EGFR tyrosine kinase mutation testing in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND Non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) tumours with activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (efgr) tyrosine kinase are highly sensitized to the effects of oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib and erlotinib, suggesting the possibility of targeted treatment of nsclc based on EFGR mutation status. However, no standardized method exists for assessing the EGFR mutation status of tumours. Also, it is not known if available methods are feasible for routine screening. To address that question, we conducted a validation study of methods used for detecting EGFR mutations in exons 19 and 21 at molecular laboratories located in five specialized Canadian cancer centres. METHODS The screening methods were first optimized using cell lines harbouring the mutations in question. A validation phase using anonymized patient samples followed. RESULTS The methods used at the sites were highly specific and sensitive in detecting both mutations in cell-line dna (specificity of 100% and sensitivity of at least 1% across all centres). In the validation phase, we observed excellent concordance between the laboratories for detecting mutations in the patient samples. Concordant results were obtained in 26 of 30 samples (approximately 87%). In general, the samples for which results were discordant were also less optimal, containing small amounts of tumour. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that currently available methods are capable of reliably detecting exon 19 and exon 21 mutations of EFGR in tumour samples (provided that sufficient tumour material is available) and that routine screening for those mutations is feasible in clinical practice.

[1]  A. Marchetti,et al.  Assessing EGFR mutations. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  A. Gazdar,et al.  Somatic mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway in lung cancers , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[3]  References , 1971 .

[4]  Alona Muzikansky,et al.  First-line gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring somatic EGFR mutations. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  M. Meyerson,et al.  Epidermal growth factor-independent transformation of Ba/F3 cells with cancer-derived epidermal growth factor receptor mutants induces gefitinib-sensitive cell cycle progression. , 2005, Cancer research.

[6]  Douglas B. Evans,et al.  Enrichment Methods for Mutation Detection , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[7]  A. Joe,et al.  Oncogene addiction. , 2008, Cancer research.

[8]  S. Gabriel,et al.  EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy , 2004, Science.

[9]  David Harrington,et al.  Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Y. Wu,et al.  Updated efficacy and quality-of-life (QoL) analyses in OPTIMAL, a phase III, randomized, open-label study of first-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/carboplatin in patients with EGFR-activating mutation-positive (EGFR Act Mut+) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  M. Ladanyi,et al.  Rapid polymerase chain reaction-based detection of epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung adenocarcinomas. , 2005, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[12]  Brian H. Dunford-Shore,et al.  Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma , 2008, Nature.

[13]  L. Tanoue,et al.  Gefitinib or Carboplatin–Paclitaxel in Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma , 2010 .

[14]  Young Tae Kim,et al.  Predictive and prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  C. Wagener,et al.  Methods for detection of point mutations: performance and quality assessment. IFCC Scientific Division, Committee on Molecular Biology Techniques. , 1997, Clinical chemistry.

[16]  J. Crowley,et al.  Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non--small-cell lung cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group trial. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  N. Saijo,et al.  Randomized phase III study of cisplatin plus irinotecan versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel, cisplatin plus gemcitabine, and cisplatin plus vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Four-Arm Cooperative Study in Japan. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  Daniel A. Haber,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[19]  Michael Peyton,et al.  Alterations in Genes of the EGFR Signaling Pathway and Their Relationship to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Sensitivity in Lung Cancer Cell Lines , 2009, PloS one.

[20]  T. Mok,et al.  Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations: pooled analysis , 2009, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[21]  G. Makrigiorgos,et al.  PCR-based methods for the enrichment of minority alleles and mutations. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.

[22]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2008 , 2008, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[23]  William C Hahn,et al.  Oncogenic Transformation by Inhibitor-Sensitive and -Resistant EGFR Mutants , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[24]  Balazs Halmos,et al.  Structure and clinical relevance of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  R. Ramlau,et al.  Randomized, multinational, phase III study of docetaxel plus platinum combinations versus vinorelbine plus cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the TAX 326 study group. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  Daniel A. Haber,et al.  Gefitinib-Sensitizing EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer Activate Anti-Apoptotic Pathways , 2004, Science.

[27]  Johan Vansteenkiste,et al.  Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  I. Frayling,et al.  Methods of molecular analysis: mutation detection in solid tumours , 2002, Molecular pathology : MP.

[29]  E. Felip,et al.  Erlotinib versus chemotherapy (CT) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations: Interim results of the European Erlotinib Versus Chemotherapy (EURTAC) phase III randomized trial. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  A. Gemma,et al.  First-line gefitinib versus first-line chemotherapy by carboplatin (CBDCA) plus paclitaxel (TXL) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) with EGFR mutations: A phase III study (002) by North East Japan Gefitinib Study Group. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  B. Parsons,et al.  Genotypic selection methods for the direct analysis of point mutations. , 1997, Mutation research.

[32]  N. Hanna,et al.  EGF Receptor Gene Mutations Are Common in Lung Cancers From “Never Smokers” and Are Associated With Sensitivity of Tumors to Gefitinib and Erlotinib , 2006 .

[33]  Patricia L. Harris,et al.  Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.