Advantages of externally powered prosthesis with feedback system using pseudo-cineplasty.

Externally powered upper-limb prostheses are difficult to use because of the lack of sensory feedback. Neuroprostheses have recently been developed for people with upper-limb amputation but are complicated, expensive, and still developing. We therefore designed a simple system by combining pseudo-cineplasty with extended physiological proprioception to provide sensory feedback to the body. We penetrated the palmaris longus tendon percutaneously with a metal ring, similar to that used in body piercing, in a nondisabled subject as a pseudo-cineplasty. The tendon and ring were connected to the system, and a sensory feedback experiment was performed. We investigated the ability of the user to determine the size of an object grasped by the prosthetic hand without visual information. The subject could distinguish between large and small objects with 100% accuracy and between small, medium, and large objects with 80% accuracy. In pseudo-cineplasty, control and sensory feedback are natural because the prosthetic hand is controlled by muscle contraction. Tension transmitted from the prosthetic hand is sensed via muscle spindles and skin sensors. This technique allows only partial sensory feedback but appears to offer several advantages over other human-machine interfaces.

[1]  Andrew S. Whitford,et al.  Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding , 2008, Nature.

[2]  Kenzo Akazawa,et al.  Basic study of vibrotactile sensory feedback system for biomimetic powered-prosthetic hand , 1996 .

[3]  R. Mazet Cineplasty; historical review, present status, and critical evaluation of sixty-four patients. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  D. Childress,et al.  An analysis of extended physiological proprioception as a prosthesis-control technique. , 1984, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Referral of sensation to an advanced humanoid robotic hand prosthesis , 2009, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[6]  Christian Balkenius,et al.  Design and technical construction of a tactile display for sensory feedback in a hand prosthesis system , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.

[7]  E A BRAV,et al.  Cineplasty; an end-result study. , 1957, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  Dudley S Childress,et al.  The effects of static friction and backlash on extended physiological proprioception control of a powered prosthesis. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  G. Schalk,et al.  The emerging world of motor neuroprosthetics: a neurosurgical perspective. , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[10]  D S Childress,et al.  Cineplasty as a control input for externally powered prosthetic components. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  I. Dudkiewicz,et al.  Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[12]  Pedram Afshar,et al.  On the design of robotic hands for brain-machine interface. , 2006, Neurosurgical focus.

[13]  A W SPITTLER,et al.  Cineplastic muscle motors for prostheses of arm amputees. , 1951, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  Lutz Briickner Sauerbruch-lebsche-vanghetti cineplasty: The surgical procedure , 1992 .

[15]  R. J. Vogelstein,et al.  Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Decoding a new neural machine interface for control of artificial limbs. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  P. Herberts The Control of upper-extremity prostheses and orthoses , 1974 .

[18]  J. Ashe,et al.  Offline Decoding of End-Point Forces Using Neural Ensembles: Application to a Brain–Machine Interface , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Yada Keita,et al.  A study of sensory feedback system for two kinds of information transmission of EMG prosthetic hand , 2004 .

[20]  P H Chappell,et al.  A clinical experience with a hierarchically controlled myoelectric hand prosthesis with vibro-tactile feedback , 1993, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[21]  Childress Ds,et al.  Design and evaluation of a prosthesis control system based on the concept of extended physiological proprioception. , 1984 .

[22]  D. Childress,et al.  Design and evaluation of a prosthesis control system based on the concept of extended physiological proprioception. , 1984, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[23]  A. Kargov,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Low-Cost Force Feedback System for Myoelectric Prosthetic Hands , 2006 .

[24]  Doubler Ja,et al.  An analysis of extended physiological proprioception as a prosthesis-control technique. , 1984 .

[25]  Nicholas G Hatsopoulos,et al.  The science of neural interface systems. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.