Norms and Validity of the DriVR: A Virtual Reality Driving Assessment for Persons with Head Injuries

This article presents the results of two studies of a new driving simulator called "DriVR." The first, normative study examined the performance of an uninjured driving population on the simulator. The driving ability of 148 participants in eight age categories was assessed using DriVR. The second, discriminative validity study examined DriVR's ability to discriminate between the performance of head-injured and uninjured adults. We administered the DriVR assessment to 17 head-injured adults. The performance of this group was compared to that of a subgroup of uninjured participants that matched the brain-injured participants in age, gender, and years of education. In general, DriVR's measures showed age-related changes in participant performance and were able to discriminate between head-injured and uninjured participants. These results suggested that age norms would be useful for analyzing the performance of head-injured clients who are being assessed with DriVR. It should be noted, however, that these studies did not examine DriVR's ability to predict performance in real, on-the-road tests.

[1]  Benjamin Watson,et al.  Virtually conquering fear of flying , 1996, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[2]  Rob Kooper,et al.  Virtual Environments for Treating the Fear of Heights , 1995, Computer.

[3]  Dorothy Strickland,et al.  A Virtual Reality Application with Autistic Children , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[4]  Brenda K. Wiederhold,et al.  A Review of Virtual Reality as a Psychotherapeutic Tool , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[5]  Larry F. Hodges,et al.  Overcoming phobias by virtual exposure , 1997, CACM.

[6]  T. Galski,et al.  Prediction of behind-the-wheel driving performance in patients with cerebral brain damage: a discriminant function analysis. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[7]  Nathaniel I. Durlach,et al.  Virtual Reality (VR) and Psychotherapy: Opportunities and Challenges , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[8]  V Sahgal,et al.  Driving safety after brain damage: follow-up of twenty-two patients with matched controls. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  Barbara S. Handler,et al.  Driving after Brain Injury , 1995 .

[10]  J. Delisa,et al.  Assessing the driving potential of cerebral vascular accident patients. , 1983, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[11]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  The psychometrics of cybersickness , 1997, CACM.

[12]  Lise R. Talbot,et al.  Assessing Ability to Drive following an Acute Neurological Event: Are We on the Right Road? , 1994, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[13]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  The Virtual Environment for Body-Image Modification (VEBIM): Development and Preliminary Evaluation , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[14]  W H Brouwer,et al.  Acquired brain damage and driving: a review. , 1987, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Postural instability induced by virtual reality exposure: Development of a certification protocol , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  T. Galski,et al.  Driving after cerebral damage: a model with implications for evaluation. , 1992, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[17]  Nives Cimolino,et al.  The Contribution of a Driving Simulator in the Driving Evaluation of Stroke and Disabled Adolescent Clients , 1986 .

[18]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  Virtual Reality in Psychological Assessment: The Body Image Virtual Reality Scale , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  Max M. North,et al.  Effectiveness of Virtual Environment Desensitization in the Treatment of Agoraphobia , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[20]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Basic Issues in the Application of Virtual Reality for the Assessment and Rehabilitation of Cognitive Impairments and Functional Disabilities , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[21]  Tim Bowman.  VR meets physical therapy , 1997, CACM.

[22]  S. Weghorst,et al.  Virtual reality and tactile augmentation in the treatment of spider phobia: a case report. , 1997, Behaviour research and therapy.

[23]  Laura Mendozzi,et al.  The Application of Virtual Reality to Document Coping Deficits After a Stroke: Report of a Case , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[24]  Kay M. Stanney,et al.  Development and testing of a measure of the kinesthetic position sense used to assess the aftereffects from virtual environment exposure , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE 1997 Annual International Symposium on Virtual Reality.

[25]  Michitaka Hirose,et al.  Virtual Sand Box:Development of an Application of Virtual Environments for Clinical Medicine , 1994, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[26]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Virtual environments in special-needs education , 1997, CACM.

[27]  Nigel Foreman,et al.  VR and spatial awareness in disabled children , 1997, CACM.