Non-peer reviewed preprint submitted to EarthArXiv

16 The most popular model for submarine unconfined lobate deposits has the following 17 attributes: (1) a single feeder channel that delivers sediment, (2) a set of distributary channels 18 present only in the proximal part of the lobate body, and (3) unchannelized tabular deposits 19 present in the middle and distal part of the lobate deposit. This model has become a standard to 20 guide interpretation of outcrop and subsurface examples of submarine lobate deposits. In this 21 contribution, three well imaged subsurface lobate deposits are described that display three 22 markedly different morphologies, all of which differ from the “standard” model. All three lobate 23 examples are buried by less than 150m of muddy sediment and imaged with high resolution 3D 24 reflection seismic data of similar quality and resolution. Distinctively different distributary 25 channel patterns are present in two of the examples, and no distributaries are imaged in a third 26 example. We conclude that if channels are not imaged, it is because channels are not present. 27 The different distributary channel patterns are interpreted to have resulted from different 28 processes: (1) a lobate deposit that is pervasively channelized by many distributaries that have 29 avulsed from numerous nodes is interpreted to result from mud-rich, stratified, turbulent flows ; 30 (2) an absence of distributaries in a lobate deposit is interpreted to result from collapse of mud31 poor, turbulent flows remobilized from littoral drift; and (3) a lobate deposit with only a few, 32 long, straight distributaries without avulsions is interpreted to be dominated by debris flows 33 (laminar flows) . Reconciling 3D seismic morphologies with observations of channels, scours, 34 and amalgamation zones in outcrops is problematic. It is concluded from this study that, when 35 characterizing unconfined deep water deposits, multiple models with significant differences in 36 predicted permeability structure should be considered. 37

[1]  P. Dartnell,et al.  The Tectonically Controlled San Gabriel Channel–Lobe Transition Zone, Catalina Basin, Southern California Borderland , 2018, Journal of Sedimentary Research.

[2]  P. Haughton,et al.  Variable character and diverse origin of hybrid event beds in a sandy submarine fan system, Pennsylvanian Ross Sandstone Formation, western Ireland , 2018 .

[3]  J. Eggenhuisen,et al.  The stratigraphic record and processes of turbidity current transformation across deep‐marine lobes , 2017 .

[4]  B. Dennielou,et al.  Controls on turbidite sedimentation: Insights from a quantitative approach of submarine channel and lobe architecture (Late Quaternary Congo Fan) , 2016 .

[5]  D. Jennette,et al.  Lateral juxtapositions of channel and lobe elements in distributive submarine fans: Three-dimensional outcrop study of the Ross Sandstone and geometric model , 2014 .

[6]  R. Gawthorpe,et al.  Salt tectonic controls on deep‐water turbidite depositional systems: Miocene, southwestern Lower Congo Basin, offshore Angola , 2014 .

[7]  D. Caress,et al.  Deep‐sea channel evolution and stratigraphic architecture from inception to abandonment from high‐resolution Autonomous Underwater Vehicle surveys offshore central California , 2013 .

[8]  Pom-yong Choi,et al.  Distal turbidite fan/lobe succession of The Late Paleozoic Taean Formation, Western Korea , 2013, Geosciences Journal.

[9]  D. Hodgson,et al.  The full range of turbidite bed thickness patterns in submarine lobes: controls and implications , 2013, Journal of the Geological Society.

[10]  K. Straub,et al.  Quantifying the Hierarchical Organization of Compensation in Submarine Fans Using Surface Statistics , 2012 .

[11]  J. Peakall,et al.  Sedimentation in deep-sea lobe-elements: implications for the origin of thickening-upward sequences , 2011, Journal of the Geological Society.

[12]  A. Fildani,et al.  Intrinsic controls on the range of volumes, morphologies, and dimensions of submarine lobes , 2010 .

[13]  T. Mulder,et al.  Lobes in deep-sea turbidite systems: State of the art , 2010 .

[14]  Y. L. Gonidec,et al.  Lobe construction and sand/mud segregation by turbidity currents and debris flows on the western Nile deep-sea fan (Eastern Mediterranean) , 2010 .

