Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses.

1. The effects of different forms of brain stimulation on the discharge pattern of single motor units were examined using the post‐stimulus time histogram (PSTH) technique and by recording the compound surface electromyographic (EMG) responses in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. Electrical and magnetic methods were used to stimulate the brain through the intact scalp of seven normal subjects. Electrical stimuli were applied either with the anode over the lateral central scalp and the cathode at the vertex (anodal stimulation) or with the anode at the vertex and the cathode lateral (cathodal stimulation). Magnetic stimulation used a 9 cm diameter coil centred at the vertex; current in the coil flowed either clockwise or anticlockwise when viewed from above. 2. Supramotor threshold stimuli produced one or more narrow (less than 2 ms) peaks of increased firing in the PSTH of all thirty‐two units studied. Anodal stimulation always produced an early peak. The latencies of the peaks produced by other forms of stimulation, or by high intensities of anodal stimulation, were grouped into four time bands relative to this early peak, at intervals of ‐0.5 to 0.5, 1‐2, 2.5‐3.5 and 4‐5.5 ms later. Peaks occurring within these intervals are referred to as P0 (the earliest anodal), P1, P2 and P3 respectively. 3. At threshold, anodal stimulation evoked only the P0 peak; at higher intensities, the P2 or more commonly the P3 peak also was recruited. The size of the P0 peak appeared to saturate at high intensities. 4. In five of six subjects, cathodal stimulation behaved like anodal stimulation, except that there was a lower threshold for recruitment of the P2 or P3 peak relative to that of the P0 peak. In the other subject, the P3 peak was recruited before the P0 peak. 5. Anticlockwise magnetic [corrected] stimulation, at threshold, often produced several peaks. These always included a P1 peak, and usually a P3 peak. A P0 peak in the PSTH was never produced by an anticlockwise stimulation [corrected] at intensities which we could explore with the technique. 6. Clockwise magnetic [corrected] stimulation never recruited a P1 peak; in most subjects a P3 peak was recruited first and at higher intensities was accompanied by P0 or P2 peaks. 7. On most occasions when more than one peak was observed in a PSTH, the unit fired in only one of the preferred intervals after each shock. However, double firing was seen in five units when high intensities of stimulation were used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

[1]  V. Amassian,et al.  Single and multiple-unit analysis of cortical stage of pyramidal tract activation. , 1954, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  C. G. Phillips,et al.  Minimal synaptic actions of pyrimidal impulses on some alpha motoneurones of the baboon's hand and forearm , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  C. G. Phillips,et al.  Selective excitation of corticofugal neurones by surface‐anodal stimulation of the baboon's motor cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  D. Kernell THE DELAYED DEPOLARIZATION IN CAT AND RAT MOTONEURONES. , 1964, Progress in brain research.

[5]  C. G. Phillips,et al.  THE PYRAMIDAL PROJECTION TO MOTONEURONES OF SOME MUSCLE GROUPS OF THE BABOON'S FORELIMB. , 1964, Progress in brain research.

[6]  M. Clare,et al.  Site of excitation in stimulation of the motor cortex. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  D. Kernell,et al.  Post‐synaptic effects of cortical stimulation on forelimb motoneurones in the baboon , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  D. Kernell,et al.  Responses of the pyramidal tract to stimulation of the baboon's motor cortex , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  W H Calvin,et al.  Steps in production of motoneuron spikes during rhythmic firing. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  E. Jankowska,et al.  Projections of pyramidal tract cells to alpha‐motoneurones innervating hind‐limb muscles in the monkey. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review , 1975, Brain Research.

[12]  E Jankowska,et al.  The mode of activation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical stimuli. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  C. G. Phillips,et al.  Corticospinal neurones. Their role in movement. , 1977, Monographs of the Physiological Society.

[14]  H. Morton,et al.  Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject , 1980, Nature.

[15]  E E Fetz,et al.  Relation between shapes of post‐synaptic potentials and changes in firing probability of cat motoneurones , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  C D Marsden,et al.  Direct electrical stimulation of corticospinal pathways through the intact scalp in human subjects. , 1983, Advances in neurology.

[17]  E. Fetz,et al.  Effects of single intracortical microstimuli in motor cortex on activity of identified forearm motor units in behaving monkeys. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  B. Day,et al.  DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF THE HUMAN-BRAIN , 1986 .

[19]  P. Thompson,et al.  Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 1. General characteristics of EMG responses in different muscles. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  Brian L. Day,et al.  Different sites of action of electrical and magnetic stimulation of the human brain , 1987, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Knowledge of motor commands and the recruitment of human motoneurons. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  P. Thompson,et al.  Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 2. Multiple descending volleys. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  K. Mills,et al.  Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  C. G. Phillips Epicortical electrical mapping of motor areas in primates. , 2007, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[25]  J. Zidar,et al.  Percutaneous stimulation of human corticospinal tract: a single-fibre EMG study of individual motor unit responses , 1987, Brain Research.

[26]  A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF CATHODAL, AND ANODAL STIMULATION OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX THROUGH THE INTACT SCALP , 1987 .

[27]  P. Thompson,et al.  Magnetic stimulation of the human brain can activate different neuronal elements when the magnetic field direction is reversed , 1988 .