Computational Tools for Measuring Space-Time Accessibility within Transportation Networks with Dynamic Flow

The space-time prism (STP) and STP-based accessibility measures are powerful techniques for assessing the ability of individuals to travel and participate in activities at different locations and times in a given environment. However, traditional STPs and STP-based accessibility measures ignore spatial and temporal variations in travel times in an urban environment. Factors such as traffic congestion impose increasingly complex and severe constraints on individual travel and activity participation. This paper reports on the development of dynamic STP-based accessibility measures and computational procedures for accessing individual accessibility in networks with time-varying flow. We extend static network-based STPs to the case where network flow and travel velocities vary across time due to congestion. These tools can evaluate the accessibility of travelers under different levels of traffic congestion, alternative network flow control strategies and activity scheduling policies (e.g., flextime and telecommuting).

[1]  W. W,et al.  A MODEL OF COMPLEX TRAVEL BEHAVIOR: PART II-AN OPERATIONAL MODEL , 2002 .

[2]  David E. Boyce,et al.  DYNAMIC ROUTE CHOICE MODEL OF LARGE-SCALE TRAFFIC NETWORK , 1997 .

[3]  J. Prashker,et al.  The Effect of Temporal Constraints on Household Travel Behavior , 1981 .

[4]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Time-space constraints and the formation of trip chains , 1987 .

[5]  Mei-Po Kwan,et al.  Network-based constraints-oriented choice set formation using GIS , 1998 .

[6]  L. Burns Transportation, temporal, and spatial components of accessibility , 1979 .

[7]  George L. Nemhauser,et al.  Optimality Conditions for a Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model , 1978 .

[8]  Stan C. M. Geertman,et al.  GIS and Models of Accessibility Potential: An Application in Planning , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Torsten Hägerstraand WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE IN REGIONAL SCIENCE , 1970 .

[10]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  BASIC PROPERTIES OF URBAN TIME-SPACE PATHS: EMPIRICAL TESTS , 1981 .

[11]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  Measuring Space‐Time Accessibility Benefits within Transportation Networks: Basic Theory and Computational Procedures , 1999 .

[12]  David A. Plane URBAN TRANSPORTATION: POLICY ALTERNATIVES , 1986 .

[13]  Harvey J. Miller,et al.  GIS Software for Measuring Space-Time Accessibility in Transportation Planning and Analysis , 2000, GeoInformatica.

[14]  Bin Ran,et al.  MODELING DYNAMIC TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS : AN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ORIENTED APPROACH. 2ND REV. ED. , 1996 .

[15]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Dynamic network equilibrium research , 1985 .

[16]  S. Hanson GETTING THERE: URBAN TRANSPORTATION IN CONTEXT. , 1995 .

[17]  M Dijst,et al.  INDIVIDUAL ACTION SPACE IN THE CITY. , 1997 .

[18]  Bruce N Janson,et al.  DYNAMIC TRAFFIC MODELING OF THE I-25/HOV CORRIDOR SOUTHEAST OF DENVER , 1995 .

[19]  Terry L. Friesz,et al.  Dynamic Systems, Variational Inequalities and Control Theoretic Models for Predicting Time-Varying Urban Network Flows , 1996, Transp. Sci..

[20]  Deepak K. Merchant,et al.  A Model and an Algorithm for the Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problems , 1978 .

[21]  J. Prashker,et al.  EVALUATION OF ACTIVITY CONSTRAINED CHOICE SETS TO SHOPPING DESTINATION CHOICE MODELLING , 1982 .

[22]  J. Weibull An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility , 1976 .

[23]  T. Hägerstrand What about people in Regional Science? , 1970 .

[24]  H. Chen,et al.  Dynamic Travel Choice Models: A Variational Inequality Approach , 1998 .