[15]  A. Fildani,et al.  A Test of Initiation of Submarine Leveed Channels by Deposition Alone , 2010 .

[16]  G. Shanmugam,et al.  Sandy Debrites and Tidalites of Pliocene Reservoir Sands in Upper-Slope Canyon Environments, Offshore Krishna–Godavari Basin (India): Implications , 2009 .

[17]  Robert Parry,et al.  Exhibition , 2007, Microprocess. Microsystems.

[18]  B. E. Prather,et al.  Controls on reservoir distribution, architecture and stratigraphic trapping in slope settings , 2003, Regional Geology and Tectonics: Principles of Geologic Analysis.

[19]  Henry W. Posamentier,et al.  Seismic Geomorphology and Stratigraphy of Depositional Elements in Deep-Water Settings , 2003 .

[20]  B. E. Prather,et al.  Calibration and visualization of depositional process models for above-grade slopes: a case study from the Gulf of Mexico , 2000 .

[21]  M. Richards,et al.  Turbidite Systems in Deep-Water Basin Margins Classified by Grain Size and Feeder System , 1994 .

[22]  R. Walker.  Deep-Water Sandstone Facies and Ancient Submarine Fans: Models for Exploration for Stratigraphic Traps , 1979 .

[23]  W. Normark.  Fan Valleys, Channels, and Depositional Lobes on Modern Submarine Fans: Characters for Recognition of Sandy Turbidite Environments , 1978 .

[24]  W. Normark.  Growth Patterns of Deep-Sea Fans , 1970 .

[25]  B. Shi,et al.  Non-peer reviewed preprint submitted to EarthArXiv , 2021 .

[26]  Jae Woo Kim,et al.  Pliocene basin-floor fan sedimentation in the Bay of Bengal (offshore northwest Myanmar) , 2014 .

[27]  Z. Sylvester,et al.  Stratigraphic Response to Evolving Geomorphology in a Submarine Apron Perched On the Upper Niger Delta Slope , 2012 .

[28]  R. Wynn,et al.  Applications of the Principles of Seismic Geomorphology to Continental-slope and Base-of-slope Systems: Case studies from seafloor and near-seafloor analogues , 2012 .

[29]  L. Wood,et al.  Seismic Imaging of Depositional and Geomorphic Systems , 2010 .

[30]  C. Nelson,et al.  The Influence of External Processes on the Holocene Evolution of the Mississippi Fan , 2009 .

[31]  M. Cacas,et al.  Submarine Canyons in the Bathtub , 2005 .

[32]  A. Saller,et al.  Linked lowstand delta to basin-floor fan deposition, offshore Indonesia: An analog for deep-water reservoir systems , 2004 .

[33]  Paulo Johann,et al.  Reservoir Geophysics: Seismic Pattern Recognition Applied to Ultra-Deepwater Oilfield in Campos Basin, Offshore Brazil , 2001 .

[34]  S. J. Friedmann,et al.  Equilibrium Profile and Baselevel in Submarine Channels: Examples from Late Pleistocene Systems and Implications for the Architecture of Deepwater Reservoirs , 2000 .

[35]  R. Walker,et al.  Upper Carboniferous Deep Water Sediments, Western Ireland: Analogues for Passive Margin Turbidite Plays , 2000 .

[36]  J. Coleman,et al.  Deep-water reservoirs of the world , 2000 .

[37]  Gerald D. Kidd,et al.  Fundamentals of 3-D seismic volume visualization , 1999 .

[38]  C. D. Jenkins,et al.  Reservoir Scale Sandbody Architecture of Pliocene Turbidite Sequences, Long Beach Unit, Wilmington Oil Field, California , 1993 .

[39]  W. Ryan,et al.  Evolution of a Fan Channel on the Surface of the Outer Mississippi Fan: Evidence from Side-Looking Sonar , 1991 .

[40]  M. Link,et al.  Seismic facies and sedimentary processes of submarine fans and turbidite systems , 1991 .

[41]  D. Stow.  Deep-sea clastics: where are we and where are we going? , 1985, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.