Validity and reliability of the session RPE method for monitoring exercise training intensity

Objective. The Session Rating of Perceived Extertion (RPE) is a method of measuring exercise intensity that may be useful for the quantitative assessment of exercise training programmes. However, there are inadequate data regarding the validity and reliability of the Session RPE method. This study was designed to evaluate both the validity and reliability of the Session RPE method in comparison to objective measures (%HRpeak, %HRreserve and %VO2peak) of exercise intensity. Methods. Fourteen healthy volunteers (7 male, 7 female) performed 6 randomly ordered 30-minute constant-load exercise bouts at 3 different intensities, with each intensity being repeated. Oxygen consumption (VO2) and heart rate (HR) were measured throughout each exercise bout and normalised to maximal values obtained during a preliminary maximal exercise test. Thirty minutes following the conclusion of each exercise bout, the subject rated the global intensity of the bout using a modification of the Category Ratio (CR) (0 - 10) RPE scale. This rating was compared to the mean value of objectively measured exercise intensity across the duration of the bout. Results. There were significant non-linear relationships between Session RPE and %VO2peak (R2 = 0.76), %HRpeak (R2 = 0.74) and %HRreserve (R2 = 0.71). There were no significant differences between test and retest values of %VO2peak, %HRpeak, %HRreserve and Session RPE during the easy (47 v. 47%, 65 v. 66%, 47 v. 48% and 2.0 v. 1.9), moderate (69 v. 70%, 83 v. 84%, 74 v. 75%, and 4.2 v. 4.3) and hard (81 v. 81%, 94 v. 94%, 91 v. 91% and 7.3 v. 7.4) exercise bouts. Correlations between repeated bouts for %VO2peak (r = 0.98), %HRpeak (r = 0.98), %HRreserve (r = 0.98) and Session RPE (r = 0.88) were significant and strong. Conclusions. The results support the validity and reliability of the Session RPE method of monitoring exercise intensity, although as might be predicted for a subjective method the Session RPE was less precise than the objective measures of exercise training intensity. South African Journal of Sports Medicine Vol. 18 (1) 2006: pp. 14-17

[1]  A. Lucia,et al.  Heart rate response to professional road cycling: the Tour de France. , 2007, International journal of sports medicine.

[2]  K. S. Seiler,et al.  Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an “optimal” distribution? , 2006, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[3]  Alejandro Lucia,et al.  Regulation of energy expenditure during prolonged athletic competition. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  M. McGuigan,et al.  A New Approach to Monitoring Resistance Training , 2004 .

[5]  Michael R McGuigan,et al.  QUANTITATION OF RESISTANCE TRAINING USING THE SESSION RATING OF PERCEIVED EXERTION METHOD , 2004, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[6]  Franco M Impellizzeri,et al.  Use of RPE-based training load in soccer. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  Alejandro Lucia,et al.  Tour de France versus Vuelta a España: which is harder? , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  M. Day.  Monitoring work intensities during resistance training using a session RPE scale , 2003 .

[9]  Esten,et al.  Differences in perceptions of training by coaches and athletes , 2001 .

[10]  C. Foster,et al.  A New Approach to Monitoring Exercise Training , 2001, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[11]  C. Foster,et al.  Monitoring training in athletes with reference to overtraining syndrome. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  B. Chaitman,et al.  Recommendations for cardiovascular screening, staffing, and emergency policies at health/fitness facilities. , 1998, Circulation.

[13]  C Foster,et al.  Athletic performance in relation to training load. , 1996, Wisconsin medical journal.

[14]  E W Banister,et al.  Optimizing athletic performance by influence curves. , 1991, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  E W Banister,et al.  Modeling human performance in running. , 1990, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  K B Pandolf,et al.  ADVANCES IN THE STUDY AND APPLICATION OF PERCEIVED EXERTION , 1983, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[17]  Gunnar Borg,et al.  The increase of perceived exertion, aches and pain in the legs, heart rate and blood lactate during exercise on a bicycle ergometer , 2006, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[18]  C. Foster,et al.  Salivary Cortisol Responses and Perceived Exertion during High Intensity and Low Intensity Bouts of Resistance Exercise. , 2004, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[19]  Ann C. Snyder,et al.  Effects of specific versus cross-training on running performance , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[20]  Gunnar Borg,et al.  Perceived exertion related to heart rate and blood lactate during arm and leg exercise , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[21]  E. Buskirk,et al.  The validity and reliability of a rating scale of perceived exertion. , 1973, Medicine and science in sports.