Exploring a geophysical process‐based attribution technique for the determination of the atmospheric boundary layer depth using aerosol lidar and near‐surface meteorological measurements

[1] A new objective method for the determination of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) depth using routine vertically pointing aerosol lidar measurements is presented. A geophysical process-based analysis is introduced to improve the attribution of the lidar-derived aerosol gradients, which is so far the most challenging part in any gradient-based technique. Using micrometeorological measurements of Obukhov length scale, both early morning and evening transition periods are determined which help separate the turbulence regimes during well-mixed convective ABL and nocturnal/stable ABL. The lidar-derived aerosol backscatter signal intensity is used to determine the hourly-averaged vertical profiles of variance of the fluctuations of particle backscatter signal providing the location of maximum turbulent mixing within the ABL; thus, obtained mean ABL depth guides the attribution by searching for the appropriate minimum of the gradients. An empirical classification of the ABL stratification patterns into three different types is proposed by determining the changes in the near-surface stability scenarios. First results using the lidar observations obtained between March and July in 2011 at SIRTA atmospheric observatory near Palaiseau (Paris suburb) in France demonstrate that the new attribution technique makes the lidar estimations of ABL depth more physically reliable under a wide spectrum of meteorological conditions. While comparing lidar and nearby radiosonde measurements of ABL depths, an excellent concordance was found with a correlation coefficient of 0.968 and 0.927 for daytime and nighttime measurements, respectively. A brief climatology of the characteristics of the ABL depth, its diurnal cycle, a detailed discussion of the morning and evening transitions are presented.

[1]  Christoph Münkel Mixing height determination with lidar ceilometers results from Helsinki Testbed , 2007 .

[2]  P. Di Girolamo,et al.  Observation of convection initiation processes with a suite of state‐of‐the‐art research instruments during COPS IOP 8b , 2010 .

[3]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  3-dimensional observations of atmospheric variables during the field campaign COPS , 2008 .

[4]  Sven-Erik Gryning,et al.  Applied model for the growth of the daytime mixed layer , 1991 .

[5]  J. Kaimal,et al.  Turbulence Structure in the Convective Boundary Layer , 1976 .

[6]  Laura Bianco,et al.  Diurnal Evolution and Annual Variability of Boundary-Layer Height and Its Correlation to Other Meteorological Variables in California’s Central Valley , 2011 .

[7]  L. Sauvage,et al.  Evaluation of Mixing-Height Retrievals from Automatic Profiling Lidars and Ceilometers in View of Future Integrated Networks in Europe , 2012, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[8]  S. Larsen,et al.  On the extension of the wind profile over homogeneous terrain beyond the surface boundary layer , 2007 .

[9]  Siegfried Raasch,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulations of Surface Heterogeneity Effects on the Convective Boundary Layer During the LITFASS-2003 Experiment , 2012, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[10]  Lucas Alados-Arboledas,et al.  Automatic determination of the planetary boundary layer height using lidar: One‐year analysis over southeastern Spain , 2012 .

[11]  A. Obukhov,et al.  Turbulence in an atmosphere with a non-uniform temperature , 1971 .

[12]  Stefan Emeis,et al.  Multiple atmospheric layering and mixing-layer height in the Inn valley observed by remote sensing , 2007 .

[13]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Effects of continental boundary layer evolution, convection, turbulence and entrainment, on aerosol formation , 2001 .

[14]  V. Masson,et al.  Negative water vapour skewness and dry tongues in the convective boundary layer: observations and large-eddy simulation budget analysis , 2007 .

[15]  C. Flamant,et al.  Urban boundary-layer height determination from lidar measurements over the paris area. , 1999, Applied optics.

[16]  Guy N. Pearson,et al.  Vertical velocity variance and skewness in clear and cloud‐topped boundary layers as revealed by Doppler lidar , 2009 .

[17]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Can Water Vapour Raman Lidar Resolve Profiles of Turbulent Variables in the Convective Boundary Layer? , 2010 .

[18]  J. Kukkonen,et al.  A Three-Step Method for Estimating the Mixing Height Using Ceilometer Data from the Helsinki Testbed , 2012 .

[19]  Ari Karppinen,et al.  Mixing height determination by ceilometer , 2005 .

