Endoscopes and devices to improve colon polyp detection.

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Technology Committee provides reviews of existing, new, or emerging endoscopic technologies that have an impact on the practice of GI endoscopy. Evidence-based methodology is used, with a MEDLINE literature search to identify pertinent clinical studies on the topic, and a MAUDE (Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health) database search to identify the reported adverse events of a given technology. Both are supplemented by accessing the “related articles” feature of PubMed and by scrutinizing pertinent references cited by the identified studies. Controlled clinical trials are emphasized, but, in many cases, data from randomized, controlled trials are lacking. In such cases, large case series, preliminary clinical studies, and expert opinions are used. Technical data are gathered from traditional and Web-based publications, proprietary publications, and informal communications with pertinent vendors. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are drafted by 1 or 2 members of the ASGE Technology Committee, reviewed and edited by the committee as a whole, and approved by the governing board of the ASGE. When financial guidance is indicated, the most recent coding data and list prices at the time of publication are provided. For this review the MEDLINE database was searched through March 2014 for articles related to endoscopy in patients with colon polyps by using the keywords “colon polyp,” “colon adenoma,” and “colon neoplasm” paired with “colonoscopy,” “third eye retroscope,” “cap-fitted,” “cap-assisted,” “transparent cap,” “retroflexion,” “cuff,” “endoscope,” “colonoscope,” “detection,” “wide-angle,” and “full spectrum endoscope.” Technology Status Evaluation Reports are scientific reviews provided solely for educational and informational purposes. Technology Status Evaluation Reports are not rules and should not be construed as establishing a legal standard of care or as encouraging, advocating, requiring, or discouraging any particular treatment or payment for such treatment.

[1]  H. Inoue,et al.  Feasibility of the transparent cap-fitted colonoscope for screening and mucosal resection , 1997, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[2]  D. Rex,et al.  170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. , 2004, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[3]  S. Connor,et al.  Transparent Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy Versus Standard Adult Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2012, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[4]  J. Llach,et al.  Impact of wide-angle, high-definition endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[5]  Z. Halpern,et al.  A prospective cohort study evaluating a novel colonoscopy platform featuring full-spectrum endoscopy , 2013, Endoscopy.

[6]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2014 , 2014, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  A. Heinecke,et al.  Novel Endocuff-assisted Colonoscopy Significantly Increases the Polyp Detection Rate: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[8]  K. Okazaki,et al.  Efficacy of Total Colonoscopy with a Transparent Cap in Comparison with Colonoscopy without the Cap , 1998, Endoscopy.

[9]  G. Triadafilopoulos,et al.  A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Third Eye retrograde auxiliary imaging system during colonoscopy. , 2008, Endoscopy.

[10]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[11]  Jacques Van Dam,et al.  A novel retrograde-viewing auxiliary imaging device (Third Eye Retroscope) improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomic models of the colon. , 2006, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

[12]  A. Rastogi Cap-assisted colonoscopy. , 2013, Gastroenterology clinics of North America.

[13]  Ralph B D'Agostino,et al.  Standard forward-viewing colonoscopy versus full-spectrum endoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem colonoscopy trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  R. Nelson,et al.  Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy to improve caecal intubation. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  Wataru Iwai,et al.  Impact of a transparent hood on the performance of total colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[16]  Peter D Siersema,et al.  Comparison of standard forward-viewing mode versus ultrawide-viewing mode of a novel colonoscopy platform: a prospective, multicenter study in the detection of simulated polyps in an in vitro colon model (with video). , 2013, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[17]  Alessandro Repici,et al.  Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study. , 2011, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[18]  S. Moss,et al.  Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program , 2014, Endoscopy.

[19]  J. Sung,et al.  Improved Colonoscopy Success Rate with a Distally Attached Mucosectomy Cap , 2006, Endoscopy.

[20]  Z. Tsiamoulos,et al.  A new accessory, endoscopic cuff, improves colonoscopic access for complex polyp resection and scar assessment in the sigmoid colon (with video). , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[21]  T. Frieling,et al.  Prospective and Randomized Study to Evaluate the Clinical Impact of Cap Assisted Colonoscopy (CAC) , 2013, Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.

[22]  D. Rex,et al.  A retrograde-viewing device improves detection of adenomas in the colon: a prospective efficacy evaluation (with videos). , 2010, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[23]  G. Dafnis Technical Considerations and Patient Comfort in Total Colonoscopy with and without a Transparent Cap: Initial Experiences from a Pilot Study , 2000, Endoscopy.

[24]  Shinji Tanaka,et al.  A novel extra-wide-angle-view colonoscope: a simulated pilot study using anatomic colorectal models. , 2013, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[25]  William M. Tierney,et al.  Narrow band imaging and multiband imaging. , 2008, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[26]  Ralf Kiesslich,et al.  A novel balloon colonoscope detects significantly more simulated polyps than a standard colonoscope in a colon model. , 2014, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[27]  S. Ng,et al.  The Effi cacy of Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy in Polyp Detection and Cecal Intubation : A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2012 .

[28]  S. Moss,et al.  Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: evidence from the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England , 2012, Endoscopy.

[29]  V. Wong,et al.  Efficacy of Cap-Assisted Colonoscopy in Comparison With Regular Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[30]  Paul Collins,et al.  Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy , 2007 .

[31]  A. Suissa,et al.  Safety and efficacy of a novel balloon colonoscope: a prospective cohort study , 2014, Endoscopy.

[32]  Richard S. Kwon,et al.  Update on CT colonography. , 2009, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[33]  Moshe Rubin,et al.  Mo1517 Successful Deployment and Use of Third Eye Panoramic™ a Novel Side Viewing Video CAP Fitted on a Standard Colonoscope , 2014 .

[34]  P. Maisonneuve,et al.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps. , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[35]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial. , 2008, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[36]  P. Lenz,et al.  Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy: a new accessory to improve adenoma detection rate? Technical aspects and first clinical experiences , 2014, Endoscopy.

[37]  Walter G. Park,et al.  Short turn radius colonoscope in an anatomical model: retroflexed withdrawal and detection of hidden polyps. , 2015, World journal of gastroenterology.

[38]  A. Rastogi,et al.  Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial , 2011, Gut.

[39]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  170° Wide-Angle Colonoscope: Effect on Efficiency and Miss Rates , 2004, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[40]  A. Horiuchi,et al.  Improved Colorectal Adenoma Detection With a Transparent Retractable Extension Device , 2008, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[41]  Douglas K Rex,et al.  Maximizing Detection of Adenomas and Cancers During Colonoscopy , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[42]  Y. Yamaji,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Usefulness of a Transparent Hood Attached to the Tip of the Colonoscope , 2007, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[43]  Steve Halligan,et al.  Surface Visualization at CT Colonography Simulated Colonoscopy: Effect of Varying Field of View and Retrograde View , 2007, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[44]  Peter D Siersema,et al.  Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy. , 2014, World journal of gastroenterology.

[45]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Polyp Miss Rate Determined by Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review , 2006, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[46]  D. Demarco,et al.  Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. , 2010, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[47]  E. Kuipers,et al.  Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial , 2011, Gut.