Effective connectivity analysis of default mode network based on the Bayesian network learning approach

This work proposed to use the linear Gaussian Bayesian network (BN) to construct the effective connectivity model of the brain's default mode network (DMN), a set of regions characterized by more increased neural activity during rest-state than most goal-oriented tasks. In a complete unsupervised data-driven manner, Bayesian information criterion (BIC) based learning approach was utilized to identify a highest scored network whose nodes (brain regions) were selected based on the result from the group independent component analysis (Group ICA) examining the DMN. We put forward to adopt the statistical significance testing method for regression coefficients used in stepwise regression analysis to further refine the network identified by BIC. The final established BN, learned from the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data acquired from 12 healthy young subjects during rest-state, revealed that the hippocampus (HC) was the most influential brain region that affected activities in all other regions included in the BN. In contrast, the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) was influenced by other regions, but had no reciprocal effects on any other region. Overall, the configuration of our BN illustrated that a prominent connection from HC to PCC existed in the DMN.

[1]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  M. Greicius,et al.  Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from healthy aging: Evidence from functional MRI , 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[3]  B. Mazoyer,et al.  Cortical networks for working memory and executive functions sustain the conscious resting state in man , 2001, Brain Research Bulletin.

[4]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Altered resting state networks in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease: An fMRI study , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[5]  Zucchini,et al.  An Introduction to Model Selection. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[6]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Corticolimbic Interactions Associated with Performance on a Short-Term Memory Task Are Modified by Age , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  H. Braak,et al.  Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes , 2004, Acta Neuropathologica.

[9]  M. Allen Understanding Regression Analysis , 1997 .

[10]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Changes in limbic and prefrontal functional interactions in a working memory task for faces. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Tianzi Jiang,et al.  Changes in hippocampal connectivity in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease: Evidence from resting state fMRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[14]  David Heckerman,et al.  A Tutorial on Learning with Bayesian Networks , 1999, Innovations in Bayesian Networks.

[15]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Jagath C. Rajapakse,et al.  Learning functional structure from fMR images , 2006, NeuroImage.

[17]  B L Holman,et al.  Preclinical prediction of Alzheimer's disease using SPECT , 1998, Neurology.

[18]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M. Raichle,et al.  Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  David Heckerman,et al.  Learning Gaussian Networks , 1994, UAI.

[21]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A default mode of brain function: A brief history of an evolving idea , 2007, NeuroImage.

[22]  Michael I. Jordan Learning in Graphical Models , 1999, NATO ASI Series.

[23]  B. Levine,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of autobiographical memory: A meta-analysis , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  fMRI resting state networks define distinct modes of long-distance interactions in the human brain , 2006, NeuroImage.

[25]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Bayesian Network Classifiers , 1997, Machine Learning.

[26]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[28]  E. Stein,et al.  Cingulate activation increases dynamically with response speed under stimulus unpredictability. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Sourabh Bhattacharya,et al.  A Bayesian approach to modeling dynamic effective connectivity with fMRI data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[30]  Richard Scheines,et al.  Causation, Prediction, and Search, Second Edition , 2000, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[31]  J. Rissanen,et al.  Modeling By Shortest Data Description* , 1978, Autom..

[32]  J. Pekar,et al.  fMRI Activation in a Visual-Perception Task: Network of Areas Detected Using the General Linear Model and Independent Components Analysis , 2001, NeuroImage.

[33]  Karl J. Friston Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .