How long can you hold the filler: maintenance and retrieval

ABSTRACT This study attempts to reveal the mechanisms behind the online formation of Wh-Filler-Gap Dependencies (WhFGD). Specifically, we aim to uncover the way in which maintenance and retrieval work in WhFGD processing, by paying special attention to the information that is retrieved when the gap is recognized. We use the agreement attraction phenomenon (Wagers, M. W., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2009). Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), 206–237) as a probe. The first and second experiments examined the type of information that is maintained and how maintenance is motivated, investigating the retrieved information at the gap for reactivated fillers and definite NPs. The third experiment examined the role of the retrieval, comparing reactivated and active fillers. We contend that the information being accessed reflects the extent to which the filler is maintained, where the reader is able to access fine-grained information including category information as well as a representation of both the head and the modifier at the verb.

[1]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Plausibility and grammatical agreement , 2003 .

[2]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[3]  T. Bever,et al.  Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension , 1988 .

[4]  Colin Phillips,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Going the Distance: Memory and Control Processes in Active Dependency Construction , 2022 .

[5]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Argument-Head Distance and Processing Complexity: Explaining both Locality and Antilocality Effects , 2006 .

[6]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Agreement Processes in Sentence Comprehension , 1999 .

[7]  Janet G. van Hell,et al.  Dissociating retrieval interference and reanalysis in the P600 during sentence comprehension. , 2017, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Colin Phillips,et al.  5: Grammatical Illusions and Selective Fallibility in Real-Time Language Comprehension , 2011 .

[9]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Natural language parsing: How can grammars help parsers? , 1985 .

[10]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  Using cross-modal lexical decision tasks to investigate sentence processing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Laurel Brehm,et al.  The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction. , 2014, Journal of memory and language.

[12]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Interference-Based Forgetting in Verbal Short-Term Memory. , 2008 .

[13]  Tessa C. Warren,et al.  The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity , 2002, Cognition.

[14]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing Recent Events , 2006 .

[15]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Multiple dependencies and the role of the grammar in real-time comprehension1 , 2009, Journal of Linguistics.

[17]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  On Wh-Movement , 1977 .

[18]  B. McElree,et al.  Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[19]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[20]  C. Clifton,et al.  Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Wing-Yee Chow,et al.  Eye-tracking evidence for active gap-filling regardless of dependency length , 2018, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  Tessa C. Warren,et al.  READING-TIME EVIDENCE FOR INTERMEDIATE LINGUISTIC STRUCTURE IN LONG-DISTANCE DEPENDENCIES , 2004 .

[23]  M. Pickering,et al.  Plausibility and the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies:An Eye-Tracking Study , 1996 .

[24]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic integration costs during parsing: the processing of German WH-questions , 2002 .

[25]  Masaya Yoshida,et al.  The online processing of noun phrase ellipsis and mechanisms of antecedent retrieval , 2018, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience.

[26]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[27]  T. Bever,et al.  The psychological reality of linguistically defined gaps , 1989 .

[28]  Arthur Stepanov,et al.  Cross-linguistic evidence for memory storage costs in filler-gap dependencies with wh-adjuncts , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[29]  D Swinney,et al.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[30]  A. Weinberg,et al.  Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language , 2004 .

[31]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Exploratory and Confirmatory Analyses in Sentence Processing: A Case Study of Number Interference in German. , 2018, Cognitive science.

[32]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[33]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Consequences of the Serial Nature of Linguistic Input for Sentenial Complexity , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  K. Forster,et al.  Subject-verb agreement processes in comprehension , 1997 .

[35]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  In search of decay in verbal short-term memory. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Verb Argument Structure in Parsing and Interpretation: Evidence from wh-Questions , 1995 .

[37]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  The Preservation of Structure in Language Comprehension: Is Reanalysis the Last Resort? , 2001 .

[38]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Grammatical Search and Reanalysis , 2001 .

[39]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Distinguishing theories of syntactic expectation cost in sentence comprehension: evidence from Japanese , 2008 .

[40]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser , 1989 .

[41]  Ming-Wei Lee,et al.  Another Look at the Role of Empty Categories in Sentence Processing (and Grammar) , 2004, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[42]  C. Phillips.  The Real-Time Status of Island Phenomena , 2007 .

[43]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Online Syntactic Storage Costs in Sentence Comprehension. , 2005 .

[44]  Laurie A. Stowe,et al.  Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location , 1986 .

[45]  E. Gibson.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[46]  L. Frazier,et al.  Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in dutch , 1989 .

[47]  Douglas Rohde,et al.  Linger - a flexible platform for language processing experiments , 2003 .

[48]  Brian Dillon,et al.  Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence , 2013 .

[49]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[50]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Working memory differences in long-distance dependency resolution , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[51]  H E Wanner,et al.  An ATN approach to comprehension , 1978 .

[52]  J. S. Nairne.  Remembering over the short-term: the case against the standard model. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[53]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Agreement Attraction in Comprehension: Representations and Processes. , 2009 .

[54]  山田 雄一郎,et al.  On Psychological Reality , 1984 .

[55]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  The interplay of syntax and form in sentence production: A cross-linguistic study of form effects on agreement , 2008 .

[56]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[57]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Hyper-active gap filling , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[58]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[59]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  A formal model of capacity limits in working memory , 2006 .

[60]  J. Woolley,et al.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Lexical structure in parsing long-distance dependencies , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[62]  J. V. Van Dyke.  Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  When High-Capacity Readers Slow Down and Low-Capacity Readers Speed Up: Working Memory and Locality Effects , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[64]  S. Vasishth,et al.  Processing Chinese Relative Clauses: Evidence for the Subject-Relative Advantage , 2013, PloS one.

[65]  Stefan Keine,et al.  Locality Domains in Syntax: Evidence from Sentence Processing , 2020, Syntax.

[66]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .

[67]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[68]  B McElree,et al.  Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[69]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Sentence processing without empty categories , 1991 .

[70]  C. Phillips,et al.  Reflexive attraction in comprehension is selective , 2017 .

[71]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension: Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis , 2017 .

[72]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Agreement attraction in Spanish comprehension , 2015 .

[73]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar , 1985 .