Multiple acoustic source localization using ambiguous phase differences under reverberative conditions

“Phase ambiguity” leads to confusion in computational source localization where multiple source locations are introduced from a cross-spectral phase value measured by two sensors at high frequencies, where sound wavelength is shorter than sensor interval. In this paper, a frequency domain algorithm for broadband source localization by two sensors is proposed for solving “phase ambiguity” confusion under actual conditions. Using the overlapped and averaged phase differences of the cross-spectral phases measured over the audible frequency range, multiple source azimuths are identified from each phase difference as much as possible over the azimuth range of ±90°. The frequency-independent azimuths extracted from multiple azimuths by Hough transformation provide the target source azimuths. The azimuths for the two loudspeakers can be identified simultaneously in this way from the phase differences measured over the full audible frequency range within an error of approximately 6° under reverberative conditions. By removing the numerical noise during source azimuth identification, the estimated source distribution corresponds to the diameters of the loudspeakers. When it is necessary to distinguish between near or far sound sources around the microphones, the horizontal azimuths for the sources can be precisely identified from all directions except at approximately ±90° if judgment of the front or back is given.

[1]  B C Wheeler,et al.  Localization of multiple sound sources with two microphones. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  L A JEFFRESS,et al.  A place theory of sound localization. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[3]  Gerald M. Edelman,et al.  Robust localization of auditory and visual targets in a robotic barn owl , 2000, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[4]  H S Colburn,et al.  Theory of binaural interaction based in auditory-nerve data. IV. A model for subjective lateral position. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  P M Zurek,et al.  The precedence effect and its possible role in the avoidance of interaural ambiguities. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M Konishi,et al.  Study of sound localization by owls and its relevance to humans. , 2000, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[7]  W. Lindemann Extension of a binaural cross-correlation model by contralateral inhibition. I. Simulation of lateralization for stationary signals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Tsuyoshi Usagawa,et al.  Frequency domain binaural model based on interaural phase and level differences , 2003 .

[9]  Ken Yamazaki,et al.  Acoustic source localization using phase difference spectrum images , 2003 .

[10]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[11]  M. Konishi,et al.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  Michele Rucci,et al.  Theoretical study , 2022 .