Evaluation of Handgun and Broadcast Systems for Spray Deposition in Greenhouse Poinsettia Canopies

Handgun applicators are popular, general-purpose greenhouse sprayers. However, there are few recommendations on how to use them to treat plant benches. Handgun applications made from one side can result in significant differences in deposits between the side of the plant facing the spray stream and the opposite side. Broadcast spraying over the top of the canopy may improve spray distribution across the canopy. The objective of this research was to determine differences in performance between different sprayers used to treat mature poinsettias and differences in the fate of the spray within the canopy with the aim to determine which techniques produced the highest spray retention on the abaxial leaf surface. A benchtop trial was conducted using a mature poinsettia canopy in a greenhouse. Sprayer treatments were used to apply tank mixes of pesticides and fluorescent tracer. Nylon screen targets were secured to the abaxial surfaces of leaves in the upper and lower parts of the canopy. Benchtop trials revealed significant differences between the amount of spray found on the upper and lower canopy target areas. Handgun nozzle pressure was a more significant factor in depositing material on the abaxial surfaces of leaves than changing application rate. A TwinJet boom system using dual-orifice nozzles did not treat abaxial surfaces differently from the handgun applications. The air-assist treatment with flat-fan nozzles produced the highest mean deposits on abaxial surfaces in the lower canopy area, but overall there were no statistical differences in lower canopy deposits between treatments. These results demonstrate the difficulty that ornamental producers have in targeting pesticide placement on abaxial leaf surfaces deeper in the canopy. The variability in spray deposits observed on foliage demonstrates the potential for significant variability in pest management.

[1]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Spray Penetration into Peanut Canopies with Hydraulic Nozzle Tips , 2004 .

[2]  Heribert Koch,et al.  Einsatz eines Düsenverbandes und flächenbezogene Dosierung bei der Anwendung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln im Gewächshaus , 2003, Gesunde Pflanzen.

[3]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  Volume, Speed, and Distribution Technique Effects on Poinsettia Foliar Deposits , 1996 .

[4]  Alvin R. Womac,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF AIR-ASSISTED AND DROP-NOZZLE SPRAYS IN COTTON , 1992 .

[5]  Yang Yu,et al.  SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS AND DRIFT REDUCTION POTENTIAL WITH AIR INDUCTION AND CONVENTIONAL FLAT-FAN NOZZLES , 2007 .

[6]  R. Thériault,et al.  FIELD EVALUATION OF AIR-ASSISTED BOOM SPRAYING ON BROCCOLI AND POTATO , 2000 .

[7]  Charles R Krause,et al.  Comparing greenhouse sprayers: the dose-transfer process. , 2004, Pest management science.

[8]  G. Hartman,et al.  Efficacy of Fungicides on Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Their Potential for Control of Sclerotinia Stem Rot on Soybean. , 2002, Plant disease.

[9]  Heping Zhu,et al.  INFLUENCE OF PLANT STRUCTURE, ORIFICE SIZE, AND NOZZLE INCLINATION ON SPRAY PENETRATION INTO PEANUT CANOPY , 2002 .

[10]  A. Jerardo Floriculture and Nursery Crops Yearbook , 2006 .

[11]  H. Zhu,et al.  FIELD EVALUATION OF APPLICATION VARIABLES AND PLANT DENSITY FOR BELL PEPPER PEST MANAGEMENT , 2007 .

[12]  Heping Zhu,et al.  Comparing Greenhouse Handgun Delivery to Poinsettias by Spray Volume and Quality , 2008 .

[13]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  AIRBORNE SPRAY COLLECTION EFFICIENCY OF NYLON SCREEN , 2004 .

[14]  Heping Zhu,et al.  A SPECIALLY DESIGNED AIR-ASSISTED SPRAYER TO IMPROVE SPRAY PENETRATION AND AIR JET VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION INSIDE DENSE NURSERY CROPS , 2006 .

[15]  B Sonck,et al.  Optimisation of a vertical spray boom for greenhouse spraying applications. , 2003, Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences.

[16]  H. E. Ozkan,et al.  Evaluation of various spraying equipment for effective application of fungicides to control Asian soybean rust , 2006 .

[17]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  Spray deposition characteristics on tomatoes and disease management as influenced by droplet size, spray volume, and air-assistance , 2001 .