Basal phenotype identifies a poor prognostic subgroup of breast cancer of clinical importance.

BACKGROUND Breast cancer is recognised to be a heterogeneous disease with a range of morphological appearances and behaviours. The recently recognised basal phenotype (BP) is associated with poor survival, but the clinical implications of this class of breast cancers remain to be adequately defined. METHODS We have examined a well-characterised series of 1872 invasive breast carcinomas with a long term follow-up to assess the clinical significance of BP. RESULTS A pragmatic definition of the BP as immunophenotypic evidence of basal cytokeratins CK5/6 and/or CK14 expression was used. These tumours were associated with shorter overall survival and disease-free interval in our series as a whole and in both the lymph node (LN) negative and LN positive subgroups. When stratified by histological grade, BP was of highly significant prognostic value in grade 3 but not in grades 1 or 2 tumours. Similarly, it was associated with poor survival in the moderate group of the Nottingham prognostic Index but not in the other groups. In a subgroup comprising LN negative grade 3 tumours, BP was the most powerful prognostic marker followed only by tumour size, while the other variables were non-significant. Patients with BP were more likely to respond to chemotherapy than those with non-basal tumours. CONCLUSIONS Our results provide robust evidence that BP is an important class of breast cancers with a particularly aggressive behaviour in patients with LN negative grade 3 disease. We recommend routine identification of BP in breast cancer and the development of effective adjuvant treatment strategies. These are important observations as these tumours typically lack hormone receptor and HER-2 overexpression limiting the range of relevant adjuvant therapies.

[1]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  J. Jakić-Razumović,et al.  Prognostic Value of Different Factors in Breast Carcinoma , 2004, Tumori.

[3]  A. Gown,et al.  Immunohistochemical and Clinical Characterization of the Basal-Like Subtype of Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[4]  J. Robertson,et al.  Morphological and immunophenotypic analysis of breast carcinomas with basal and myoepithelial differentiation , 2006, The Journal of pathology.

[5]  R. Moll,et al.  Biological and prognostic significance of stratified epithelial cytokeratins in infiltrating ductal breast carcinomas , 1998, Virchows Archiv.

[6]  I. Ellis,et al.  The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[7]  E. Perez,et al.  Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: recommendations for management based on consensus review and recent clinical trials. , 2002, The oncologist.

[8]  D. Birnbaum,et al.  Typical medullary breast carcinomas have a basal/myoepithelial phenotype , 2005, The Journal of pathology.

[9]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  The pathology of familial breast cancer: predictive value of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Qifeng Yang,et al.  Predictive and prognostic markers for invasive breast cancer , 2002, Pathology international.

[11]  G. Ball,et al.  High‐throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well‐characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses , 2005, International journal of cancer.

[12]  H Buerger,et al.  Different genetic pathways in the evolution of invasive breast cancer are associated with distinct morphological subtypes , 1999, The Journal of pathology.

[13]  L. Beckman,et al.  Overexpression of c-erbB-2 is related to a higher expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and constitutes an independent prognostic factor in primary node-positive breast cancer after adjuvant systemic treatment. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[14]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Jorge S. Reis-Filho,et al.  Molecular Cytogenetic Identification of Subgroups of Grade III Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinomas with Different Clinical Outcomes , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  A. Hanby,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridization of breast tumors stratified by histological grade reveals new insights into the biological progression of breast cancer. , 1999, Cancer research.

[17]  J. Rosen,et al.  Stem/Progenitor Cells in Mouse Mammary Gland Development and Breast Cancer , 2005, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[18]  S. Lakhani,et al.  Salivary gland-like tumours of the breast: surgical and molecular pathology , 2003, Journal of clinical pathology.

[19]  D. Ross,et al.  Basal cytokeratins and their relationship to the cellular origin and functional classification of breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[20]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[21]  C. Eaves,et al.  Characterization of bipotent mammary epithelial progenitor cells in normal adult human breast tissue , 2001, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[22]  I. Ellis,et al.  Expression and co-expression of the members of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family in invasive breast carcinoma , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  D. Rimm,et al.  Validation of Tissue Microarray Technology in Breast Carcinoma , 2000, Laboratory Investigation.

[24]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[25]  I. Ellis,et al.  Expression of luminal and basal cytokeratins in human breast carcinoma , 2004, The Journal of pathology.

[26]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Copyright © American Society for Investigative Pathology Short Communication Expression of Cytokeratins 17 and 5 Identifies a Group of Breast Carcinomas with Poor Clinical Outcome , 2022 .

[27]  W. Boecker,et al.  Evidence of progenitor cells of glandular and myoepithelial cell lineages in the human adult female breast epithelium: a new progenitor (adult stem) cell concept , 2003, Cell proliferation.

[28]  D. Horsfall,et al.  Cyclin DI amplification is not associated with reduced overall survival in primary breast cancer but may predict early relapse in patients with features of good prognosis. , 1996, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[29]  J. Palazzo,et al.  The prognostic significance of multiple morphologic features and biologic markers in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast , 2004, Cancer.

[30]  D. Fouskakis,et al.  Tumor histology and stage but not p53, Her2-neu or cathepsin-D expression are independent prognostic factors in breast cancer patients. , 2004, Anticancer research.

[31]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[32]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Current and New Predictors of Metastasis , 2001, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[33]  S. Pinder,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. III. Vascular invasion: relationship with recurrence and survival in a large study with long‐term follow‐up , 1994, Histopathology.

[34]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Towards a novel classification of human malignancies based on gene expression patterns , 2001, The Journal of pathology.

[35]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[36]  A. Hackett,et al.  MONOCLONAL MARKER THAT PREDICTS EARLY RECURRENCE OF BREAST CANCER , 1987, The Lancet.

[37]  R. F. Harvey,et al.  A SIMPLE INDEX OF CROHN'S-DISEASE ACTIVITY , 1980, The Lancet.

[38]  J. Kononen,et al.  Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[39]  R. Blamey,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long‐term follow‐up , 1992, Histopathology.

[40]  Julian Peto,et al.  Prediction of BRCA1 Status in Patients with Breast Cancer Using Estrogen Receptor and Basal Phenotype , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[41]  S. Pinder,et al.  The importance of the histologic grade of invasive breast carcinoma and response to chemotherapy , 1998, Cancer.

[42]  A. Bednarek,et al.  Prognostic Relevance of Basal Cytokeratin Expression in Operable Breast Cancer , 2006, Oncology.