Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining
暂无分享,去创建一个
Chris Reed | John Lawrence | Colin Allen | Simon McAlister | David Bourget | C. Allen | C. Reed | D. Bourget | John Lawrence | S. McAlister
[1] S. Toulmin. The uses of argument , 1960 .
[2] J. Austin. How to do things with words , 1962 .
[3] N. Meyers,et al. H = W. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[4] J. Fleiss. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. , 1971 .
[5] E. Garfield. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. , 1972, Science.
[6] J. Sinclair,et al. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils , 1975 .
[7] S. Ervin-Tripp. Is Sybil there? the structure of some American English directives , 1976, Language in Society.
[8] S. Toulmin,et al. An introduction to reasoning , 1979 .
[9] M. Finocchiaro. Galileo and the Art of Reasoning , 1980 .
[10] Stephen N. Thomas,et al. Practical Reasoning in Natural Language , 1981 .
[11] T. Govier. A practical study of argument , 1985 .
[12] J. Swales,et al. The Writing of Research Article Introductions , 1987 .
[13] William C. Mann,et al. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization , 1988 .
[14] Kevin D. Ashley. Modeling legal argument - reasoning with cases and hypotheticals , 1991, Artificial intelligence and legal reasoning.
[15] James B. Freeman,et al. Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments , 1991 .
[16] John L. Pollock,et al. How to Reason Defeasibly , 1992, Artif. Intell..
[17] Robert Tibshirani,et al. An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .
[18] Beatrice Santorini,et al. Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank , 1993, CL.
[19] Phan Minh Dung,et al. On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..
[20] Ellen Riloff,et al. Automatically Acquiring Conceptual Patterns without an Annotated Corpus , 1995, VLC@ACL.
[21] D. Walton. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning , 1995 .
[22] I. Hutchby. Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio , 1996 .
[23] J. A. Blair,et al. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory : A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments , 1997 .
[24] Chris Reed,et al. Content Ordering in the Generation of Persuasive Discourse , 1997, IJCAI.
[25] Martin Chodorow,et al. Automated Scoring Using A Hybrid Feature Identification Technique , 1998, ACL.
[26] Helmut Schmid,et al. Improvements in Part-of-Speech Tagging with an Application to German , 1999 .
[27] Ian H. Witten,et al. Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .
[28] M. Leezenberg. John R. Searle , 2000 .
[29] Christiane Fellbaum,et al. Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.
[30] Trevor Hastie,et al. The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .
[31] Guido Bugmann,et al. Training Personal Robots Using Natural Language Instruction , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..
[32] Martin Chodorow,et al. Enriching Automated Essay Scoring Using Discourse Marking , 2001 .
[33] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al. Back to the Future: Dimensions Revisited , 2001 .
[34] Chih-Jen Lin,et al. A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines , 2002, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.
[35] Ramakrishnan Srikant,et al. Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior , 2003, WWW '03.
[36] Jeffrey S. Lubbers. A Guide to Federal Agency Rulemaking , 2003 .
[37] Daniel Marcu,et al. Finding the WRITE Stuff: Automatic Identification of Discourse Structure in Student Essays , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..
[38] Klaus krippendorff,et al. Measuring the Reliability of Qualitative Text Analysis Data , 2004 .
[39] Rohit J. Kate,et al. Comparative experiments on learning information extractors for proteins and their interactions , 2005, Artif. Intell. Medicine.
[40] Melissa D. Begg,et al. Joseph L. Fleiss , 2005 .
[41] Janyce Wiebe,et al. Recognizing Contextual Polarity in Phrase-Level Sentiment Analysis , 2005, HLT.
[42] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al. Computational Representation of Practical Argument , 2006, Synthese.
[43] B. Kanoksilapatham. Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles , 2005 .
[44] Ido Dagan,et al. The Third PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge , 2007, ACL-PASCAL@ACL.
[45] Christopher D. Manning,et al. Generating Typed Dependency Parses from Phrase Structure Parses , 2006, LREC.
[46] Wei-Hao Lin,et al. Which Side are You on? Identifying Perspectives at the Document and Sentence Levels , 2006, CoNLL.
[47] Nigel Collier,et al. Zone analysis in biology articles as a basis for information extraction , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.
[48] S. Erduran,et al. Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview , 2007 .
[49] Swapna Somasundaran,et al. Detecting Arguing and Sentiment in Meetings , 2007, SIGdial.
[50] Yuji Matsumoto,et al. Extracting Aspect-Evaluation and Aspect-Of Relations in Opinion Mining , 2007, EMNLP.
