The “Social Side” of Public Policy: Monitoring Online Public Opinion and Its Mobilization During the Policy Cycle

This article addresses the potential role played by social media analysis in promoting interaction between politicians, bureaucrats, and citizens. We show that in a “Big Data” world, the comments posted online by social media users can profitably be used to extract meaningful information, which can support the action of policymakers along the policy cycle. We analyze Twitter data through the technique of Supervised Aggregated Sentiment Analysis. We develop two case studies related to the “jobs act” labor market reform and the “#labuonascuola” school reform, both formulated and implemented by the Italian Renzi cabinet in 2014–15. Our results demonstrate that social media data can help policymakers to rate the available policy alternatives according to citizens' preferences during the formulation phase of a public policy; can help them to monitor citizens' opinions during the implementation phase; and capture stakeholders' mobilization and de-mobilization processes. We argue that, although social media analysis cannot replace other research methods, it provides a fast and cheap stream of information that can supplement traditional analyses, enhancing responsiveness and institutional learning.

[1]  G. Brewer The policy sciences emerge: To nurture and structure a discipline , 1974 .

[2]  Giuseppe Porro,et al.  Every tweet counts? How sentiment analysis of social media can improve our knowledge of citizens’ political preferences with an application to Italy and France , 2013, New Media Soc..

[3]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Stefano Maria Iacus,et al.  iSA: A fast, scalable and accurate algorithm for sentiment analysis of social media content , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[5]  Alberto Maria Segre,et al.  The Use of Twitter to Track Levels of Disease Activity and Public Concern in the U.S. during the Influenza A H1N1 Pandemic , 2011, PloS one.

[6]  Stefano M. Iacus,et al.  Measuring Idiosyncratic Happiness Through the Analysis of Twitter: An Application to the Italian Case , 2015 .

[7]  W. Bennett,et al.  DIGITAL MEDIA AND THE PERSONALIZATION OF COLLECTIVE ACTION , 2011 .

[8]  J. V. Laer,et al.  INTERNET AND SOCIAL MOVEMENT ACTION REPERTOIRES: Opportunities and limitations , 2010 .

[9]  Simo Hosio,et al.  Increasing the reach of government social media: A case study in modeling government-citizen interaction on Facebook , 2015 .

[10]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Nowcasting Events from the Social Web with Statistical Learning , 2012, TIST.

[11]  Vili Lehdonvirta Past and Emerging Themes in Policy and Internet Studies , 2014 .

[12]  Andrea Ceron,et al.  Internet, News, and Political Trust: The Difference Between Social Media and Online Media Outlets , 2015, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government , 2004 .

[14]  Fabio Franch (Wisdom of the Crowds)2: 2010 UK Election Prediction with Social Media , 2013 .

[15]  Daniel W. Drezner,et al.  The power and politics of blogs , 2007 .

[16]  Luis F. Luna-Reyes,et al.  Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[17]  Michael J. Jensen,et al.  Psephological investigations: Tweets, votes, and unknown unknowns in the republican nomination process , 2013 .

[18]  Gary King,et al.  A Method of Automated Nonparametric Content Analysis for Social Science , 2010 .

[19]  Gregory A. Porumbescu,et al.  Assessing the Link Between Online Mass Media and Trust in Government: Evidence From Seoul, South Korea: Online Mass Media and Trust in Government , 2013 .

[20]  S. Iacus,et al.  Using Sentiment Analysis to Monitor Electoral Campaigns , 2015 .

[21]  Ines Mergel,et al.  Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Helen Margetts,et al.  The Internet and Public Policy , 2009 .

[23]  T. Moe The New Economics of Organization , 1984 .

[24]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  Matthew Leighton Williams,et al.  Cyber Hate Speech on Twitter: An Application of Machine Classification and Statistical Modeling for Policy and Decision Making , 2015 .

[26]  Henrik Serup Christensen,et al.  Does Crowdsourcing Legislation Increase Political Legitimacy? The Case of Avoin Ministeriö in Finland , 2015 .

[27]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  James A. Stimson,et al.  The Moving Centre: Preferences for Government Activity in Britain, 1950–2005 , 2010, British Journal of Political Science.

[29]  A. Clarke,et al.  Governments and Citizens Getting to Know Each Other? Open, Closed, and Big Data in Public Management Reform , 2014 .

[30]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[31]  Andrea Calderaro,et al.  Special Issue on “Online Collective Action and Policy Change” , 2013 .