Discriminating qubit states with entangling collective measurements

It is a central fact in quantum mechanics that non-orthogonal states cannot be distinguished perfectly. This property ensures the security of quantum key distribution. It is therefore an important task in quantum communication to design and implement strategies to optimally distinguish quantum states. In general, when distinguishing multiple copies of quantum states the optimal measurement will be an entangling collective measurement. However, to date, collective measurements have not been used to enhance quantum state discrimination. One of the main reasons for this is the fact that, in the usual state discrimination setting, at least three copies of a quantum state are required to be measured collectively to outperform separable measurements. This is very challenging experimentally. In this work, we propose and experimentally demonstrate a protocol for distinguishing two copies of single qubit states using collective measurements which achieves a lower probability of error than can be achieved by any non-entangling measurement. We implement our measurements on an IBM Q System One device, a superconducting quantum processor. This work represents an important step towards optimising quantum communication systems.

[1]  P. Lam,et al.  The gap persistence theorem for quantum multiparameter estimation , 2022, 2208.07386.

[2]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Experimental Test of Contextuality Based on State Discrimination with a Single Qubit , 2022, Chinese Physics Letters.

[3]  T. Monz,et al.  Approaching optimal entangling collective measurements on quantum computing platforms , 2022, Nature Physics.

[4]  G. Lima,et al.  Experimental quantum state discrimination using the optimal fixed rate of inconclusive outcomes strategy , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[5]  L. Maccone,et al.  Testing quantum foundations with quantum computers , 2022, Physical Review Research.

[6]  Michael R. Grace,et al.  Demonstration of quantum-limited discrimination of multicopy pure versus mixed states , 2021, Physical Review A.

[7]  C. Lupo,et al.  Quantum Hypothesis Testing for Exoplanet Detection. , 2021, Physical review letters.

[8]  Jasminder S. Sidhu,et al.  Quantum Receiver for Phase-Shift Keying at the Single-Photon Level , 2021, PRX Quantum.

[9]  G. Guo,et al.  Minimizing Backaction through Entangled Measurements. , 2020, Physical review letters.

[10]  U. Andersen,et al.  Adaptive Generalized Measurement for Unambiguous State Discrimination of Quaternary Phase-Shift-Keying Coherent States , 2020, PRX Quantum.

[11]  Stefano Pirandola,et al.  Quantum illumination with a generic Gaussian source , 2020, Physical Review Research.

[12]  U. Andersen,et al.  Experimental Demonstration of a Quantum Receiver Beating the Standard Quantum Limit at Telecom Wavelength , 2020, Physical Review Applied.

[13]  G. Guo,et al.  Direct estimation of quantum coherence by collective measurements , 2020, npj Quantum Information.

[14]  Simone Severini,et al.  Quantum state discrimination using noisy quantum neural networks , 2019, Physical Review Research.

[15]  S. Barnett,et al.  Multiple-copy state discrimination of noisy qubits , 2019, Physical Review A.

[16]  G. Guo,et al.  Experimentally reducing the quantum measurement back action in work distributions by a collective measurement , 2019, Science Advances.

[17]  Claudio Carmeli,et al.  Quantum Incompatibility Witnesses. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[18]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Advances in photonic quantum sensing , 2018, Nature Photonics.

[19]  Konrad Banaszek,et al.  Beating the Rayleigh Limit Using Two-Photon Interference. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[20]  Guang-Can Guo,et al.  Deterministic realization of collective measurements via photonic quantum walks , 2017, Nature Communications.

[21]  R. Spekkens,et al.  Contextual Advantage for State Discrimination , 2017, 1706.04588.

[22]  Marco G. Genoni,et al.  Entangling measurements for multiparameter estimation with two qubits , 2017, 1704.03327.

[23]  Jeffrey H. Shapiro,et al.  Optimum mixed-state discrimination for noisy entanglement-enhanced sensing , 2016, 2017 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[24]  Howard Mark Wiseman,et al.  Quantum State Discrimination Using the Minimum Average Number of Copies. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[25]  Joonwoo Bae,et al.  Quantum state discrimination and its applications , 2015, 1707.02571.

[26]  J Fan,et al.  Implementation of generalized quantum measurements for unambiguous discrimination of multiple non-orthogonal coherent states , 2013, Nature Communications.

[27]  Julius Goldhar,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a receiver beating the standard quantum limit for multiple nonorthogonal state discrimination , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[28]  Adetunmise C. Dada,et al.  Distinguishing between nonorthogonal quantum states of a single nuclear spin. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[29]  Matthew F Pusey,et al.  On the reality of the quantum state , 2011, Nature Physics.

[30]  A. C. Doherty,et al.  Multiple-copy state discrimination: Thinking globally, acting locally , 2010, 1012.3525.

[31]  E Bagan,et al.  Local discrimination of mixed States. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[32]  János A. Bergou,et al.  Discrimination of quantum states , 2004 .

[33]  B L Higgins,et al.  Mixed state discrimination using optimal control. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[34]  S. Barnett,et al.  Quantum state discrimination , 2008, 0810.1970.

[35]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Quantum illumination with Gaussian states. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[36]  Masahide Sasaki,et al.  Demonstration of near-optimal discrimination of optical coherent states. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[37]  S. Lloyd.  Enhanced Sensitivity of Photodetection via Quantum Illumination , 2008, Science.

[38]  M. Dušek,et al.  Programmable discriminator of coherent states: Experimental realization , 2007, 0711.4712.

[39]  E. Bagan,et al.  Quantum Chernoff bound as a measure of distinguishability between density matrices: Application to qubit and Gaussian states , 2007, 0708.2343.

[40]  Robert L. Cook,et al.  Optical coherent state discrimination using a closed-loop quantum measurement , 2007, Nature.

[41]  E. Bagan,et al.  Multiple-copy two-state discrimination with individual measurements , 2004, quant-ph/0410097.

[42]  Colin P. Williams,et al.  Optimal Quantum Circuits for General Two-Qubit Gates , 2003, quant-ph/0308006.

[43]  S. Barnett,et al.  Minimum-error discrimination between three mirror-symmetric states , 2002, quant-ph/0201074.

[44]  A. J. Short,et al.  Local distinguishability of multipartite orthogonal quantum states , 2000, Physical review letters.

[45]  Brody,et al.  Minimum decision cost for quantum ensembles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[46]  Massar,et al.  Optimal extraction of information from finite quantum ensembles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[47]  W. Wootters,et al.  Optimal detection of quantum information. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[48]  D. Dieks.  Overlap and distinguishability of quantum states , 1988 .

[49]  W. Wootters,et al.  A single quantum cannot be cloned , 1982, Nature.

[50]  H. Yuen.  Quantum detection and estimation theory , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[51]  A. J. Short,et al.  Ju l 2 00 0 Local Distinguishability of Multipartite Orthogonal Quantum States , 2008 .

[52]  Masashi Ban,et al.  Accessible information in combined and sequential quantum measurementson a binary-state signal , 1997 .