Using the Semantic Web and Web Apps to Connect Radiologists and Oncologists

Medical imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cancer. Quantitative and qualitative data about medical images are vital components of a radiological report and are very important to the oncologist that requests the radiological exams. However, traditional methods to register these data are inefficient and error prone. The use of unstructured free text in radiology reports makes it impossible to perform even simple calculations, such as changes in lesion dimensions. It also makes the aggregated analysis of many reports difficult. Free text reports lack a reference to the image regions of the finds they refer to and are not machine-computable. This paper proposes a method to provide support for collaborative work among radiologists and oncologists (providing care or taking part in clinical trials) using an imaging web tool, ePAD, to generate structured radiology reports that can be machine-computable. It also shows how ePAD uses Rad Lex ontology terms and the Annotation and Image Markup (AIM) language (and templates) to generate the reports.

[1]  R H Choplin,et al.  Picture archiving and communication systems: an overview. , 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  Tool Support to Enable Evaluation of the Clinical Response to Treatment , 2008, AMIA.

[3]  Cornelius Rosse,et al.  The Foundational Model of Anatomy Ontology , 2008, Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics.

[4]  Curtis P Langlotz,et al.  A framework for improving radiology reporting. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[5]  Mor Peleg Sharable Appropriateness Criteria in GLIF3 Using Standards and the Knowledge-Data Ontology Mapper , 2009, KR4HC.

[6]  Albert Burger,et al.  Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics, Principles and Practice , 2010, Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics.

[7]  Bradley J. Erickson,et al.  Open Source Software Projects of the caBIG™ In Vivo Imaging Workspace Software Special Interest Group , 2007, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  Osman Ratib,et al.  OsiriX: An Open-Source Software for Navigating in Multidimensional DICOM Images , 2004, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  iPad: Semantic Annotation and Markup of Radiological Images , 2008, AMIA.

[10]  Gregory Taylor,et al.  Current and future , 1998 .

[11]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[12]  C. Langlotz RadLex: a new method for indexing online educational materials. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[13]  David A Clunie,et al.  DICOM Structured Reporting and Cancer Clinical Trials Results , 2007, Cancer informatics.

[14]  Daniel L Rubin,et al.  Current and Future Trends in Imaging Informatics for Oncology , 2011, Cancer journal.

[15]  Barry,et al.  Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics: Principles and Practice , 2008 .

[16]  Tracy A Jaffe,et al.  Quantitative imaging in oncology patients: Part 1, radiology practice patterns at major U.S. cancer centers. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  DICOM structured reporting: Part 1. Overview and characteristics. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[18]  Tracy A Jaffe,et al.  Quantitative imaging in oncology patients: Part 2, oncologists' opinions and expectations at major U.S. cancer centers. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  R. Graham,et al.  DICOM demystified: a review of digital file formats and their use in radiological practice. , 2005, Clinical radiology.