Deontic and action logics for collective agency and roles

In this paper we address the problem of collective agency, and propose a deontic/action modal logic for that purpose. We argue that once we want to attribute obligations (permissions or other deontic notions) to a set of agents, we need to consider a new agent – an institutionalized agent, and specify how he interacts with the external world: how the obligations flow from the institutionalized agent to the real agents that support him, and how the actions of the latter count as actions of the former. But an agent may act in many qualities (roles), and it is essential to know in which quality an agent has acted, or intends to act, for three main reasons: to know the effects of the act, its deontic qualification, and authentication issues. Thus, we extend the “sees to it” action operator with an explicit index that states the quality (role) in which the agent has acted. We also show how to associate obligations to roles, and illustrate how this can be used to express the desired flow of obligations. Section

[1]  S. Kanger New Foundations for Ethical Theory , 1970 .

[2]  Mark A. Brown,et al.  Third international workshop on deontic logic in computer science , 1996, Knowl. Eng. Rev..

[3]  Fabio Massacci,et al.  Reasoning About Security: A Logic and a Decision Method for Role-Based Access Control , 1997, ECSQARU-FAPR.

[4]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Position and change : a study in law and logic , 1979 .

[5]  Filipe Santos,et al.  Indirect Action, Influence and Responsibility , 1996, DEON.

[6]  N. Belnap Backwards and Forwards in the Modal Logic of Agency , 1991 .

[7]  Brian F. Chellas Time and modality in the logic of agency , 1992, Stud Logica.

[8]  Roel Wieringa,et al.  Deontic logic: a concise overview , 1994 .

[9]  Andrew J. I. Jones,et al.  Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duties , 2002 .

[10]  Marek J. Sergot,et al.  A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power , 1996, Log. J. IGPL.

[11]  Lambèr M. M. Royakkers,et al.  Collective obligation and commitment , 1998 .

[12]  P. J. Fitzgerald,et al.  Law and Logic , 1964 .

[13]  B. Lampson,et al.  Authentication in distributed systems: theory and practice , 1991, TOCS.

[14]  Brian F. Chellas Modal Logic: Normal systems of modal logic , 1980 .

[15]  M. Georgeff,et al.  Social Plans: A Preliminary Report , 1992 .

[16]  Martín Abadi,et al.  A Calculus for Access Control in Distributed Systems , 1991, CRYPTO.

[17]  David Harel,et al.  First-Order Dynamic Logic , 1979, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[18]  Elisa Bertino,et al.  A flexible model supporting the specification and enforcement of role-based authorization in workflow management systems , 1997, RBAC '97.