Describing Health Service Platform Architectures: A Guiding Framework

Health service platforms (HSPs) facilitate new ways of delivering health care, in order to improve care effectiveness and efficiency. HSPs are a sub-type of digital platforms that have a different purpose compared to market-oriented platforms for product innovation or economic transactions. Hence, traditional descriptions of digital platform architecture, such as the layered modular architecture, may not be sufficient to capture the essential features of HSPs. We create an initial framework for describing HSP architectures in a manner that reflects their purpose, drawing from literature on Service-Dominant Logic and architectural patterns. The framework will be used to guide a multiple-case study of HSP architecture. The results of this research will extend current conceptualizations of digital platform architectures and provide a systematic approach for designing or evolving HSP platform architectures in a manner that better meets patients’ and other health care stakeholders’ needs.

[1]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  A Service Science Perspective on the Role of ICT in Service Innovation , 2015, ECIS.

[2]  Ralph Johnson,et al.  design patterns elements of reusable object oriented software , 2019 .

[3]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution , 2008 .

[4]  Minhee Kang,et al.  Recent Patient Health Monitoring Platforms Incorporating Internet of Things-Enabled Smart Devices , 2018, International neurourology journal.

[5]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  Collective action for a common service platform for independent living services , 2013, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  Tina Blegind Jensen,et al.  Building National eHealth Platforms: the Challenge of Inclusiveness , 2017, ICIS.

[7]  Federica Paganelli,et al.  ERMHAN: A Context-Aware Service Platform to Support Continuous Care Networks for Home-Based Assistance , 2008, International journal of telemedicine and applications.

[8]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Data Collection for Mental Health Studies Through Digital Platforms: Requirements and Design of a Prototype , 2017, JMIR research protocols.

[9]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Platform Complexity: Lessons from Mobile Wireless , 2012, ICMB.

[10]  Ted Saarikko,et al.  Digital platform development: A service-oriented perspective , 2015, ECIS.

[11]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View , 2008 .

[12]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Managing technological change in the digital age: the role of architectural frames , 2014, J. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Bashar Nuseibeh,et al.  Weaving Together Requirements and Architectures , 2001, Computer.

[14]  Ryuta Kawashima,et al.  The My Active and Healthy Aging (My-AHA) ICT platform to detect and prevent frailty in older adults: Randomized control trial design and protocol , 2018, Alzheimer's & dementia.

[15]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research , 2002 .

[16]  A. Gawer Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework , 2014 .

[17]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Zolnowski Andreas,et al.  Conceptualizing Resource Orchestration - The Role of Service Platforms in Facilitating Service Systems , 2018, HICSS.

[19]  Matthias Herterich,et al.  Looking for a Few Good Concepts and Theories for Digitized Artifacts and Digital Innovation in a Material World , 2016, ICIS.

[20]  Bertalan Meskó,et al.  Digital health is a cultural transformation of traditional healthcare. , 2017, mHealth.

[21]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  Prototyping a Health and Wellbeing Platform: An Action Design Research Approach , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[22]  Robert F. Lusch,et al.  Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective , 2015, MIS Q..

[23]  Fredrik Svahn,et al.  Transforming Organizational Resource into Platform boundary Resources , 2016, ECIS.