The utility of upper urinary tract urine cytology before and after application of the Paris system
暂无分享,去创建一个
A. Chinnaiyan | R. Mehra | S. Kaffenberger | D. Spratt | A. Weizer | J. Montgomery | M. Lew | S. Skala | Martin J Magers | M. Magers | C. Simon | Madelyn Lew
[1] C. VandenBussche,et al. The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: early review of the literature reveals successes and rare shortcomings. , 2018, Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology.
[2] J. Heymann,et al. Improved correlation of urinary cytology specimens using The Paris System in biopsy‐proven upper tract urothelial carcinomas , 2018, Cancer cytopathology.
[3] C. Basset,et al. One year of experience using the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology , 2018, Cancer Cytopathology.
[4] F. Brimo,et al. Implementing The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology results in a decrease in the rate of the “atypical” category and an increase in its prediction of subsequent high‐grade urothelial carcinoma , 2018, Cancer cytopathology.
[5] M. Siddiqui,et al. The Paris system for reporting urinary cytology improves correlation with surgical pathology biopsy diagnoses of the lower urinary tract , 2018, Diagnostic cytopathology.
[6] D. Chhieng,et al. The Paris System for urine cytology in upper tract urothelial specimens: A comparative analysis with biopsy and surgical resection , 2018, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.
[7] A. Jemal,et al. Cancer statistics, 2018 , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[8] C. Sung,et al. Modification of The Paris System for urinary tract washing specimens using diagnostic cytological features , 2017, Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology.
[9] C. VandenBussche,et al. Improved risk stratification for patients with high‐grade urothelial carcinoma following application of the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology , 2017, Cancer cytopathology.
[10] C. VandenBussche,et al. Upper urinary tract washings outperform voided urine specimens to detect upper tract high‐grade urothelial carcinoma , 2017, Diagnostic cytopathology.
[11] R. Granados,et al. Applying the Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology Increases the Rate of Atypical Urothelial Cells in Benign Cases: A Need for Patient Management Recommendations , 2016, Acta Cytologica.
[12] F. Brimo,et al. Impact of Implementing the Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology in the Performance of Urine Cytology: A Correlative Study of 124 Cases. , 2016, American Journal of Clinical Pathology.
[13] B. Schwartz,et al. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Paradigm shift towards nephron sparing management. , 2016, World Journal of Nephrology.
[14] C. VandenBussche,et al. A review of reporting systems and terminology for urine cytology , 2013, Cancer cytopathology.
[15] Ghadeer A. Mokhtar,et al. Diagnostic significance of atypical category in the voided urine samples: A retrospective study in a tertiary care center , 2010, Urology annals.
[16] F. Brimo,et al. Accuracy of urine cytology and the significance of an atypical category. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.
[17] Y. Lotan,et al. Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: A series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration , 2009, Cancer.
[18] L. Kiemeney,et al. The present and future burden of urinary bladder cancer in the world , 2009, World Journal of Urology.
[19] D. Bagley,et al. Flexible ureteropyeloscopy: diagnosis and treatment in the upper urinary tract. , 1987, The Journal of urology.
[20] L. Koss,et al. Diagnostic value of cytology of voided urine. , 1985, Acta Cytologica.