Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique

AbstractObjectivesTo prospectively evaluate dose reduction and image quality characteristics of chest CT reconstructed with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).MethodsOne hundred patients underwent reference-dose and low-dose unenhanced chest CT with 64-row multidetector CT. Images were reconstructed with 50 % ASIR-filtered back projection blending (ASIR50) for reference-dose CT, and with ASIR50 and MBIR for low-dose CT. Two radiologists assessed the images in a blinded manner for subjective image noise, artefacts and diagnostic acceptability. Objective image noise was measured in the lung parenchyma. Data were analysed using the sign test and pair-wise Student’s t-test.ResultsCompared with reference-dose CT, there was a 79.0 % decrease in dose–length product with low-dose CT. Low-dose MBIR images had significantly lower objective image noise (16.93 ± 3.00) than low-dose ASIR (49.24 ± 9.11, P < 0.01) and reference-dose ASIR images (24.93 ± 4.65, P < 0.01). Low-dose MBIR images were all diagnostically acceptable. Unique features of low-dose MBIR images included motion artefacts and pixellated blotchy appearances, which did not adversely affect diagnostic acceptability.ConclusionDiagnostically acceptable chest CT images acquired with nearly 80 % less radiation can be obtained using MBIR. MBIR shows greater potential than ASIR for providing diagnostically acceptable low-dose CT images without severely compromising image quality.Key Points• Model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) creates high-quality low-dose CT images. • MBIR significantly improves image noise and artefacts over adaptive statistical iterative techniques. • MBIR shows greater potential than ASIR for diagnostically acceptable low-dose CT. • The prolonged processing time of MBIR may currently limit its routine use in clinical practice.

[1]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at Ct: Feasibility Study Hara Et Al. Ct Iterative Reconstruction Technique Gastrointestinal Imaging Original Research , 2022 .

[2]  P C Shrimpton,et al.  National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: A pilot study. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Michael J Pentecost,et al.  American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[5]  M. L. R. D. Christenson,et al.  Image Quality and Radiation Exposure at Pulmonary CT Angiography with 100- or 120-kVp Protocol: Prospective Randomized Study , 2008 .

[6]  T. Yoshizumi,et al.  Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources--1950-2007. , 2009, Radiology.

[7]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. , 2010, Radiology.

[8]  Dongmei Sun,et al.  Hybrid convolution kernel: optimized CT of the head, neck, and spine. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  M. Kalra,et al.  Radiation Dose Reduction With Chest Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique: Initial Experience , 2010, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  D. Katz,et al.  Unenhanced Helical CT Using Increased Pitch for Suspected Renal Colic: An Effective Technique for Radiation Dose Reduction? , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  Jean-Baptiste Thibault,et al.  A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. , 2007, Medical physics.

[13]  O. Linton,et al.  NCRP REPORT NO. 160, IONIZING RADIATION EXPOSURE OF THE POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES, MEDICAL EXPOSURE—ARE WE DOING LESS WITH MORE, AND IS THERE A ROLE FOR HEALTH PHYSICISTS? , 2009, Health physics.

[14]  L. Tanoue.  Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure , 2009 .

[15]  G. Israel,et al.  Impact of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR) on radiation dose and image quality in aortic dissection studies: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[17]  Giang Nguyen,et al.  A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  M. L. Rosado de Christenson,et al.  Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Radiation Dose Reduction in Chest CT: A Pilot Study , 2012 .

[19]  Thomas L Toth,et al.  Low-dose CT of the abdomen: evaluation of image improvement with use of noise reduction filters pilot study. , 2003, Radiology.

[20]  William Pavlicek,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  D. Sahani,et al.  Reducing Abdominal CT Radiation Dose With Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[22]  Zhou Yu,et al.  Fast Model-Based X-Ray CT Reconstruction Using Spatially Nonhomogeneous ICD Optimization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  Dongmei Sun,et al.  Hybrid reconstruction kernel: optimized chest CT. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. , 2010, Radiology.

[25]  D. Lynch,et al.  The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. , 2011, Radiology.