Hybrid Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms

This paper examines how the search ability of evolutionar y multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithms can be improved by the hybri dization with local search through computational experiments on multi-objective pe rmutation flowshop scheduling problems. The task of EMO algorithms is to find a variety of nondominated solutions of multi-objective optimization prob lems. First we describe our multi-objective genetic local search (MOGLS) algorithm, w hich is the hybridization of a simple EMO algorithm with local search. Next we disc us some implementation issues of local search in our MOGLS algorithm such as the choice of initial (i.e., starting) solutions for local search and a termination c ondition of local search. Then we implement hybrid EMO algorithms using well-known EMO al gorithms: SPEA and NSGA-II. Finally we compare those EMO algorithms wit h their hybrid versions through computational experiments. Experimental results show that the hybridization with local search can improve the search ability of the EMO algorithms when local search is appropriately implemented in their hybrid versi ons.

[1]  David W. Corne,et al.  Approximating the Nondominated Front Using the Pareto Archived Evolution Strategy , 2000, Evolutionary Computation.

[2]  Andrzej Jaszkiewicz,et al.  Genetic local search for multi-objective combinatorial optimization , 2022 .

[3]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[4]  Pablo Moscato,et al.  Memetic algorithms: a short introduction , 1999 .

[5]  DebK.,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm , 2002 .

[6]  H. Ishibuchi,et al.  MOGA: multi-objective genetic algorithms , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation.

[7]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Multi-objective genetic local search algorithm , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation.

[8]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Balance Between Genetic Search And Local Search In Hybrid Evolutionary Multi-criterion Optimization Algorithms , 2002, GECCO.

[9]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[10]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  A multi-objective genetic local search algorithm and its application to flowshop scheduling , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[11]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Selection of initial solutions for local search in multiobjective genetic local search , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).

[12]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[13]  DebKalyanmoy Multi-objective genetic algorithms , 1999 .

[14]  Joshua D. Knowles,et al.  M-PAES: a memetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512).