Attributive Idea Evaluation: A New Idea Evaluation Method for Corporate Open Innovation Communities

This article introduces a new idea evaluation method, named “Attributive Idea Evaluation†(AIE), for corporate open innovation communities. AIE aims on the contextual integration of all employees’ knowledge and is based on twenty attributes. Assigning these attributes to ideas facilitates intuitive evaluations. Ranking different ideas is enabled by enclosing corresponding numerical values, correlating to success potential. The method generated convincing results when utilized to evaluate innovation ideas within a large German service company, fulfilling most of the requirements for evaluating ideas in early phases of the innovation management process. Additional discussions with the participants and an expert interview confirmed AIE’s utility, usability, and reliability.

[1]  David Arnott,et al.  Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: a design science approach , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  H.Ronald Hamilton,et al.  Screening business development opportunities , 1974 .

[3]  S. R. Rosenthal,et al.  Towards holistic front ends in new product development , 1998 .

[4]  Mohd Syazwan Abdullah,et al.  Ontology-Based Applications for Enterprise Systems and Knowledge Management , 2012 .

[5]  Robert W. Veryzer Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process , 1998 .

[6]  Martin Spann,et al.  Internet-Based Virtual Stock Markets for Business Forecasting , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Screening Models and Growth Scenarios , 2005, Universal Access in Health Telematics.

[8]  Koleman Strumpf,et al.  Historical presidential betting markets , 2004 .

[9]  Burt Perrin,et al.  How to — and How Not to — Evaluate Innovation , 2002 .

[10]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A comparative analysis of R&D project evaluation methods , 2001 .

[11]  Tong Wu,et al.  The research of group decision methods for product design evaluation , 2008, 2008 9th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design and Conceptual Design.

[12]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Justel Daniel,et al.  Evaluation Method for Selecting Innovative Product Concepts With Greater Potential Marketing Succes , 2007 .

[14]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  Expert Support Systems for New Product Development Decision Making: A Modeling Framework and Applications , 1995 .

[15]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[16]  Paul Veerkamp,et al.  Modeling Design Process , 1990, AI Mag..

[17]  Yannis Manolopoulos,et al.  Optimal Service Ordering in Decentralized Queries Over Web Services , 2011, Int. J. Knowl. Based Organ..

[18]  Friedrich Kerka,et al.  Evaluating innovation ideas: a comprehensive approach to New Product Development , 2009 .

[19]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Research in Information Systems , 2010 .

[20]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[21]  A. Bullinger,et al.  Integrating Inside and Outside Innovators: A Sociotechnical Systems Perspective , 2009 .

[22]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Selecting Winning New Product Projects: Using the NewProd System , 1985 .

[23]  Thomas A. Rietz,et al.  Wishes, expectations and actions: a survey on price formation in election stock markets , 1999 .

[24]  G. Mentzas,et al.  Idea selection and Information Aggregation Markets , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.

[25]  Franklin Allen,et al.  Beauty Contests and Iterated Expectations in Asset Markets , 2006 .