's guide. , 2003, Journal of applied measurement.

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I: Additive and Polynomial Representations , 1991 .

[31]  Melvin R. Novick,et al.  Some latent train models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability , 1966 .

[32]  Jules L. Ellis,et al.  Local homogeneity in latent trait models. A characterization of the homogeneous monotone irt model , 1993 .

[33]  F. Lord.  Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems , 1980 .

[34]  George Karabatsos,et al.  Order-Constrained Bayes Inference for Dichotomous Models of Unidimensional Nonparametric IRT , 2004 .

[35]  R. Luce,et al.  Measurement analogies: comparisons of behavioral and physical measures* , 2004 .

[36]  R. Luce,et al.  Further Comments on the “Nonrevolution” Arising From Axiomatic Measurement Theory , 1993 .

[37]  A. Tversky,et al.  Foundations of Measurement, Vol. III: Representation, Axiomatization, and Invariance , 1990 .

[38]  R. Luce.  Sufficient Conditions for the Existence of a Finitely Additive Probability Measure , 1967 .

[39]  S. Shapiro.  Philosophy of mathematics : structure and ontology , 1997 .

[40]  Georg Rasch,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests , 1981, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[41]  J. Michell.  Item Response Models, Pathological Science and the Shape of Error , 2004 .

[42]  Jean-Baptiste Lully,et al.  The collected works , 1996 .

[43]  Michell,et al.  The Axioms of Quantity and the Theory of Measurement , 1996, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[44]  George Karabatsos,et al.  The exchangeable multinomial model as an approach to testing deterministic axioms of choice and measurement , 2005 .

[45]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Dimensionally Invariant Numerical Laws Correspond to Meaningful Qualitative Relations , 1978, Philosophy of Science.

[46]  C. Swoyer.  Structural representation and surrogative reasoning , 1991, Synthese.

[47]  Paul T. Barrett,et al.  Beyond psychometrics: Measurement, non‐quantitative structure, and applied numerics , 2003 .

[48]  Gerhard H. Fischer,et al.  Derivations of the Rasch Model , 1995 .

[49]  D. Borsboom,et al.  Why Psychometrics is Not Pathological , 2004 .

[50]  H. Scheiblechner.  Additive conjoint isotonic probabilistic models (ADISOP) , 1999 .

[51]  K. Green.  Fundamental Measurement: A Review and Application of Additive Conjoint Measurement in Educational Testing , 1986 .

[52]  K. Schwager,et al.  The representational theory of measurement: An assessment. , 1991 .

[53]  G. Karabatsos,et al.  The Rasch model, additive conjoint measurement, and new models of probabilistic measurement theory. , 2001, Journal of applied measurement.

[54]  E. Andrade,et al.  Physics: The Elements , 1921, Nature.

[55]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Uniqueness and homogeneity of ordered relational structures , 1986 .

[56]  G. Rasch,et al.  On Specific Objectivity. An Attempt at Formalizing the Request for Generality and Validity of Scientific Statements in Symposium on Scientific Objectivity, Vedbaek, Mau 14-16, 1976. , 1977 .

[57]  Hubert E. Brogden,et al.  The rasch model, the law of comparative judgment and additive conjoint measurement , 1977 .

[58]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Finite linear qualitative probability , 1996 .

[59]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Handbook of experimental psychology , 1951 .

[60]  R. Wood,et al.  Fitting the Rasch model—A heady tale , 1978 .

[61]  R. Luce,et al.  Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement , 1964 .

[62]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Measurement structures with archimedean ordered translation groups , 1987 .

[63]  Wolfgang Balzer,et al.  The structuralist view of measurement: an extension of received measurement theories , 1992 .

[64]  Jean-Claude Falmagne,et al.  Statistical issues in measurement , 1985 .

[65]  G Karabatsos.  A critique of Rasch residual fit statistics. , 2000, Journal of applied measurement.

[66]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Similar Systems and Dimensionally Invariant Laws , 1971, Philosophy of Science.

[67]  W. Fisher.  Mathematics, Measurement, Metaphor and Metaphysics II , 2003 .

[68]  G. Goude,et al.  On fundamental measurement in psychology , 1962 .

[69]  C. Kraft,et al.  Intuitive Probability on Finite Sets , 1959 .

[70]  Marston Conder,et al.  A counterexample to Fishburn's conjecture on finite linear qualitative probability , 2004 .

[71]  P. Suppes,et al.  The definability of the qualitative independence of events in terms of extended indicator functions , 1994 .

[72]  P. Kline.  The New Psychometrics: Science, Psychology and Measurement , 1998 .

[73]  P. Fayers.  Item Response Theory for Psychologists , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[74]  B. Junker,et al.  Nonparametric Item Response Theory in Action: An Overview of the Special Issue , 2001 .

[75]  J. Keats,et al.  Test theory. , 1967, Annual review of psychology.

[76]  J. Falmagne.  On a class of probabilistic conjoint measurement models: Some diagnostic properties☆ , 1979 .

[77]  Paul Jansen,et al.  A New Derivation of the Rasch Model , 1984 .