Research of Collision Speed Dependency of Pedestrian Head and Chest Injuries Using Human FE Model (THUMS Version 4)

In this research, the collision speed dependency of pedestrian head and chest injuries was investigated using the human FE model THUMS Version 4, independently developed by Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Central R&D Labs, Inc. to predict brain and internal organ injuries. In addition, this research also looked at the relationship between impact speed and fatality risk. The study first verified the biofidelity of the THUMS pedestrian model in terms of body region components, such as the head, chest, and lower extremities, and the whole body. The model closely simulated the impact response of each body region component described in the literature. As for the whole body kinematics, the calculated trajectories of each portion of the body during a collision with a vehicle were a good match with those of post mortem human subjects (PMHS) described in the literature. It was also determined that the model predicted injuries at the locations reported in the PMHS tests. Using the validated THUMS model, this research then looked at the relationship of head and chest injuries with collision speed. Collisions between a pedestrian and an SUV were analyzed at three collision speeds of 30, 40, and 50 km/h. Head injuries did not occur at a collision speed of 30 km/h, but in collisions at 40 and 50 km/h the results suggested that a serious brain injury, known as diffuse axonal injury (DAI), occurred. Furthermore, in regard to the chest area, injuries did not occur at 30 km/h, but at 40 km/h bone fractures in the ribs occurred, and at 50 km/h, in addition to an increase in the number of bone fractures in the ribs, the results suggested that serious injuries to internal organs, such as damage to the heart, also occurred. These results correspond with the trends in accident data that indicate that the fatality risk for pedestrians increases when the collision speed is 40 km/h or higher.

[2]  Koichi Kamiji,et al.  Pedestrian-vehicle interaction: kinematics and injury analysis of four full scale tests , 2008 .

[3]  Joel D Stitzel,et al.  Material properties of human rib cortical bone from dynamic tension coupon testing. , 2005, Stapp car crash journal.

[4]  A A LIEBOW,et al.  Mechanisms in development of interstitial emphysema and air embolism on decompression from depth. , 1958, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  Joel D. Stitzel,et al.  Biofidelity of the SID-IIs and a modified SID-IIs upper extremity: biomechanical properties of the human humerus , 2005 .

[6]  K H Yang,et al.  Development of a computer model to predict aortic rupture due to impact loading. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[7]  Koichi Kamiji,et al.  Injury mechanism of pedestrians impact test with a sport-utility vehicle and mini-van , 2008 .

[8]  Hiroyuki Abe,et al.  Data Book on Mechanical Properties of Living Cells, Tissues, and Organs , 1996 .

[9]  Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.  Kinematic comparison of the Polar-II and PMHS in pedestrian impact tests with a sport-utility vehicle , 2005 .

[10]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Strength of biological materials , 1970 .

[11]  Tsuyoshi Yasuki,et al.  Shigeta 1 DEVELOPMENT OF NEXT GENERATION HUMAN FE MODEL CAPABLE OF ORGAN INJURY PREDICTION , 2009 .

[12]  Tsuyoshi Yasuki,et al.  Development of Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor FE Model and Comparative Study with Leg Behavior of Human FE Model THUMS , 2009 .

[13]  Michael Kleinberger,et al.  THE DYNAMIC RESPONSES OF THE CERVICAL SPINE: BUCKLING, END CONDITIONS, AND TOLERANCE IN COMPRESSIVE IMPACTS , 1997 .

[14]  S. Margulies,et al.  A proposed tolerance criterion for diffuse axonal injury in man. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Dipan Bose,et al.  Response of the knee joint to the pedestrian impact loading environment , 2004 .

[16]  K H Yang,et al.  Development of a finite element model of the human abdomen. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[17]  N. Yoganandan,et al.  Force and Acceleration Corridors from Lateral Head Impact , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[18]  Thomas A. Gennarelli,et al.  Incidence and Severity of Cerebral Concussion in the Rhesus Monkey Following Sagittal Plane Angular Acceleration , 1978 .

[19]  John M. Cavanaugh,et al.  Lower abdominal tolerance and response , 1986 .

[20]  Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.  Pedestrian Lower Extremity Response and Injury: A Small Sedan vs. A Large Sport Utility Vehicle , 2008 .

[21]  Rolf H Eppinger,et al.  On the Development of the SIMon Finite Element Head Model. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[22]  T. Yasuki,et al.  The influence of the Traction Force due to Inertia of the Brain Mass on Traumatic Brain Injury during SUV-to-Pedestrian Impact , 2006 .

[23]  Alan M. Nahum,et al.  Impact tolerance and response of the human thorax II , 1971 .

[24]  Gianiuca Cesari,et al.  BEHAVIOUR OF HUMAN SURROGATES THORAX UNDER BELT LOADING. IN: SEAT BELTS: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ESSENTIAL SAFETY FEATURE , 1990 .

[25]  John W. Melvin,et al.  Impact Injury Mechanisms in Abdominal Organs , 1973 .

[26]  David C. Viano,et al.  Biomechanical responses and injuries in blunt lateral impact , 1989 .

[27]  A J McLean,et al.  Vehicle travel speeds and the incidence of fatal pedestrian crashes. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  King H. Yang,et al.  High-speed seatbelt pretensioner loading of the abdomen. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[29]  Susan S. Margulies,et al.  A study of scaling and head injury criteria using physical model experiments , 1985 .