Credibility, Public Trust, and the Transport of Radioactive Waste Through Local Communities

The location of a national repository for the storage of nuclear waste remains elusive, which is due, in part, to widespread public opposition. Once a site has been selected, waste will be trucked from sources to the site. This study reports the results of a survey of 28 community leaders who live along a planned route in Oregon in which waste from Hanford, Washington, would be trucked to a disposal site under consideration in New Mexico. The results show that problems of credibility of the U.S. Department of Energy as a message source and public distrust of the agency's performance are embedded in the nsk communication of waste transport: A full partnership between the agency and local citizens may be a first step for restoring lost credibility and trust on transport issues.

[1]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication And Persuasion , 1953 .

[2]  C. D. Ward,et al.  Better Liked than Right , 1980 .

[3]  Bernard Barber,et al.  The Logic and Limits of Trust , 1983 .

[4]  Branden B. Johnson,et al.  Public concerns and the public role in siting nuclear and chemical waste facilities , 1987 .

[5]  G. W. Snedecor.  Statistical Methods , 1964 .

[6]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[7]  Seymour Martin Lipset,et al.  The Confidence Gap , 1983 .

[8]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[9]  David A. Bella,et al.  Establishing Trust: Nuclear Waste Disposal , 1988 .

[10]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[11]  William R. Freudenburg,et al.  Risk and Recreancy: Weber, the Division of Labor, and the Rationality of Risk Perceptions , 1993 .

[12]  W. Freudenburg.  Perceived risk, real risk: social science and the art of probabilistic risk assessment. , 1988, Science.

[13]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks , 1992 .

[14]  P Slovic,et al.  Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of Nuclear Waste , 1991, Science.

[15]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High‐Level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model , 1992 .

[16]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[17]  R. Keeney,et al.  Improving risk communication. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  A. Mushkatel,et al.  Public Opposition To The Siting Of The High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository: The Importance Of Trust , 1991 .

[19]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Public Participation in Hazard Management: The Use of Citizen Panels in the U.S. , 1991 .