Development of Review Criteria to Evaluate Health Behavior Change Websites

A growing number of major health care organizations, such as the American Heart Association and the Mayo Clinic, are investing considerable resources in developing and marketing Internet-based programs for health promotion and disease management. These programs have the potential to provide some of the best-tailored interventions in behavior change science at relatively low costs. This report discusses review criteria developed in order to conduct a systematic evaluation of Internet programs for preventive behaviors (alcohol, diet, exercise and smoking) and disease management (pediatric asthma, depression and diabetes.) These criteria can be used to develop and evaluate the quality of health promotion programs on the Internet.

[1]  M. Goolsby,et al.  Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence , 2008, Pediatrics.

[2]  P. Huynh,et al.  Evaluation of the quality of self-education mammography material available for patients on the Internet. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[3]  HON code of conduct for medical and health Web sites. , 2000, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[4]  M. Winker,et al.  Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: principles governing AMA web sites. American Medical Association. , 2000, JAMA.

[5]  William R. Hersh,et al.  Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web , 1999, AMIA.

[6]  S L Lusk,et al.  Healthy People 2010 , 2001, AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.

[7]  A R Jadad,et al.  Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? , 1998, JAMA.

[8]  R. Sorelle US Department of Health and Human Services gives states wider latitude in choosing services to be covered by Medicaid. , 2001, Circulation.

[9]  J C Wyatt,et al.  Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the world wide web , 1997, BMJ.

[10]  R. Kravitz,et al.  Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. , 2001, JAMA.

[11]  Patricia Dolan Mullen,et al.  Treating tobacco use and dependence: clinical practice guideline , 2000 .

[12]  Robert Mittman,et al.  Health e-People: The Online Consumer Experience , 2000 .

[13]  Stella M. Yu Healthy People 2010 , 1998, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[14]  P. W. Bowman,et al.  PHS Public Health Service , 1963 .

[15]  K Adelhard,et al.  Evaluation of Medical Internet Sites , 1999, Methods of Information in Medicine.