[51] Marie-Francine Moens,et al. Automatic detection of arguments in legal texts , 2007, ICAIL.
[52] Lillian Lee,et al. Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis , 2008, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..
[53] Tim van Gelder,et al. The rationale for Rationale , 2007 .
[54] Marie-Francine Moens,et al. Language Resources for Studying Argument , 2008, LREC.
[55] Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al. Three Senses of "Argument" , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.
[56] Ron Artstein,et al. Survey Article: Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics , 2008, CL.
[57] Swapna Somasundaran,et al. Discourse Level Opinion Relations: An Annotation Study , 2008, SIGDIAL Workshop.
[58] C. Lee Giles,et al. ParsCit: an Open-source CRF Reference String Parsing Package , 2008, LREC.
[59] Elena Cotos,et al. Automatic Identification of Discourse Moves in Scientific Article Introductions , 2008 .
[60] Marie-Francine Moens,et al. Study on the Structure of Argumentation in Case Law , 2008, JURIX.
[61] Hong Yu,et al. Automatically classifying sentences in full-text biomedical articles into Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion , 2009, Bioinform..
[62] Paul Buitelaar,et al. Identifying the Epistemic Value of Discourse Segments in Biology Texts (project abstract) , 2009, IWCS.
[63] Ian H. Witten,et al. The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.
[64] James Pustejovsky,et al. Sequence models and ranking methods for discourse parsing , 2009 .
[65] Mitsuru Ishizuka,et al. HILDA: A Discourse Parser Using Support Vector Machine Classification , 2010, Dialogue Discourse.
[66] Raymond H. Putra,et al. Support or Oppose? Classifying Positions in Online Debates from Reply Activities and Opinion Expressions , 2010, COLING.
[67] Niels Pinkwart,et al. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning DOI 10.1007/s11412-009-9080-x Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art , 2009 .
[68] S. Grillner,et al. Impacting our young , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[69] Chris Callison-Burch,et al. Cheap Facts and Counter-Facts , 2010, Mturk@HLT-NAACL.
[70] Austin J. Freeley. Argumentation and debate , 2010 .
[71] Marie-Francine Moens,et al. Argumentation mining , 2011, Artificial Intelligence and Law.
[72] Hwee Tou Ng,et al. Automatically Evaluating Text Coherence Using Discourse Relations , 2011, ACL.
[73] Graeme Hirst,et al. Classifying arguments by scheme , 2011, ACL.
[74] Parmit K. Chilana,et al. Design, discussion, and dissent in open bug reports , 2011, iConference '11.
[75] Marilyn A. Walker,et al. Cats Rule and Dogs Drool!: Classifying Stance in Online Debate , 2011, WASSA@ACL.
[76] Nitin Madnani,et al. Identifying High-Level Organizational Elements in Argumentative Discourse , 2012, NAACL.
[77] Ellen Riloff,et al. Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies , 2012, HLT-NAACL 2012.
[78] Graeme Hirst,et al. Text-level Discourse Parsing with Rich Linguistic Features , 2012, ACL.
[79] Matt Post,et al. Constructing Parallel Corpora for Six Indian Languages via Crowdsourcing , 2012, WMT@NAACL-HLT.
[80] Ana Gabriela Maguitman,et al. An Argument-based Approach to Mining Opinions from Twitter , 2012, AT.
[81] Patrick Saint-Dizier,et al. Some Facets of Argument Mining for Opinion Analysis , 2012, COMMA.
[82] Paul Thomas,et al. Unifying Local and Global Agreement and Disagreement Classification in Online Debates , 2012, WASSA@ACL.
[83] Dragomir R. Radev,et al. Reference Scope Identification in Citing Sentences , 2012, NAACL.
[84] Serena Villata,et al. A natural language bipolar argumentation approach to support users in online debate interactions† , 2013, Argument Comput..
[85] Maite Taboada,et al. On the contribution of discourse structure to topic segmentation , 2013, SIGDIAL Conference.
[86] Arjun Mukherjee,et al. Discovering User Interactions in Ideological Discussions , 2013, ACL.
[87] Floris Bex,et al. Implementing the argument web , 2013, Commun. ACM.
[88] Kevin D. Ashley,et al. Using Argument Diagramming to Improve Peer Grading of Writing Assignments , 2013, AIED Workshops.
[89] Yi Song,et al. Teaching critical questions about argumentation through the revising process: effects of strategy instruction on college students’ argumentative essays , 2013 .
[90] Nitin Madnani,et al. The E-rater® Automated Essay Scoring System , 2013 .