Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining

[1]  S. Toulmin The uses of argument , 1960 .

[2]  J. Austin How to do things with words , 1962 .

[3]  N. Meyers,et al.  H = W. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  J. Fleiss Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. , 1971 .

[5]  E. Garfield Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.

[6]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils , 1975 .

[7]  S. Ervin-Tripp Is Sybil there? the structure of some American English directives , 1976, Language in Society.

[8]  S. Toulmin,et al.  An introduction to reasoning , 1979 .

[9]  M. Finocchiaro Galileo and the Art of Reasoning , 1980 .

[10]  Stephen N. Thomas,et al.  Practical Reasoning in Natural Language , 1981 .

[11]  T. Govier A practical study of argument , 1985 .

[12]  J. Swales,et al.  The Writing of Research Article Introductions , 1987 .

[13]  William C. Mann,et al.  Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization , 1988 .

[14]  Kevin D. Ashley Modeling legal argument - reasoning with cases and hypotheticals , 1991, Artificial intelligence and legal reasoning.

[15]  James B. Freeman,et al.  Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments , 1991 .

[16]  John L. Pollock,et al.  How to Reason Defeasibly , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[18]  Beatrice Santorini,et al.  Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank , 1993, CL.

[19]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[20]  Ellen Riloff,et al.  Automatically Acquiring Conceptual Patterns without an Annotated Corpus , 1995, VLC@ACL.

[21]  D. Walton Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning , 1995 .

[22]  I. Hutchby Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio , 1996 .

[23]  J. A. Blair,et al.  Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory : A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments , 1997 .

[24]  Chris Reed,et al.  Content Ordering in the Generation of Persuasive Discourse , 1997, IJCAI.

[25]  Martin Chodorow,et al.  Automated Scoring Using A Hybrid Feature Identification Technique , 1998, ACL.

[26]  Helmut Schmid,et al.  Improvements in Part-of-Speech Tagging with an Application to German , 1999 .

[27]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[28]  M. Leezenberg John R. Searle , 2000 .

[29]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[30]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[31]  Guido Bugmann,et al.  Training Personal Robots Using Natural Language Instruction , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[32]  Martin Chodorow,et al.  Enriching Automated Essay Scoring Using Discourse Marking , 2001 .

[33]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Back to the Future: Dimensions Revisited , 2001 .

[34]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines , 2002, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[35]  Ramakrishnan Srikant,et al.  Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior , 2003, WWW '03.

[36]  Jeffrey S. Lubbers A Guide to Federal Agency Rulemaking , 2003 .

[37]  Daniel Marcu,et al.  Finding the WRITE Stuff: Automatic Identification of Discourse Structure in Student Essays , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[38]  Klaus krippendorff,et al.  Measuring the Reliability of Qualitative Text Analysis Data , 2004 .

[39]  Rohit J. Kate,et al.  Comparative experiments on learning information extractors for proteins and their interactions , 2005, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[40]  Melissa D. Begg,et al.  Joseph L. Fleiss , 2005 .

[41]  Janyce Wiebe,et al.  Recognizing Contextual Polarity in Phrase-Level Sentiment Analysis , 2005, HLT.

[42]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Computational Representation of Practical Argument , 2006, Synthese.

[43]  B. Kanoksilapatham Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles , 2005 .

[44]  Ido Dagan,et al.  The Third PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge , 2007, ACL-PASCAL@ACL.

[45]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Generating Typed Dependency Parses from Phrase Structure Parses , 2006, LREC.

[46]  Wei-Hao Lin,et al.  Which Side are You on? Identifying Perspectives at the Document and Sentence Levels , 2006, CoNLL.

[47]  Nigel Collier,et al.  Zone analysis in biology articles as a basis for information extraction , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[48]  S. Erduran,et al.  Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview , 2007 .

[49]  Swapna Somasundaran,et al.  Detecting Arguing and Sentiment in Meetings , 2007, SIGdial.

[50]  Yuji Matsumoto,et al.  Extracting Aspect-Evaluation and Aspect-Of Relations in Opinion Mining , 2007, EMNLP.

[51]  Marie-Francine Moens,et al.  Automatic detection of arguments in legal texts , 2007, ICAIL.

[52]  Lillian Lee,et al.  Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis , 2008, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[53]  Tim van Gelder,et al.  The rationale for Rationale , 2007 .

