Superiority of automatic remote monitoring compared with in-person evaluation for scheduled ICD follow-up in the TRUST trial - testing execution of the recommendations
暂无分享,去创建一个
Niraj Varma | B. Stambler | N. Varma | B. Pavri | Justin Michalski | Bruce Stambler | Behzad B. Pavri | Justin Michalski
[1] H. Krumholz,et al. Telemonitoring in patients with heart failure. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.
[2] P. Heidenreich,et al. Long-Term Outcome After ICD and CRT Implantation and Influence of Remote Device Follow-Up: The ALTITUDE Survival Study , 2010, Circulation.
[3] Silvia G Priori,et al. HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations: developed in partnership with the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[4] N. Varma,et al. Home monitored ICD patients are more loyal to follow up - the paradox of remote patient management in the Trust trial , 2013 .
[5] B. Wilkoff,et al. Follow-up of patients with new cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: is adherence to the experts' recommendations associated with improved outcomes? , 2013, Heart rhythm.
[6] M. Nieuwdorp,et al. Non-invasive assessment of microvascular dysfunction in families with premature coronary artery disease. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.
[7] S. Chun,et al. Detection of Atrial Fibrillation by Implanted Devices with Wireless Data Transmission Capability , 2005, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.
[8] Niraj Varma,et al. Rationale and design of a prospective study of the efficacy of a remote monitoring system used in implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up Study (TRUST) study. , 2007, American heart journal.
[9] Niraj Varma,et al. Remote monitoring of cardiovascular devices: a time and activity analysis. , 2012, Heart rhythm.
[10] H. Burri. Remote follow-up and continuous remote monitoring, distinguished. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[11] G. Hindricks,et al. Quarterly vs. yearly clinical follow-up of remotely monitored recipients of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of the REFORM trial , 2013, European heart journal.
[12] A. Boyle,et al. The CONNECT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[13] Renato Pietro Ricci,et al. Effectiveness of remote monitoring of CIEDs in detection and treatment of clinical and device-related cardiovascular events in daily practice: the HomeGuide Registry , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[14] Laura G. Qualls,et al. Follow-up of Patients With New Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices: Are Experts’ Recommendations Implemented in Routine Clinical Practice? , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.
[15] B. Meier,et al. Percutaneous repair of sinus venosus defect with anomalous pulmonary venous return. , 2014, European Heart Journal.
[16] Renato Pietro Ricci,et al. Long-term patient acceptance of and satisfaction with implanted device remote monitoring. , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[17] R. Schweikert,et al. Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Remote Monitoring for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Follow-Up: The Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) Trial , 2010, Circulation.
[18] Maria Grazia Bongiorni,et al. Practices of cardiac implantable electronic device follow-up: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[19] S. Priori,et al. HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations. , 2008, Heart rhythm.