Vanishing industries and the rising monopoly of universities in published research

Anecdotes abound regarding the decline of basic research in industrial and governmental settings, but very little empirical evidence exists about the phenomenon. This article provides a systematic and historical analysis of the contribution of various institutional sectors to knowledge production at the world and country levels across the past four decades. It highlights a dramatic decline in the diffusion of basic research by industrial and governmental sectors across all countries—with a corresponding increase in the share from universities—as well as an increase of partnerships between universities and other sectors. Results also shows an increase in the relative share of industries in applied research, as measured through patents. Such divergence in university and industry research activities may hinder industries’ ability to translate basic knowledge into technological innovation, and could lead to a growing misalignment between doctoral training and future job expectations. Industries and universities must rethink strategies for partnerships and publishing to maximize scientific progress and to ensure the greatest gains for society.

[1]  S. Shapin.  The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation , 2008 .

[2]  Ruben Vicente-Saez,et al.  Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition , 2018, Journal of Business Research.

[3]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics , 2003, Scientometrics.

[4]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Industry funding and university professors' research performance , 2005 .

[5]  C. Haeussler.  Information-Sharing in Academia and the Industry: A Comparative Study , 2010 .

[6]  Markus Simeth,et al.  What Makes Companies Pursue an Open Science Strategy? , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  Michael M. Hopkins,et al.  Big Pharma, little science? A bibliometric perspective on big pharma's R&D decline , 2013, ArXiv.

[8]  Adriana Johanna te Kaat,et al.  Careers of doctorate holders survey 2010 , 2014 .

[9]  Y. Gingras,et al.  The place of universities in the system of knowledge production , 2000 .

[10]  D. Hicks.  Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge , 1995 .

[11]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[12]  James A. Evans.  Industry Induces Academic Science to Know Less about More1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  M. Bogers,et al.  Explicating Open Innovation: Clarifying an Emerging Paradigm for Understanding Innovation , 2014 .

[14]  Michael Roach,et al.  Not All Scientists Pay to Be Scientists: PhDs’ Preferences for Publishing in Industrial Employment , 2013 .

[15]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[16]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[17]  H. Hoag.  Canadian research shift makes waves , 2011, Nature.

[18]  J. West,et al.  New frontiers in open innovation , 2014 .

[19]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980 , 2001 .

[20]  E. Hippel,et al.  Free revealing and the private-collective model for innovation incentives , 2006 .

[21]  Markus Simeth,et al.  How do firms develop capabilities for scientific disclosure , 2015 .

[22]  Diana Hicks,et al.  Where Is Science Going? , 1996 .

[23]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[24]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Cui Bono? The Selective Revealing of Knowledge and Its Implications for Innovative Activity , 2012 .

[25]  N. Rosenberg.  Why do firms do basic research (with their own money) , 1990 .

[26]  E. Berman,et al.  Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine , 2011 .

[27]  W. Frankenhuis,et al.  Open Science Is Liberating and Can Foster Creativity , 2018, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[28]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[29]  H. Derycke,et al.  Careers of doctorate holders , 2012 .

[30]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A Triple Helix of University—Industry—Government Relations , 1998, Scientometrics.

[31]  E. Geisler,et al.  When whales are cast ashore: the conversion to relevancy of American universities and basic science , 1995 .