Computational design of an integrin I domain stabilized in the open high affinity conformation

We have taken a computational approach to design mutations that stabilize a large protein domain of ∼200 residues in two alternative conformations. Mutations in the hydrophobic core of the αMβ2 integrin I domain were designed to stabilize the crystallographically defined open or closed conformers. When expressed on the cell surface as part of the intact heterodimeric receptor, binding of the designed open and closed I domains to the ligand iC3b, a form of the complement component C3, was either increased or decreased, respectively, compared to wild type. Moreover, when expressed in isolation from other integrin domains using an artificial transmembrane domain, designed open I domains were active in ligand binding, whereas designed closed and wild type I domains were inactive. Comparison to a human expert designed open mutant showed that the computationally designed mutants are far more active. Thus, computational design can be used to stabilize a molecule in a desired conformation, and conformational change in the I domain is physiologically relevant to regulation of ligand binding.

[1]  D. L. Griffith,et al.  Two Functional States of the CD11b A-Domain: Correlations with Key Features of Two Mn2+-complexed Crystal Structures , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  T. Springer,et al.  The alpha subunit cytoplasmic domain regulates the assembly and adhesiveness of integrin lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[3]  T. Springer,et al.  Conformational changes in tertiary structure near the ligand binding site of an integrin I domain. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Stephen L. Mayo,et al.  Design, structure and stability of a hyperthermophilic protein variant , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[5]  T. Springer,et al.  Cloning of the β subunit of the leukocyte adhesion proteins: Homology to an extracellular matrix receptor defines a novel supergene family , 1987, Cell.

[6]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Protein design automation , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[7]  R. Liddington,et al.  Cell adhesion in vascular biology. New insights into integrin-ligand interaction. , 1997, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[8]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Automated design of the surface positions of protein helices , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. , 1997, Science.

[10]  I Lasters,et al.  Enhanced dead-end elimination in the search for the global minimum energy conformation of a collection of protein side chains. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[11]  T. Springer,et al.  Experimental support for a beta-propeller domain in integrin alpha-subunits and a calcium binding site on its lower surface. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  B. Finzel,et al.  Cation binding to the integrin CD11b I domain and activation model assessment. , 1998, Structure.

[13]  P. S. Kim,et al.  High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. , 1998, Science.

[14]  Richard W. Farndale,et al.  Structural Basis of Collagen Recognition by Integrin α2β1 , 2000, Cell.

[15]  M. Carson,et al.  Trench-shaped Binding Sites Promote Multiple Classes of Interactions between Collagen and the Adherence Receptors, α1β1 Integrin and Staphylococcus aureus Cna MSCRAMM* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  T. Springer,et al.  The Structure of the β-Propeller Domain and C-terminal Region of the Integrin αM Subunit , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  D. Leahy,et al.  The role of the divalent cation in the structure of the I domain from the CD11a/CD18 integrin. , 1996, Structure.

[18]  S. Venyaminov,et al.  Crystal structure of the α1β1 integrin I‐domain: insights into integrin I‐domain function , 1999 .

[19]  Timothy A. Springer,et al.  Adhesion receptors of the immune system , 1990, Nature.

[20]  E. Plow,et al.  Amino Acid Sequences within the α Subunit of Integrin αMβ2(Mac-1) Critical for Specific Recognition of C3bi† , 1999 .

[21]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Probing the role of packing specificity in protein design. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  M. Diamond,et al.  A subpopulation of Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) molecules mediates neutrophil adhesion to ICAM-1 and fibrinogen , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Computational protein design. , 1999, Structure.

[24]  D. Leahy,et al.  Crystal structure of the I-domain from the CD11a/CD18 (LFA-1, alpha L beta 2) integrin. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  R. Liddington,et al.  Crystal Structure of the I Domain from Integrin α2β1* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  L. Pearl,et al.  Recursive PCR: a novel technique for total gene synthesis. , 1992, Protein engineering.

[27]  Michael Loran Dustin,et al.  The Lymphocyte Function–associated Antigen 1 I Domain Is a Transient Binding Module for Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (ICAM)-1 and ICAM-3 in Hydrodynamic Flow , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[28]  M. Arnaout,et al.  A novel divalent cation-binding site in the a domain of the β 2 integrin CR3 (CD11b/CD18) is essential for ligand binding , 1993, Cell.

[29]  T. Springer,et al.  Activation of lymphocyte function-associated molecule-1 (CD11a/CD18) and Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) mimicked by an antibody directed against CD18. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[30]  K. Dill Dominant forces in protein folding. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[31]  H. Dyson,et al.  Gene synthesis, high-level expression, and mutagenesis of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans rusticyanin: His 85 is a ligand to the blue copper center. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[32]  Timothy A. Springer,et al.  Folding of the N-terminal, ligand-binding region of integrin α-subunits into a β-propeller domain , 1997 .

[33]  M. Diamond,et al.  The I domain is a major recognition site on the leukocyte integrin Mac- 1 (CD11b/CD18) for four distinct adhesion ligands , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  R. Liddington,et al.  Two conformations of the integrin A-domain (I-domain): a pathway for activation? , 1995, Structure.

[35]  S. A. Marshall,et al.  Energy functions for protein design. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[36]  R. Liddington,et al.  Crystal structure of the A domain from the a subunit of integrin CR3 (CD11 b/CD18) , 1995, Cell.

[37]  T. Springer,et al.  A Binding Interface on the I Domain of Lymphocyte Function-associated Antigen-1 (LFA-1) Required for Specific Interaction with Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1 (ICAM-1) (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  G J Kleywegt,et al.  Detection, delineation, measurement and display of cavities in macromolecular structures. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[39]  S L Mayo,et al.  Pairwise calculation of protein solvent-accessible surface areas. , 1998, Folding & design.