[20]  D. Fitzjarrald,et al.  The Early Evening Surface-Layer Transition: Temporal and Spatial Variability , 2001 .

[21]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Elastic-backscatter-lidar-based characterization of the convective boundary layer and investigation of related statistics , 2010 .

[22]  M. Heikinheimo,et al.  Variability Of The Stable And Unstable Atmospheric Boundary-Layer Height And Its Scales Over A Boreal Forest , 2001 .

[23]  M. Haeffelin,et al.  Spatio-temporal variability of the atmospheric boundary layer depth over the Paris agglomeration: An assessment of the impact of the urban heat island intensity , 2012 .

[24]  Jens Bösenberg,et al.  Determination of the convective boundary-layer height with laser remote sensing , 2006 .

[25]  John C. Wyngaard,et al.  Turbulence in the Evolving Stable Boundary Layer , 1979 .

[26]  Angelo Riccio,et al.  Automatic detection of atmospheric boundary layer height using ceilometer backscatter data assisted by a boundary layer model , 2012 .

[27]  J. Finnigan,et al.  Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows: Their Structure and Measurement , 1994 .

[28]  G. Morris,et al.  Seasonal Variability in the Diurnal Evolution of the Boundary Layer in a Near-Coastal Urban Environment , 2012 .

[29]  H. Tennekes,et al.  A Model for the Dynamics of the Inversion Above a Convective Boundary Layer , 1973 .

[30]  Jacques Pelon,et al.  STRAT: An Automated Algorithm to Retrieve the Vertical Structure of the Atmosphere from Single-Channel Lidar Data , 2007 .

[31]  G. Pigeon,et al.  Scavenging of aerosol particles by rain in a cloud resolving model , 2010 .

[32]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Multiyear aerosol observations with dual‐wavelength Raman lidar in the framework of EARLINET , 2004 .

[33]  Henk Klein Baltink,et al.  Observations Of The Morning Transition Of The Convective Boundary Layer , 2001 .

[34]  S. Bony,et al.  SIRTA, a ground-based atmospheric observatory for cloud and aerosol research , 2005 .

[35]  R. Stull An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology , 1988 .

[36]  B. Gross,et al.  Application of active optical sensors to probe the vertical structure of the urban boundary layer and assess anomalies in air quality model PM2.5 forecasts , 2011 .

[37]  Pcs Devara,et al.  A wavelet-based spectral analysis of long-term time series of optical properties of aerosols obtained by lidar and radiometer measurements over an urban station in Western India , 2012 .

[38]  Ivan Mammarella,et al.  Characterization of a boreal convective boundary layer and its impact on atmospheric chemistry during HUMPPA-COPEC-2010 , 2012 .

[39]  A. J. van den Kroonenberg,et al.  Characteristics of the early-morning shallow convective boundary layer from Helipod Flights during STINHO-2 , 2007 .

[40]  D. Seidel,et al.  Estimating climatological planetary boundary layer heights from radiosonde observations: Comparison of methods and uncertainty analysis , 2010 .

[41]  Kevin R. Knupp,et al.  Observed Characteristics of the Afternoon–Evening Boundary Layer Transition Based on Sodar and Surface Data , 2010 .

[42]  D. Lenschow,et al.  A Comparison of Higher-Order Vertical Velocity Moments in the Convective Boundary Layer from Lidar with In Situ Measurements and Large-Eddy Simulation , 2012, Boundary-Layer Meteorology.

[43]  Xin‐Zhong Liang,et al.  Observed Diurnal Cycle Climatology of Planetary Boundary Layer Height , 2010 .

[44]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Measuring Second- through Fourth-Order Moments in Noisy Data , 2000 .

[45]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  A novel approach for the characterization of transport and optical properties of aerosol particles near sources – Part I: Measurement of particle backscatter coefficient maps with a scanning UV lidar , 2011 .

[46]  C. Moeng A Large-Eddy-Simulation Model for the Study of Planetary Boundary-Layer Turbulence , 1984 .

[47]  Petra Seibert,et al.  Review and intercomparison of operational methods for the determination of the mixing height , 2000 .

[48]  Sven-Erik Gryning,et al.  An applied model for the height of the daytime mixed layer and the entrainment zone , 1994 .