Managing knowledge in open innovation processes: an intellectual property perspective

Purpose As firms turn their innovation activities toward collaborating with external partners, they face additional challenges in managing their knowledge. While different modes of intellectual property right regimes are applied in closed innovation systems, there seems to be tension between the concepts of “open innovation” and “intellectual property rights”. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how firms best manage knowledge via intellectual property rights in open innovation processes. Design/methodology/approach Following a mixed methods approach, the authors review relevant literature at the intersection of knowledge management, intellectual property rights, strategic management of intellectual property rights and the open innovation process. The authors identify success drivers through the lenses of – but not limited to – intellectual property rights and classify them in five distinct groups. Expending the view on open innovation beyond its modus operandi, the authors develop the Open Innovation Life Cycle, covering three stages and three levels of the open innovation process. The authors apply their findings to a case study in the pharmaceutical industry. Findings The authors provide four key contributions. First, existing literature yields inconclusive results concerning the enabling or disabling function of intellectual property rights in open innovation processes, but the majority of scholars detect an ambivalent relation. Second, they identify and classify success drivers of successful knowledge management via intellectual property rights in open innovation processes. Third, they advance literature on open innovation beyond its modus operandi to include three stages and three levels. Fourth, they test their findings to a case study and show how management leverages knowledge by properly using intellectual property rights in open innovation. Practical implications The findings support firms in managing knowledge via intellectual property rights in open innovation processes. Management should account for the peculiarities of open innovation preparation and open innovation termination to prevent unintentional knowledge drain. Originality/value This is one of the first studies to view open innovation as a process beyond its modus operandi by considering the preparations for and termination of open innovation activities. It also addresses the levels involved in managing knowledge via intellectual property rights in open innovation from individual (personal) to project and firm level.

[1]  H. Ernst,et al.  How to develop a successful technology licensing program , 2011 .

[2]  A. Salter,et al.  The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration , 2014 .

[3]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Perspective: The Stage‐Gate® Idea‐to‐Launch Process—Update, What's New, and NexGen Systems* , 2008 .

[4]  Anne Layne-Farrar,et al.  Software Patents and Open Source: The Battle Over Intellectual Property Rights , 2004 .

[5]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[6]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[7]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques , 1994 .

[8]  D. Teece,et al.  How to Capture Value from Innovation: Shaping Intellectual Property and Industry Architecture , 2007 .

[9]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  The role of contracts and intellectual property rights in open innovation , 2015, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[10]  S. Erzurumlu,et al.  Collaborative Product Development with Competitors to Stimulate Downstream Innovation , 2010 .

[11]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study , 1997, MIS Q..

[12]  K. Munsch Open Model Innovation , 2009 .

[13]  Nari Lee Exclusion and coordination in collaborative innovation and patent law , 2009 .

[14]  R. Boschma Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[15]  Joseph Feller,et al.  Institutionalising information asymmetry: governance structures for open innovation , 2009, Inf. Technol. People.

[16]  Martin W. Wallin,et al.  Organizing for Open Innovation:: Focus on the Integration of Knowledge , 2010 .

[17]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[18]  Joachim Henkel,et al.  IP Modularity: Profiting from Innovation by Aligning Product Architecture with Intellectual Property , 2012 .

[19]  H. Chesbrough The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[20]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[21]  H. Chesbrough Open Innovation: Where We've Been and Where We're Going , 2012 .

[22]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Intellectual property and open innovation: an empirical analysis , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[23]  Dries Faems,et al.  Building Appropriation Advantage: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Intellectual Property Management , 2013 .

[25]  O. Gassmann,et al.  The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .

[26]  Denise Rosemary Nicholson World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)'s General Assembly in Geneva , 2006 .

[27]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon , 2009 .

[28]  Dirk Voelkel,et al.  Managing Open Innovation in Biotechnology , 2006 .

[29]  W. H. Hoffmann,et al.  Success Factors of Strategic Alliances in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises—An Empirical Survey , 2001 .

[30]  J. Hagedoorn Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[31]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes , 2004 .

[32]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .

[33]  Zhenglong Peng,et al.  The Emerging Knowledge Governance Approach within Open Innovation: Its Antecedent Factors and Interior Mechanism , 2011 .

[34]  M. Grimaldi,et al.  Enabling Open Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach , 2013 .

[35]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Recovering Abandoned Compounds through Expanded External IP Licensing , 2013 .

