Vertical-tail-buffeting alleviation using piezoelectric actuators: some results of the actively controlled response of buffet-affected tails (ACROBAT) program

Buffet is an aeroelastic phenomenon associated with high performance aircraft especially those with twin vertical tails. In particular, for the F/A-18 aircraft at high angles of attack, vortices emanating from wing/fuselage leading edge extensions burst, immersing the vertical tails in their wake. The resulting buffet loads on the vertical tails are a concern from fatigue and inspection points of view. Recently, a 1/6-scale F-18 wind-tunnel model was tested in the Transonic Dynamics Tunnel at the NASA Langley Research Center as part of the Actively Controlled Response of Buffet Affected Tails (ACROBAT) Program to assess the use of active controls in reducing vertical tail buffeting. The starboard vertical tail was equipped with an active rudder and the port vertical tail was equiped with piezoelectric actuators. The tunnel conditions were atmospheric air at Mach 0.10. By using single-input-single-output control laws at gains well below the physical limits of the actuators, the power spectral density of the root strains at the frequency of the first bending mode of the vertical tail was reduced by as much as 60 percent up to angles of attack of 37 degrees. Root mean square (RMS) values of root strain were reduced by as much as 19 percent. The results herein illustrate that buffet alleviation of vertical tails can be accomplished using simple active control of the rudder or poezoelectric actuators. In fact, as demonstrated herein, a fixed gain single input single output control law that commands piezoelectric actuators may be active throughout the high angle-of-attack maneuver without requiring any changes during the maneuver. Future tests are mentioned for accentuating the international interest in this area of research.

[1]  Carol D. Wieseman,et al.  On-line analysis capabilities developed to support the AFW wind-tunnel tests , 1992 .

[2]  D. Brown,et al.  Wind Tunnel Investigation and Flight Tests of Tail Buffet on the CF-18 Aircraft, , 1990 .

[3]  W Moses Robert,et al.  A Comparison of Pressure Measurements Between a Full-Scale and a 1/6-Scale F/A-18 Twin Tail During Buffet , 1996 .

[4]  B. Lee,et al.  Buffet load measurements on an F/A-18 vertical fin at high-angle-of-attack , 1992 .

[5]  H. Ashley,et al.  Active Control for Fin Buffet Alleviation , 1993 .

[6]  Chris L. Pettit,et al.  Full-scale wind-tunnel pressure measurements of an F/A-18 tail during buffet , 1996 .

[7]  Gene F. Franklin,et al.  Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems , 1986 .

[8]  Carol D. Wieseman,et al.  On-line analysis capabilities developed to support the active flexible wing wind-tunnel tests , 1995 .

[9]  Sherwood T. Hoadley,et al.  Multiple-Function Digital Controller System for Active Flexible Wing Wind-Tunnel Model , 1995 .

[10]  Gregory S. Agnes,et al.  Active smart material system for buffet load alleviation , 1995, Smart Structures.

[11]  K. Ravindra,et al.  Reduction of vertical tail buffet response using active control , 1995 .

[12]  Julius S. Bendat,et al.  Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis , 1980 .

[13]  Randall Hauch,et al.  Reduction of vertical tail buffet response using active control , 1995 .

[14]  Ed Pendleton,et al.  Pressure Measurements on an F/A-18 Twin Vertical Tail in Buffeting Flow. Volume 3. Buffet Power Spectral Densities , 1994 .

[15]  Larry A. Meyn,et al.  Full-scale wind-tunnel studies of F/A-18 tail buffet , 1996 .

[16]  F. C. Tang,et al.  Unsteady pressure and load measurements on an F/A-18 vertical fin , 1993 .

[17]  M. A. Ferman,et al.  Prediction of tail buffet loads for design application , 1989 .

[18]  B. Lee,et al.  Unsteady pressure and load measurements on an F/A-18 vertical fin athigh-angle-of-attack , 1992 .

[19]  Chris L. Pettit,et al.  Wind tunnel tests of full-scale F/A-18 twin tail buffet - A summary of pressure and response measurements , 1994 .