Typifying cities to streamline the selection of relevant environmental sustainability indicators for urban water supply and sewage handling systems: a recommendation

Measuring performance and setting targets and benchmarks for the future entail the adoption of metrics or indicators. Sustainability is a multi-pronged objective encompassing social, economic, health, cultural, governance and environmental aspects. Indicators can be grouped under these categories. The selection of environmental sustainability indicators for a water and wastewater utility in a city needs to be based on concerns specific to the utility in question. The authors, in this paper, have recommended the classification of cities into city types based on specific attributes and identification of relevant environmental sustainability indicators, from a pool of 13 indicators, for these different city types. Having selected the relevant indicators, utilities can use them as tools to improve their environmental performance. The purpose is to not facilitate inter-utility comparisons within or across city types. Every utility would compare its environmental performance at a given point in time with what it was in the past. Towards the end, the paper also applies the methodology to nine cities across four continents—Europe (Oslo, Trondheim and Turin), Asia (the National Capital Territory of Delhi, Beijing, Tel Aviv and Male), North America (Sacramento) and South America (São Paulo). In all, 13 environmental sustainability indicators have been identified. Two cities—Oslo and Trondheim (both from Norway) belong to the same city type, while the other seven are different from each other in this regard. The number of relevant indicators ranged from 4 for Trondheim to 11 for Tel Aviv. The methodology is not restricted to urban water supply and sewage handling systems. It can be extended to other infrastructure systems as well—waste management, transportation, etc.

[1]  Oddvar G. Lindholm,et al.  Relevance of some criteria for sustainability in a project for disconnecting of storm runoff , 2000 .

[2]  N Funamizu,et al.  Reuse of heat energy in wastewater: implementation examples in Japan. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Energy consumption, costs and environmental impacts for urban water cycle services: Case study of Os , 2011 .

[4]  M. Lundin,et al.  A life cycle assessment based procedure for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems , 2002 .

[5]  Mohamed Ahmed Didi,et al.  Up Close With -- Male Makes the Most of Limited Land and Lack of Freshwater (PDF) , 2011 .

[6]  J N Lester,et al.  Developing a sustainable energy strategy for a water utility. Part II: A review of potential technologies and approaches. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  R. Ashley,et al.  Sustainability Criteria for Decision Support in the UK Water Industry , 2002 .

[8]  Gordon Mitchell,et al.  PROBLEMS AND FUNDAMENTALS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS , 1996 .

[9]  Sverker Molander,et al.  Sustainable development indicators for wastewater systems – researchers and indicator users in a co-operative case study , 2005 .

[10]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Environmental impact analysis of chemicals and energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants: case study of Oslo, Norway. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  C. Buckley,et al.  Selecting sanitation systems for sustainability in developing countries. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  G. Venkatesh,et al.  Malé Makes the Most of Limited Land and Lack of Freshwater , 2011 .

[13]  Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences , 2010 .

[14]  Rita Ugarelli,et al.  Oslo consumers willing to pay more for improved services , 2010 .

[15]  C. Kennedy,et al.  Water Use Model for Quantifying Environmental and Economic Sustainability Indicators , 2007 .

[16]  H. Brattebø,et al.  Combined MFA‐LCA for Analysis of Wastewater Pipeline Networks , 2009 .

[17]  G. Venkatesh,et al.  Assessment of Environmental Impacts of an Aging and Stagnating Water Supply Pipeline Network City of Oslo , 1991 – 2006 , 2012 .

[18]  Richard Ashley,et al.  Performance indicators for wastewater services - towards a manual of best practice , 2003 .

[19]  E Kärrman,et al.  Analysis and evaluation of methodologies to assess technical urban water systems. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  Sverker Molander,et al.  A set of indicators for the assessment of temporal variations in the sustainability of sanitary systems , 1999 .

[21]  P A Malmqvist,et al.  Decision support tools for urban water and wastewater systems--focussing on hazardous flows assessment. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[22]  Matthew Leach,et al.  Bridging the gaps between theory and practice: a service niche approach to urban sustainability indicators , 2008 .

[23]  D. Hellström,et al.  A framework for systems analysis of sustainable urban water management , 2000 .

[24]  Guillermo Yepes Water & wastewater utilities : indicators 2nd edition , 1996 .

[25]  Abraham Tenne Sea water desalination in Israel: Planning, coping with difficulties and economic aspects of long-term risks , 2013 .

[26]  M K Stenstrom,et al.  Appropriate wastewater treatment systems for developing countries: criteria and indictor assessment in Thailand. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.