[36]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[37]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property , 2003 .

[38]  Soili Nystén-Haarala,et al.  Interfacing Intellectual Property Rights and Open Innovation , 2010 .

[39]  Lance R. Newey,et al.  WEARING DIFFERENT HATS: HOW ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY DIFFERS IN OPEN INNOVATION , 2010 .

[40]  Onno S. W. F. Omta,et al.  Identification of Competencies for Professionals in Open Innovation Teams , 2010 .

[41]  Chiara Verbano,et al.  Open innovation and new issues in R&D organization and personnel management , 2012 .

[42]  R. Manzini,et al.  Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms in Collaborative New Product Development , 2016 .

[43]  Susie Stephens,et al.  Is open innovation the way forward for big pharma? , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[44]  K. Blind,et al.  How Open is Too Open? The Mitigating Role of Appropriation Mechanisms in R&D Cooperation Settings , 2016 .

[45]  R. Silverman Basic science to blockbuster drug: invention of pregabalin (Lyrica®) , 2016 .

[46]  Jonas Kuschel,et al.  Open Innovation and Control: A Case from Volvo , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[47]  O. Granstrand,et al.  The Challenge of Closing Open Innovation: The Intellectual Property Disassembly Problem , 2014 .

[48]  Volker Bilgram,et al.  Getting Closer to the Consumer – How Nivea Co-Creates New Products , 2011 .

[49]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[50]  Erk P. Piening,et al.  Don't Get Caught on the Wrong Foot: A Resource-based Perspective on Imitation Threats in Innovation Partnerships , 2017 .

[51]  John P. Rice,et al.  The role of absorptive capacity in facilitating "open innovation" outcomes: A study of Australian SMEs in the manufacturing sector , 2009 .

[52]  O. Granstrand,et al.  Intellectual Property and Licensing Strategies in Open Collaborative Innovation , 2012 .

[53]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Protecting Growth Options in Dynamic Markets: The Role of Strategic Disclosure in Integrated Intellectual Property Strategies , 2013 .

[54]  Joachim Henkel,et al.  Modularity and Intellectual Property Protection , 2014 .

[55]  William W. Fisher,et al.  Strategic Management of Intellectual Property: An Integrated Approach , 2013 .

[56]  Marine Agogué,et al.  RETHINKING THE ROLE OF INTERMEDIARIES AS AN ARCHITECT OF COLLECTIVE EXPLORATION AND CREATION OF KNOWLEDGE IN OPEN INNOVATION , 2013 .

[57]  Robert Kirschbaum,et al.  Open Innovation In Practice , 2005 .

[58]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Does IP strategy have to cripple open innovation , 2009 .

[59]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Open innovation, contracts, and intellectual property rights: an exploratory empirical study , 2012 .

[60]  T. Fetterhoff,et al.  The Challenges in Implementing Open Innovation in a Global Innovation-Driven Corporation , 2012 .

[61]  Anne L. J. Ter Wal,et al.  Coping with Open Innovation: Responding to the Challenges of External Engagement in R&D , 2014 .

[62]  P. D. Laat Copyright or copyleft?: An analysis of property regimes for software development , 2005 .

[63]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[64]  J. Hagedoorn Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 , 2002 .

[65]  Erk P. Piening,et al.  HARNESSING THE VALUE OF OPEN INNOVATION: THE MODERATING ROLE OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT , 2012 .

[66]  J. Rodríguez,et al.  Open Innovation: Organizational Challenges of a New Paradigm of Innovation Management , 2011 .

[67]  H. Gemünden,et al.  The impact of a company's business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success , 2004 .

[68]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards the (Strategic) Management of Intellectual Property: Retrospective and Prospective , 2013 .

[69]  Susanne Ollila,et al.  Managing Open Innovation: Exploring Challenges at the Interfaces of an Open Innovation Arena , 2011 .

[70]  M. Perkmann,et al.  University Industry Relationships and Open Innovation: Towards a Research Agenda , 2007 .

[71]  Eugenia Georgiades Resolving conflicting interests: software patents versus open source , 2011 .

[72]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Open Versus Closed Innovation: A Model of Discovery and Divergence , 2010 .

[73]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[74]  Peter M. Bican,et al.  Value Articulation: A Framework for the Strategic Management of Intellectual Property , 2013 .

[75]  M. Dodgson,et al.  The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & Gamble , 2006 .