Conceptualizing Media Stimuli in Experimental Research: Psychological Versus Attribute‐Based Definitions

This paper argues for a clearer conceptualization of media stimuli in experimental research and identifies 3 issues impeding our understanding of message processing: (a) assumptions bolstered by manipulation checks about homogeneity of response to media stimuli, (b) conflation of 2 different classes of variables—media attributes and psychological states, and (c) discrepancies between the conceptual model and operational-level hypotheses used to test research questions. To provide a more comprehensive framework for investigating media effects in experimental research, we argue for a clearer conceptual separation between message attributes and user perceptions and apply a mediation model of information processing to overcome the limitations of conventional approaches. Subjected to 2 empirical tests involving the assessment of Web-based media, the model finds an increase in explained variance in each instance.

[1]  K. Clark.  Looking at Pictures , 1960 .

[2]  Brian P. Flaherty,et al.  An Alternative Framework for Defining Mediation. , 1998, Multivariate behavioral research.

[3]  A. Rubin.  Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective. , 1994 .

[4]  Erik P. Bucy,et al.  Second Generation Net News: Interactivity and Information Accessibility in the Online Environment , 2004 .

[5]  Peiling Wang,et al.  Mining longitudinal web queries: Trends and patterns , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Michael D. Slater,et al.  Media exposure and attention as mediating variables influencing social risk judgments , 2005 .

[7]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[8]  W. James Potter,et al.  Building upon the experimental design in media violence research: The importance of including receiver interpretations , 2003 .

[9]  Mike W.-L. Cheung,et al.  Comparison of Approaches to Constructing Confidence Intervals for Mediating Effects Using Structural Equation Models , 2007 .

[10]  Daniel J. O'Keefe,et al.  Message Properties, Mediating States, and Manipulation Checks: Claims, Evidence, and Data Analysis in Experimental Persuasive Message Effects Research , 2003 .

[11]  C. Nass,et al.  Differential Criteria for Evaluating Credibility of Newspapers and TV News , 1989 .

[12]  Erik P. Bucy,et al.  Media Credibility Reconsidered: Synergy Effects between On-Air and Online News , 2003 .

[13]  K. Bollen,et al.  DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS: CLASSICAL AND BOOTSTRAP ESTIMATES OF VARIABILITY , 1990 .

[14]  Erik P. Bucy.  The Interactivity Paradox: Closer to the News but Confused , 2003 .

[15]  SHYAM SUNDAR,et al.  Explicating Web Site Interactivity , 2003, Commun. Res..

[16]  Alison A. Plessinger,et al.  Exploring Receivers' Criteria for Perception of Print and Online News , 1999 .

[17]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. , 2008 .

[18]  John E. Newhagen,et al.  TV news images that induce anger, fear, and disgust: Effects on approach‐avoidance and memory , 1998 .

[19]  J. M. Kayany,et al.  Relational Control and Interactive Media Choice in Technology-Mediated Communication Situations. , 1996 .

[20]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[21]  Sally J. McMillan.  A four-part model of cyber-interactivity , 2002, New Media Soc..

[22]  Paul A. Mongeau,et al.  Specifying Causal Relationships in the Elaboration Likelihood Model , 1993 .

[23]  Jang-Sun Hwang,et al.  Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity , 2002 .

[24]  J. Newhagen.  The Role of Meaning Construction in the Process of Persuasion for Viewers of Television Images , 2002 .

[25]  Erik P. Bucy,et al.  Interactivity in Society: Locating an Elusive Concept , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[26]  M. Bradley,et al.  Looking at pictures: affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[27]  Guohua Wu,et al.  The Mediating Role of Perceived Interactivity in the Effect of Actual Interactivity on Attitude Toward the Website , 2005 .

[28]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Multitasking during Web search sessions , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[29]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[30]  Christopher E. Beaudoin,et al.  Testing the Cognitive Mediation Model , 2004, Commun. Res..

[31]  William P. Eveland.  News Information Processing as Mediator of the Relationship between Motivations and Political Knowledge , 2002 .

[32]  Thinking about theory , 1983 .

[33]  James E. Pitkow,et al.  Characterizing Browsing Strategies in the World-Wide Web , 1995, Comput. Networks ISDN Syst..

[34]  C. Judd,et al.  When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Erica Scharrer,et al.  Hypermasculinity, Aggression, and Television Violence: An Experiment , 2005 .

[36]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Analysis of the query logs of a Web site search engine , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[37]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[38]  R. L. Holbert,et al.  The Importance of Indirect Effects in Media Effects Research: Testing for Mediation in Structural Equation Modeling , 2003 .

[39]  B. Reeves,et al.  Theories About News and Theories About Cognition , 1989 .

[40]  P. Lang.  What are the Data of Emotion , 1988 .

[41]  Amanda Spink.  Web Search: Emerging Patterns , 2003, Libr. Trends.

[42]  Ron Tamborini,et al.  Internet Search Behaviors and Mood Alterations: A Selective Exposure Approach , 2002 .

[43]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[44]  John E. Newhagen,et al.  The Evening's Bad News: Effects of Compelling Negative Television News Images on Memory , 1992 .

[45]  Susan E. Morgan,et al.  Associations Between Message Features and Subjective Evaluations of the Sensation Value of Antidrug Public Service Announcements , 2003 .

[46]  Jacquelyn A. Burkell,et al.  Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[47]  E. Bucy,et al.  The Mediated Moderation Model of Interactivity , 2007 .

[48]  Mark Tremayne,et al.  Lessons Learned from Experiments with Interactivity on the Web , 2005 .

[49]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[50]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Measures of Independent Variables and Mediators Are Useful in Social Psychology Experiments: But Are They Necessary? , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[51]  John E. Newhagen,et al.  Revealing the Black Box: Information Processing and Media Effects , 1993 .

[52]  P. Palmgreen,et al.  Sensation seeking, perceived message sensation value, personal involvement, and processing of anti-marijuana PSAs , 2001 .

[53]  Amanda Spink,et al.  How are we searching the World Wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[54]  John E. Newhagen,et al.  The emotional appropriateness heuristic: processing televised presidential reactions to the news , 1999 .

[55]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[56]  Annie Lang,et al.  I Saw It on the Radio: The Allocation of Attention to High-Imagery Radio Advertisements , 2003 .

[57]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies , 1993 .

[58]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. , 2001 .

[59]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Methodology for Analyzing Web-Based Qualitative Data , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Annie Lang,et al.  The limited capacity model of mediated message processing , 2000 .

[61]  David Miller,et al.  Web search strategies and human individual differences: Cognitive and demographic factors, Internet attitudes, and approaches , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[62]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Searching the Web: a survey of EXCITE users , 1999, Internet Res..

[63]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  William L. Hays,et al.  Statistics, 5th ed. , 1994 .

[65]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  The Social, Political, Economic, and Cultural Dimensions of Search Engines: An Introduction , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[66]  John L. Sherry.  Media Effects Theory and the Nature/Nurture Debate: A Historical Overview and Directions for Future Research , 2004 .