How visual information influences coordination dynamics when following the leader

Coordinating one's movements with others is an important aspect of human interactions. Regulating the distance to other moving agents is often necessary to achieve specific task goals such as in invasion sports. This study aimed to examine how distance regulation is mediated by different sources of information that are typically available when humans coordinate their actions to others. Participants followed a virtual leader that moved backwards and forwards, and were instructed to maintain the initial distance. In one condition, participants were presented with a life-size fully animated human avatar as the leader, displaying both segmental (limb motion) and global (optical expansion) motion information. In the other condition, participants had to follow an expanding and receding sphere in which segmental motion information was absent. Optical expansion rates revealed that participants regulated distance equally effective in both conditions. Given the phase relation and response times to direction changes however, the timing to the leader appeared to be more accurate in the avatar condition. These results provide support that forward-backward following can indeed be successfully mediated through global information, but that detection of segmental information allows for earlier tuning to another person's movement intentions.

[1]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. , 1990 .

[2]  Simone G. Shamay-Tsoory,et al.  Don't stand so close to me: A behavioral and ERP study of preferred interpersonal distance , 2013, NeuroImage.

[3]  L. Gobbi,et al.  Optic Flow Contribution to Locomotion Adjustments in Obstacle Avoidance , 2012 .

[4]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  A. Daffertshofer,et al.  Characteristics of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Timing and distance characteristics of interpersonal coordination during locomotion , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  Keith Davids,et al.  How boxers decide to punch a target: emergent behaviour in nonlinear dynamical movement systems. , 2006, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[8]  Julien Pettré,et al.  Collision avoidance between two walkers: role-dependent strategies. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[9]  Keith Davids,et al.  Information-governing dynamics of attacker–defender interactions in youth rugby union , 2008, Journal of sports sciences.

[10]  T. Vicsek,et al.  Self-organizing processes: The sound of many hands clapping , 2000, Nature.

[11]  André Roca,et al.  Identifying the processes underpinning anticipation and decision-making in a dynamic time-constrained task , 2011, Cognitive Processing.

[12]  D. Regan,et al.  Visually guided collision avoidance and collision achievement , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. , 2007, Human movement science.

[14]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Phase-entrainment dynamics of visually coupled rhythmic movements , 1994, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  Mathijs J. Hofmijster,et al.  Don’t Rock the Boat: How Antiphase Crew Coordination Affects Rowing , 2013, PloS one.

[16]  W. H. Warren,et al.  Behavioral dynamics of intercepting a moving target , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Tim McGarry,et al.  Space–time coordination dynamics in basketball: Part 2. The interaction between the two teams , 2010, Journal of sports sciences.

[18]  William H. Warren,et al.  Optic flow is used to control human walking , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  I. Couzin,et al.  Self-Organization and Collective Behavior in Vertebrates , 2003 .

[20]  Philipp Berens,et al.  CircStat: AMATLABToolbox for Circular Statistics , 2009, Journal of Statistical Software.

[21]  K. Davids,et al.  Representative task designs for the study of perception and action in sport. , 2009 .

[22]  Rouwen Cañal-Bruland,et al.  The effect of local kinematic changes on anticipation judgments. , 2011, Human movement science.

[23]  William H Warren,et al.  Follow the leader: visual control of speed in pedestrian following. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[24]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[25]  J. Issartel,et al.  Unintended interpersonal co-ordination: “can we march to the beat of our own drum?” , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  ‘Human paced’ walking: Followers adopt stride time dynamics of leaders , 2014, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  H. D. de Poel,et al.  Asymmetric interpersonal coupling in a cyclic sports-related movement task. , 2014, Human movement science.

[28]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Dynamics of Interpersonal Coordination , 2008 .

[29]  C. Sève,et al.  Space–time coordination dynamics in basketball: Part 1. Intra- and inter-couplings among player dyads , 2010, Journal of sports sciences.

[30]  Wendy D. Zosh,et al.  Optic Flow Drives Human Visuo-Locomotor Adaptation , 2007, Current Biology.

[31]  R. Kulpa,et al.  Detecting Deception in Movement: The Case of the Side-Step in Rugby , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  Michael J Richardson,et al.  Horsing Around: Spontaneous Four-Legged Coordination , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.