[54]  Marie-Francine Moens,et al.  Language Resources for Studying Argument , 2008, LREC.

[55]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Three Senses of "Argument" , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[56]  Ron Artstein,et al.  Survey Article: Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics , 2008, CL.

[57]  Swapna Somasundaran,et al.  Discourse Level Opinion Relations: An Annotation Study , 2008, SIGDIAL Workshop.

[58]  C. Lee Giles,et al.  ParsCit: an Open-source CRF Reference String Parsing Package , 2008, LREC.

[59]  Elena Cotos,et al.  Automatic Identification of Discourse Moves in Scientific Article Introductions , 2008 .

[60]  Marie-Francine Moens,et al.  Study on the Structure of Argumentation in Case Law , 2008, JURIX.

[61]  Hong Yu,et al.  Automatically classifying sentences in full-text biomedical articles into Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion , 2009, Bioinform..

[62]  Paul Buitelaar,et al.  Identifying the Epistemic Value of Discourse Segments in Biology Texts (project abstract) , 2009, IWCS.

[63]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[64]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  Sequence models and ranking methods for discourse parsing , 2009 .

[65]  Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al.  HILDA: A Discourse Parser Using Support Vector Machine Classification , 2010, Dialogue Discourse.

[66]  Raymond H. Putra,et al.  Support or Oppose? Classifying Positions in Online Debates from Reply Activities and Opinion Expressions , 2010, COLING.

[67]  Niels Pinkwart,et al.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning DOI 10.1007/s11412-009-9080-x Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art , 2009 .

[68]  S. Grillner,et al.  Impacting our young , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  Chris Callison-Burch,et al.  Cheap Facts and Counter-Facts , 2010, Mturk@HLT-NAACL.

[70]  Austin J. Freeley Argumentation and debate , 2010 .

[71]  Marie-Francine Moens,et al.  Argumentation mining , 2011, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[72]  Hwee Tou Ng,et al.  Automatically Evaluating Text Coherence Using Discourse Relations , 2011, ACL.

[73]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Classifying arguments by scheme , 2011, ACL.

[74]  Parmit K. Chilana,et al.  Design, discussion, and dissent in open bug reports , 2011, iConference '11.

[75]  Marilyn A. Walker,et al.  Cats Rule and Dogs Drool!: Classifying Stance in Online Debate , 2011, WASSA@ACL.

[76]  Nitin Madnani,et al.  Identifying High-Level Organizational Elements in Argumentative Discourse , 2012, NAACL.

[77]  Ellen Riloff,et al.  Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies , 2012, HLT-NAACL 2012.

[78]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Text-level Discourse Parsing with Rich Linguistic Features , 2012, ACL.

[79]  Matt Post,et al.  Constructing Parallel Corpora for Six Indian Languages via Crowdsourcing , 2012, WMT@NAACL-HLT.

[80]  Ana Gabriela Maguitman,et al.  An Argument-based Approach to Mining Opinions from Twitter , 2012, AT.

[81]  Patrick Saint-Dizier,et al.  Some Facets of Argument Mining for Opinion Analysis , 2012, COMMA.

[82]  Paul Thomas,et al.  Unifying Local and Global Agreement and Disagreement Classification in Online Debates , 2012, WASSA@ACL.

[83]  Dragomir R. Radev,et al.  Reference Scope Identification in Citing Sentences , 2012, NAACL.

[84]  Serena Villata,et al.  A natural language bipolar argumentation approach to support users in online debate interactions† , 2013, Argument Comput..

[85]  Maite Taboada,et al.  On the contribution of discourse structure to topic segmentation , 2013, SIGDIAL Conference.

[86]  Arjun Mukherjee,et al.  Discovering User Interactions in Ideological Discussions , 2013, ACL.

[87]  Floris Bex,et al.  Implementing the argument web , 2013, Commun. ACM.

[88]  Kevin D. Ashley,et al.  Using Argument Diagramming to Improve Peer Grading of Writing Assignments , 2013, AIED Workshops.

[89]  Yi Song,et al.  Teaching critical questions about argumentation through the revising process: effects of strategy instruction on college students’ argumentative essays , 2013 .

[90]  Nitin Madnani,et al.  The E-rater® Automated Essay Scoring System , 2013 .