Surrogate modeling for peak or time-dependent storm surge prediction over an extended coastal region using an existing database of synthetic storms

This paper investigates the development of a kriging surrogate model for storm surge prediction utilizing an existing database of high-fidelity, synthetic storms. This surrogate model (metamodel) provides a fast-to-compute mathematical approximation to the input/output relationship of the computationally expensive simulation model that created this database. The implementation is considered over a large coastal region composed of nearshore nodes (locations where storm surge is predicted) and further examines the ability to provide time-series forecasting. This setting creates a high-dimensional output (over a few thousand surge responses) for the surrogate model with anticipated high spatial/temporal correlation. Kriging is considered as a surrogate model, and special attention is given to the appropriate parameterization of the synthetic storms, based on the characteristics of the given database, to determine the input for the metamodel formulation. Principal component analysis (PCA) is integrated in this formulation as a dimension reduction technique to improve computational efficiency, as well as to provide accurate and continuous predictions for time-dependent outputs without the need to introduce time averaging in the time-series forecasting. This is established by leveraging the aforementioned correlation characteristics within the initial database. A range of different implementation choices is examined within the integrated kriging/PCA setting, such as the development of single or multiple metamodels for the different outputs. The metamodel accuracy for inland nodes that have remained dry in some of the storms in the initial database is also examined. The performance of the surrogate modeling approach is evaluated through a case study, utilizing a database of 446 synthetic storms for the Gulf of Mexico (Louisiana coast). The output considered includes time histories for 30 locations over a period of 45.5 h with 92 uniform time steps, as well as peak responses over a grid of 545,635 nearshore nodes. High accuracy and computational efficiency are observed for the proposed implementation, whereas including the prediction error statistics provides estimations with significant safety margins.

[1]  Youn Kyung Song,et al.  Regional attributes of hurricane surge response functions for hazard assessment , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[2]  Clint Dawson,et al.  Scalability of an Unstructured Grid Continuous Galerkin Based Hurricane Storm Surge Model , 2011, J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  Christopher W. Reed,et al.  Efficient Strategies for the Joint Probability Evaluation of Storm Surge Hazards , 2008 .

[4]  Søren Nymand Lophaven,et al.  DACE - A Matlab Kriging Toolbox , 2002 .

[5]  Michael E. Tipping,et al.  Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis , 1999 .

[6]  M. Zijlema Computation of wind-wave spectra in coastal waters with SWAN on unstructured grids , 2010 .

[7]  Bertrand Iooss,et al.  Numerical Study of the Metamodel Validation Process , 2009, 2009 First International Conference on Advances in System Simulation.

[8]  Jeffrey A. Melby,et al.  A time-dependent surrogate model for storm surge prediction based on an artificial neural network using high-fidelity synthetic hurricane modeling , 2015, Natural Hazards.

[9]  A. Zundel,et al.  STWAVE: Steady-State Spectral Wave Model. Report 1: User's Manual for STWAVE Version 2.0 , 1999 .

[10]  Marcel Zijlema,et al.  Modeling hurricane waves and storm surge using integrally-coupled, scalable computations , 2011 .

[11]  G. Holland An Analytic Model of the Wind and Pressure Profiles in Hurricanes , 1980 .

[12]  Donald T. Resio,et al.  STWAVE: Steady-State Spectral Wave Model User's Manual for STWAVE, Version 3.0 , 2001 .

[13]  Joannes J. Westerink,et al.  U.S. IOOS coastal and ocean modeling testbed: Evaluation of tide, wave, and hurricane surge response sensitivities to mesh resolution and friction in the Gulf of Mexico , 2013 .

[14]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Implementation/optimization of moving least squares response surfaces for approximation of hurricane/storm surge and wave responses , 2013, Natural Hazards.

[15]  J. Feyen,et al.  A Basin to Channel-Scale Unstructured Grid Hurricane Storm Surge Model Applied to Southern Louisiana , 2008 .

[16]  K. Cheung,et al.  Modeling of storm-induced coastal flooding for emergency management , 2003 .

[17]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[18]  Christopher W. Reed,et al.  Efficient joint-probability methods for hurricane surge frequency analysis , 2010 .

[19]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[20]  J. Westerink,et al.  Modeling the physics of storm surges , 2008 .

[21]  Christian Noon,et al.  A Study of Different Metamodeling Techniques for Conceptual Design , 2009, DAC 2009.

[22]  Donald T. Resio,et al.  A surge response function approach to coastal hazard assessment – part 1: basic concepts , 2009 .

[23]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Tropical cyclone inundation potential on the Hawaiian Islands of Oahu and Kauai , 2012 .

[24]  Tao Chen,et al.  Efficient meta-modelling of complex process simulations with time-space-dependent outputs , 2011, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[25]  Norman W. Scheffner,et al.  ADCIRC: An Advanced Three-Dimensional Circulation Model for Shelves, Coasts, and Estuaries. Report 1. Theory and Methodology of ADCIRC-2DDI and ADCIRC-3DL. , 1992 .

[26]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Application-driven sequential designs for simulation experiments: Kriging metamodelling , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[27]  Jamie Rhome,et al.  An Automated Operational Storm Surge Prediction System for the National Hurricane Center , 2012 .

[28]  J. Beven,et al.  Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Sandy , 2013 .

[29]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Kriging metamodeling for approximation of high-dimensional wave and surge responses in real-time storm/hurricane risk assessment , 2013 .

[30]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[31]  T. Simpson,et al.  Computationally Inexpensive Metamodel Assessment Strategies , 2002 .

[32]  J. Westerink,et al.  Rapid Assessment of Wave and Surge Risk during Landfalling Hurricanes: Probabilistic Approach , 2013 .

[33]  Robert W. Whalin,et al.  AN EFFICIENT STORM SURGE FORECASTING TOOL FOR COASTAL MISSISSIPPI , 2011 .

[34]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[35]  Edward N. Rappaport,et al.  THE DEADLIEST, COSTLIEST, AND MOST INTENSE UNITED STATES TROPICAL CYCLONES FROM 1851 TO 2004 (AND OTHER FREQUENTLY REQUESTED HURRICANE FACTS) , 2005 .

[36]  J. Irish,et al.  A surge response function approach to coastal hazard assessment. Part 2: Quantification of spatial attributes of response functions , 2009 .

[37]  Charles Vardeman,et al.  CyberEye: Development of integrated cyber-infrastructure to support rapid hurricane risk assessment , 2014 .

[38]  J. C. Dietrich,et al.  A High-Resolution Coupled Riverine Flow, Tide, Wind, Wind Wave, and Storm Surge Model for Southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part I: Model Development and Validation , 2010 .

[39]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  SWIMS HAWAII HURRICANE WAVE, SURGE, AND RUNUP INUNDATION FAST FORECASTING TOOL , 2011 .

[40]  D. Resio,et al.  Analysis of the coastal Mississippi storm surge hazard , 2010 .

[41]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Kriging Metamodeling in Simulation: A Review , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Scott C. Hagen,et al.  Development and uncertainty quantification of hurricane surge response functions for hazard assessment in coastal bays , 2015, Natural Hazards.