Life cycle analysis of environmental impact vs. durability of stabilised rammed earth

Abstract Rammed earth (RE) has enjoyed a revival in recent decades due to the increasing awareness of environmental issues surrounding the building industry. Although RE in its traditional form is deemed a highly environmentally-friendly material, the same cannot be said for its modern stabilised counterpart. Comprehensive experimental procedures exist to estimate mechanical strength properties of stabilised RE (SRE). However, tests for material durability are far less common. Engineers and practitioners therefore assume that strength and durability are interchangeable properties, i.e. the stronger the material, the more durable. Inflated strengths are recommended to ensure adequate durability, leading to high environmental costs through excessive use of stabilisers. This paper rates the relevance of two acknowledged durability tests (accelerated erosion due to sprayed water and mass loss due to wire brushing) and relates outcomes to the strength and the environmental impact of several SRE mixes. The environmental impact of each mix was estimated using attributional and consequential life cycle assessment (LCA) approaches as well as an assessment of cumulative energy demand. Results demonstrated that it is possible to have durable SRE mixes without paying the cost of using environmentally-expensive stabilisers.

[1]  Ahmed Loukili,et al.  Durability of concrete exposed to leaching and external sulphate attacks , 2009 .

[2]  C. Beckett,et al.  Weathering’s beneficial effect on waste-stabilised rammed earth: a chemical and microstructural investigation , 2017 .

[3]  João A. Labrincha,et al.  Eco-efficient Construction and Building Materials , 2011 .

[4]  Ángel Palomo,et al.  Alkali–aggregate reaction in activated fly ash systems , 2007 .

[5]  Callie W. Babbitt,et al.  A life cycle comparison of disposal and beneficial use of coal combustion products in Florida , 2008 .

[6]  Ali Behnood,et al.  Predicting modulus elasticity of recycled aggregate concrete using M5′ model tree algorithm , 2015 .

[7]  B. V. Venkatarama Reddy,et al.  Embodied energy in cement stabilised rammed earth walls , 2010 .

[8]  Other,et al.  Global guidance principles for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) databases: a basis for greener processes and products , 2011 .

[9]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .

[10]  Luís Bragança,et al.  Comparative environmental life-cycle analysis of concretes using biomass and coal fly ashes as partial cement replacement material , 2016 .

[11]  Gernot Minke,et al.  Building with Earth , 2005 .

[12]  C. Beckett,et al.  Effect of compaction water content on the strength of cement-stabilized rammed earth materials , 2014 .

[13]  Stephan A. Durham,et al.  A cradle to gate LCA framework for emissions and energy reduction in concrete pavement mixture design , 2016 .

[14]  Daniela Ciancio,et al.  Experimental investigation on the compressive strength of cored and molded cement-stabilized rammed earth samples , 2012 .

[15]  C. Beckett,et al.  Optimum lime content identification for lime-stabilised rammed earth , 2014 .

[16]  Charles E. Augarde,et al.  Earth Building: History, Science and Conservation , 2012 .

[17]  J. Morel,et al.  Durability of rammed earth walls exposed for 20 years to natural weathering , 2009 .

[18]  Paulina Faria,et al.  Hydric Behavior of Earth Materials and the Effects of Their Stabilization with Cement or Lime: Study on Repair Mortars for Historical Rammed Earth Structures , 2016 .

[19]  J. Morel,et al.  Effect of moisture content on the mechanical characteristics of rammed earth , 2014 .

[20]  Stéphane Hans,et al.  Compression behaviour of non-industrial materials in civil engineering by three scale experiments: the case of rammed earth , 2009 .

[21]  Monika Woloszyn,et al.  Reduction of rammed earth's hygroscopic performance under stabilisation: an experimental investigation , 2017 .

[22]  Peter Walker,et al.  Structural Capacity of Rammed Earth in Compression , 2008 .

[23]  Peter Walker,et al.  Building houses with local materials: means to drastically reduce the environmental impact of construction , 2001 .

[24]  Arul Arulrajah,et al.  Calcium carbide residue: Alkaline activator for clay–fly ash geopolymer , 2014 .

[25]  Callie W. Babbitt,et al.  A life cycle comparison of disposal and beneficial use of coal combustion products in Florida , 2008 .

[26]  Aires Camões,et al.  Strategies to improve earth building durability , 2014 .

[27]  Peter Walker Rammed Earth: Design and Construction Guidelines , 2010 .

[28]  B. Weidema Market information in life cycle assessment , 2003 .

[29]  C. Beckett,et al.  Effect of microstructure on heat transfer through compacted cement-stabilised soils , 2015 .

[30]  Peter Walker,et al.  Advances on the assessment of soil suitability for rammed earth , 2013 .

[31]  English Version,et al.  Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method , 2010 .

[32]  David G. Toll,et al.  The strength of unstabilised rammed earth materials , 2009 .