Machine Learning to Classify Intracardiac Electrical Patterns During Atrial Fibrillation

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: Advances in ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) continue to be hindered by ambiguities in mapping, even between experts. We hypothesized that convolutional neural networks (CNN) may enable objective analysis of intracardiac activation in AF, which could be applied clinically if CNN classifications could also be explained. Methods: We performed panoramic recording of bi-atrial electrical signals in AF. We used the Hilbert-transform to produce 175 000 image grids in 35 patients, labeled for rotational activation by experts who showed consistency but with variability (kappa [κ]=0.79). In each patient, ablation terminated AF. A CNN was developed and trained on 100 000 AF image grids, validated on 25 000 grids, then tested on a separate 50 000 grids. Results: In the separate test cohort (50 000 grids), CNN reproducibly classified AF image grids into those with/without rotational sites with 95.0% accuracy (CI, 94.8%–95.2%). This accuracy exceeded that of support vector machines, traditional linear discriminant, and k-nearest neighbor statistical analyses. To probe the CNN, we applied gradient-weighted class activation mapping which revealed that the decision logic closely mimicked rules used by experts (C statistic 0.96). Conclusions: CNNs improved the classification of intracardiac AF maps compared with other analyses and agreed with expert evaluation. Novel explainability analyses revealed that the CNN operated using a decision logic similar to rules used by experts, even though these rules were not provided in training. We thus describe a scaleable platform for robust comparisons of complex AF data from multiple systems, which may provide immediate clinical utility to guide ablation. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02997254.

[1]  J. Uhm,et al.  The Electrical Isolation of the Left Atrial Posterior Wall in Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. , 2019, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[2]  R. Hunter,et al.  Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Using Stochastic Trajectory Analysis of Ranked Signals (STAR) Mapping Method. , 2019, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[3]  U. Landmesser,et al.  Velocity characteristics of atrial fibrillation sources determined by electrographic flow mapping before and after catheter ablation. , 2019, International journal of cardiology.

[4]  A. Verma,et al.  Targeting Nonpulmonary Vein Sources in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Identified by Noncontact Charge Density Mapping. , 2019, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[5]  Paul J. Wang,et al.  Comparing phase and electrographic flow mapping for persistent atrial fibrillation , 2019, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  A. Verma,et al.  High-resolution noncontact charge-density mapping of endocardial activation. , 2019, JCI insight.

[7]  Kipp W. Johnson,et al.  Deep learning for cardiovascular medicine: a practical primer. , 2019, European heart journal.

[8]  Eric J Topol,et al.  High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[9]  Masoumeh Haghpanahi,et al.  Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network , 2019, Nature Medicine.

[10]  T. Chao,et al.  Comparison of phase mapping and electrogram‐based driver mapping for catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation , 2018, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[11]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Human Atrial Fibrillation Drivers Resolved With Integrated Functional and Structural Imaging to Benefit Clinical Mapping. , 2018, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[12]  R. Mahajan,et al.  Outcomes of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2018, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[13]  Yariv A. Amos,et al.  Characterization and significance of localized sources identified by a novel automated algorithm during mapping of human persistent atrial fibrillation , 2018, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[14]  Tommi S. Jaakkola,et al.  On the Robustness of Interpretability Methods , 2018, ArXiv.

[15]  Paul J. Wang,et al.  Interaction of Localized Drivers and Disorganized Activation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Reconciling Putative Mechanisms Using Multiple Mapping Techniques , 2018, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[16]  Martin Krzywinski,et al.  The curse(s) of dimensionality , 2018, Nature Methods.

[17]  B. Lindsay,et al.  Smartwatch Algorithm for Automated Detection of Atrial Fibrillation. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  Paul J. Wang,et al.  Clinical Implications of Ablation of Drivers for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2018, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[19]  N. Sohoni,et al.  Passive Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using a Commercially Available Smartwatch , 2018, JAMA cardiology.

[20]  Vitaly Kalinin,et al.  Noninvasive phase mapping of persistent atrial fibrillation in humans: Comparison with invasive catheter mapping , 2017, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[21]  G. Dhillon,et al.  A Novel Mapping System for Panoramic Mapping of the Left Atrium , 2017, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[22]  Paul J. Wang,et al.  Identification and Characterization of Sites Where Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Is Terminated by Localized Ablation , 2018, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[23]  P. Nery,et al.  Efficacy and safety of driver‐guided catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[24]  Malcolm Finlay,et al.  Panoramic atrial mapping with basket catheters: A quantitative analysis to optimize practice, patient selection, and catheter choice , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[25]  Paul J. Wang,et al.  Two Independent Mapping Techniques Identify Rotational Activity Patterns at Sites of Local Termination During Persistent Atrial Fibrillation , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[26]  Gopi Dandamudi,et al.  Clinical Benefit of Ablating Localized Sources for Human Atrial Fibrillation: The Indiana University FIRM Registry. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  E. Daoud,et al.  Identification of Repetitive Activation Patterns Using Novel Computational Analysis of Multielectrode Recordings During Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter in Humans. , 2017, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[28]  Omer Berenfeld,et al.  AF Ablation Guided by Spatiotemporal Electrogram Dispersion Without Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Wholly Patient-Tailored Approach. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  Abhishek Das,et al.  Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization , 2016, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[30]  Carlos Guestrin,et al.  "Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier , 2016, ArXiv.

[31]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Understanding Neural Networks Through Deep Visualization , 2015, ArXiv.

[32]  Oliver R. Segal,et al.  Is There Still a Role for Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrogram Ablation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation?: Meta-Analysis of 1415 Patients , 2015, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[33]  Pawel Kuklik,et al.  Reconstruction of Instantaneous Phase of Unipolar Atrial Contact Electrogram Using a Concept of Sinusoidal Recomposition and Hilbert Transform , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  José Jalife,et al.  Comparison of radiofrequency catheter ablation of drivers and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation: a noninferiority randomized multicenter RADAR-AF trial. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  Omer Berenfeld,et al.  Body surface localization of left and right atrial high-frequency rotors in atrial fibrillation patients: a clinical-computational study. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[36]  Ashok J. Shah,et al.  Driver Domains in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation , 2014, Circulation.

[37]  Rob Fergus,et al.  Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks , 2013, ECCV.

[38]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[39]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Treatment of atrial fibrillation by the ablation of localized sources: CONFIRM (Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation) trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[40]  Nicolas Derval,et al.  Classifying fractionated electrograms in human atrial fibrillation using monophasic action potentials and activation mapping: evidence for localized drivers, rate acceleration, and nonlocal signal etiologies. , 2011, Heart rhythm.

[41]  F. Balloux,et al.  Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations , 2010, BMC Genetics.

[42]  Omer Berenfeld,et al.  Rotor meandering contributes to irregularity in electrograms during atrial fibrillation. , 2008, Heart rhythm.

[43]  Robert Ploutz-Snyder,et al.  Mechanisms of Wave Fractionation at Boundaries of High-Frequency Excitation in the Posterior Left Atrium of the Isolated Sheep Heart During Atrial Fibrillation , 2006, Circulation.