Genotype by Environment Variance Heterogeneity in a Two-Stage Analysis

The analysis of a series of crop variety trials often proceeds using a mixed model in which the data are the combined means from individual trials. The residual variation for this model consists of genotype by environment (G.E) interactions and within-trial error variation. The latter is regarded as known from the analyses of individual trials, and any associated heterogeneity can be accounted for in the overall mixed model by the use of weights. The G-E interactions may also have nonconstant variance and, since the variances themselves are often of interest, we propose that heterogeneity arising from these sources be accommodated by modelling the G.E variances as a log-linear function of explanatory variables. We present a residual maximum likelihood estimation method and develop a diagnostic technique for detecting dependence. The approach is demonstrated using a large unbalanced set of crop variety testing data. The methodology is easily generalized to residual variance modelling in any mixed model application.

[1]  David W. Scott The New S Language , 1990 .

[2]  S. Weisberg,et al.  Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression , 1983 .

[3]  A. Verbyla,et al.  Modelling Variance Heterogeneity: Residual Maximum Likelihood and Diagnostics , 1993 .

[4]  Brian R. Cullis,et al.  Spatial analysis of multi-environment early generation variety trials , 1998 .

[5]  G. K. Shukla,et al.  Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability , 1972, Heredity.

[6]  P. Solomon Transformations for components of variance and covariance , 1985 .

[7]  Brian R. Cullis,et al.  Accounting for natural and extraneous variation in the analysis of field experiments , 1997 .

[8]  J. Tukey One Degree of Freedom for Non-Additivity , 1949 .

[9]  William G. Cochran,et al.  The analysis of groups of experiments , 1938, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[10]  H. D. Patterson,et al.  Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal , 1971 .

[11]  A. Rathjen,et al.  Choosing trial sites to maximize selection response for grain yield in spring wheat , 1981 .

[12]  Ronald D. Snee,et al.  Nonadditivity in a Two-Way Classification: Is it Interaction or Nonhomogeneous Variance? , 1982 .

[13]  David V. Hinkley,et al.  Transformation diagnostics for linear models , 1985 .

[14]  Brian R. Cullis,et al.  Spatial analysis of field experiments : an extension to two dimensions , 1991 .

[15]  A. Baron Experimental Designs , 1990, The Behavior analyst.

[16]  Manjit S. Kang,et al.  Incorporating Additional Information on Genotypes and Environments in Models for Two-way Genotype by Environment Tables , 1996 .

[17]  Sue J. Welham,et al.  Genstat 5 release 3 reference manual , 1994 .

[18]  H. D. Patterson,et al.  Variability of yields of cereal varieties in U. K. trials , 1977, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[19]  A. P. VERBYLAt Modelling Variance Heterogeneity: Residual Maximum Likelihood and , 1993 .

[20]  Gertrude M. Cox,et al.  Experimental Design , 2019, Simulation and Computational Red Teaming for Problem Solving.

[21]  Comparison of locations used in cotton-breeding trials , 1992 .

[22]  Robin Thompson,et al.  Average information REML: An efficient algorithm for variance parameter estimation in linear mixed models , 1995 .

[23]  M. Talbot Yield variability of crop varieties in the U.K. , 1984, The Journal of Agricultural Science.