Analysis of the impact of agglomeration and surface chemistry models on soot formation and oxidation

Abstract Models for soot aggregation that account for the influence of soot surface chemistry on mass growth and oxidation are still at the formative stage. Past studies have considered techniques ranging from the method of moments to stochastic approaches and significantly different sensitivities to chemical processes such as mass growth and oxidation have been reported. The method of moments is computationally efficient and can yield encouraging results for laminar flames as well as for turbulent flames when combined with transported probability density function (PDF) methods. However, an assessment of the sensitivity to constituent model assumptions is not trivial and information regarding the soot size distribution is incomplete. In the current work, the ability of a sectional method to reproduce population dynamics data has been evaluated along with the sensitivity of predictions to closure elements associated with soot nucleation, agglomeration, surface growth and oxidation. A detailed chemistry model with 285 chemical species and 1520 reactions was used for the gas phase. It is shown that the approach to the fuel lean sooting limit can be reproduced with reasonable accuracy and that the inclusion of fractal aggregates and surface chemistry effects improve agreement with experimental data.

[1]  P. Lindstedt Modeling of the chemical complexities of flames , 1998 .

[2]  M. Frenklach,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of Soot Particle Coagulation and Aggregation: Implementation With the Method of Moments and Application to High-Pressure Laminar Premixed Flames , 1998 .

[3]  S. Harris,et al.  Determination of the Rate Constant for Soot Surface Growth , 1983 .

[4]  C. Westbrook,et al.  Modeling of Aromatic and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Formation in Premixed Methane and Ethane Flames , 1996 .

[5]  M. Frenklach,et al.  A detailed kinetic modeling study of aromatics formation in laminar premixed acetylene and ethylene flames , 1997 .

[6]  J. Kent,et al.  Soot measurements in laminar ethylene diffusion flames , 1982 .

[7]  R. Botet,et al.  Aggregation and Fractal Aggregates , 1987 .

[8]  Michael Frenklach,et al.  Numerical simulations of soot aggregation in premixed laminar flames , 2007 .

[9]  Robert W. Bilger,et al.  Modeling soot formation in turbulent methane–air jet diffusion flames , 2000 .

[10]  Jack B. Howard,et al.  Composition profiles and reaction mechanisms in a near-sooting premixed benzene/oxygen/argon flame , 1981 .

[11]  M. Frenklach,et al.  Detailed modeling of soot particle nucleation and growth , 1991 .

[12]  Michael Frenklach,et al.  Reaction mechanism of soot formation in flames , 2002 .

[13]  Henning Bockhorn,et al.  Soot Formation in Combustion: Mechanisms and Models , 1994 .

[14]  Steven N. Rogak,et al.  Study of soot growth in a plug flow reactor using a moving sectional model , 2005 .

[15]  Marshall B. Long,et al.  Soot formation in laminar diffusion flames , 2005 .

[16]  Ian M. Kennedy,et al.  Models of soot formation and oxidation , 1997 .

[17]  Vanni,et al.  Approximate Population Balance Equations for Aggregation-Breakage Processes. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[18]  Jack B. Howard,et al.  ANALYSIS OF SOOT SURFACE GROWTH PATHWAYS USING PUBLISHED PLUG-FLOW REACTOR DATA WITH NEW PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION MEASUREMENTS AND PUBLISHED PREMIXED FLAME DATA , 2000 .

[19]  Jasdeep Singh,et al.  Numerical simulation and sensitivity analysis of detailed soot particle size distribution in laminar premixed ethylene flames , 2006 .

[20]  Tiago L. Farias,et al.  Fractal and projected structure properties of soot aggregates , 1995 .

[21]  M. Frenklach Method of moments with interpolative closure , 2002 .

[22]  S. Pratsinis,et al.  Self-preserving size distributions of agglomerates , 1995 .

[23]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Soot particle size distributions in a well-stirred reactor/plug flow reactor , 2007 .

[24]  Stephen J. Harris,et al.  Surface Growth of Soot Particles in Premixed Ethylene/Air Flames , 1983 .

[25]  H. Bockhorn,et al.  Kinetic modeling of soot formation with detailed chemistry and physics: laminar premixed flames of C2 hydrocarbons , 2000 .

[26]  R. P. Lindstedt,et al.  The formation and oxidation of aromatics in cyclopentene and methyl-cyclopentadiene mixtures , 2002 .

[27]  R. Lindstedt,et al.  Joint-scalar transported PDF modeling of soot formation and oxidation , 2005 .

[28]  Steven N. Rogak,et al.  A novel fixed-sectional model for the formation and growth of aerosol agglomerates , 2004 .

[29]  M. Colvin,et al.  Reaction mechanisms in aromatic hydrocarbon formation involving the C5H5 cyclopentadienyl moiety , 1996 .

[30]  M. Frenklach,et al.  Detailed modeling of soot formation in laminar premixed ethylene flames at a pressure of 10 bar , 1995 .

[31]  Markus Kraft,et al.  Models for the aggregate structure of soot particles , 2007 .

[32]  Jack B. Howard,et al.  Formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their growth to soot—a review of chemical reaction pathways , 2000 .

[33]  C. McEnally,et al.  Investigation of the transition from lightly sooting towards heavily sooting co-flow ethylene diffusion flames , 2004 .

[34]  S. Pratsinis Simultaneous nucleation, condensation, and coagulation in aerosol reactors , 1988 .

[35]  Stephen J. Harris,et al.  The Coagulation of Soot Particles with van der Waals Forces , 1988 .

[36]  L. Maurice,et al.  Thermodynamic and kinetic issues in the formation and oxidation of aromatic species. , 2001, Faraday discussions.

[37]  P. Roth,et al.  High temperature oxidation of suspended soot particles verified by CO and CO2 measurements , 1991 .