Chaos identification of a colliding constrained body on a moving belt

In this work, the combination of the 0–1 test for chaos and approximate entropy is applied to a newly established mechanical model instead of the Lyapunov exponent exploration on huge simulations reached on the supercomputer Salomon (Czech Republic). This procedure is applied to the mechanical systems modeled by a system of non-autonomous ordinary differential equations that detects the type of trajectories generated when the system parameters are changed. This new mechanical system is formed by an impact element hanging on a flexible rope, and a moving belt, etc. This contact system with impacts and dry friction is based on numerous industrial applications such as stones falling on a moving conveyor belt. The mathematical model’s systems of equations have three degrees of freedom: two of them correspond to the position of the impact body center of gravity and the third one to the angular rotation. As the main aim, it is shown that the investigated systems exhibit a full range of trajectory types, meaning it can act in both a regular and irregular way. These results are supported by bifurcation diagrams and phase portraits for a suitable choice of drive parameters: the excitation frequency and amplitude.

[1]  S M Pincus,et al.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  T. Martinovic,et al.  Chaotic behavior of the CML model with respect to the state and coupling parameters , 2019, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry.

[3]  M. Lampart,et al.  Dynamical properties of a non‐autonomous bouncing ball model forced by non‐harmonic excitation , 2016 .

[4]  Claude-Henri Lamarque,et al.  Bifurcation and Chaos in Nonsmooth Mechanical Systems , 2003 .

[5]  Jan Awrejcewicz,et al.  Bifurcation and Chaos , 1995 .

[6]  M. Lampart,et al.  Dynamical properties of a nonautonomous double pendulum model , 2018 .

[7]  G. Benettin,et al.  Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents for smooth dynamical systems and for hamiltonian systems; a method for computing all of them. Part 1: Theory , 1980 .

[8]  Kjetil Wormnes,et al.  Application of the 0-1 Test for Chaos to Experimental Data , 2007, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[9]  Brandon C. Gegg,et al.  On the Mechanism of Stick and Nonstick, Periodic Motions in a Periodically Forced, Linear Oscillator With Dry Friction , 2006 .

[10]  Brandon C. Gegg,et al.  Grazing phenomena in a periodically forced, friction-induced, linear oscillator , 2006 .

[11]  G. Benettin,et al.  Lyapunov Characteristic Exponents for smooth dynamical systems and for hamiltonian systems; A method for computing all of them. Part 2: Numerical application , 1980 .

[12]  Marek Lampart,et al.  Dynamics of the electromechanical system with impact element , 2013 .

[13]  Reza Boostani,et al.  Entropy and complexity measures for EEG signal classification of schizophrenic and control participants , 2009, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[14]  Albert C. J. Luo,et al.  A theory for non-smooth dynamic systems on the connectable domains , 2005 .

[15]  Georg A. Gottwald,et al.  A new test for chaos in deterministic systems , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  Serge Abrate,et al.  Vibrations of belts and belt drives , 1992 .

[17]  Brandon C. Gegg,et al.  Periodic Motions in a Periodically Forced Oscillator Moving on an Oscillating Belt With Dry Friction , 2006 .

[19]  Ugo Galvanetto,et al.  Non-linear dynamics of a mechanical system with a frictional unilateral constraint , 2009 .

[20]  T. Martinovic,et al.  Chaotic behaviour of noisy traffic data , 2016 .

[21]  F. Moon,et al.  Chaos in a Forced Dry-Friction Oscillator: Experiments and Numerical Modelling , 1994 .

[22]  A. Wolf,et al.  Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series , 1985 .