The role of joint actions in the performance of IT clusters in Mexico

Purpose – The purpose of this article is to show the importance of joint actions and institutions for collaboration (IFCs) in the development and performance of information technology (IT) business clusters in the context of Mexico. Design/methodology/approach – A review of the literature suggests the types of linkages that the clusters must develop to be successful in the context of emerging countries. Two IT clusters in the region of Puebla and Jalisco are compared to highlight the factors that differentiate successful and less successful clusters in this type of environment. Findings – The presence of an IFC, such as the Jalisco Institute of Information Technology in Jalisco, is a determinant factor of the performance of the IT cluster there, contrary to Puebla. A model of dynamic interactions in clusters is proposed as a result of the analysis of the two cases. Research limitations/implications – Our analysis included clusters from IT industry in Mexico. It needs to be extended to more clusters, more ...

[1]  M. Storper The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Years Later , 1995 .

[2]  Faheem Islam Socioeconomy of innovation and entrepreneurship in a cluster of SMEs in emerging economies , 2010 .

[3]  Beatriz Junquera,et al.  Why are clusters beneficial? A review of the literature , 2010 .

[4]  M. Porter Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy , 2000 .

[5]  R. Martin,et al.  Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? , 2003 .

[6]  Dimitrios Tsagdis,et al.  Is There Evidence to Support Porter-type Cluster Policies? , 2007 .

[7]  Max-Peter Menzel,et al.  Cluster life cycles—dimensions and rationales of cluster evolution , 2010 .

[8]  Paola Perez-Aleman CLUSTER formation, institutions and learning: the emergence of clusters and development in Chile , 2005 .

[9]  M. Bell,et al.  Knowledge Systems and Technological Dynamism in Industrial Clusters in Developing Countries , 1999 .

[10]  James Simmie,et al.  Innovative clusters: global or local linkages? , 1999, National Institute Economic Review.

[11]  Alexandra Waluszewski,et al.  A competing or co-operating cluster or seven decades of combinatory resources? What's behind a prospering biotech valley? $ , 2004 .

[12]  R. Comunian,et al.  Enabling and Inhibiting the Creative Economy: The Role of the Local and Regional Dimensions in England , 2010 .

[13]  Luiz Cesar Ribeiro Carpinetti,et al.  Institutions for collaboration in industrial clusters: proposal of a per-formance and change management model , 2013 .

[14]  H. Schmitz Global Competition and Local Cooperation: Success and Failure in the Sinos Valley, Brazil , 1999 .

[15]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[16]  Joakim Wincent,et al.  When a new industry meets traditional and declining ones : An integrative approach towards dialectics and social movement theory in a model of regional industry emergence processes , 2010 .

[17]  J. Humphrey Upgrading in Global Value Chains , 2004 .

[18]  Anders Waxell,et al.  Guilty by Association: A Cross-industrial Approach to Sourcing Complementary Knowledge in the Uppsala Biotechnology Cluster , 2009 .

[19]  E. Giuliani,et al.  Upgrading in Global Value Chains: Lessons from Latin American Clusters , 2005 .

[20]  M. Aoki Endogenizing institutions and institutional changes* , 2007, Journal of Institutional Economics.

[21]  Khalid Nadvi,et al.  Clustering and Industrialization: Introduction , 1999 .

[22]  C. Oliver The Antecedents of Deinstitutionalization , 1992 .

[23]  T. Khanna,et al.  Strategies that fit emerging markets. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[24]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  ‘Old Economy’ Inputs for ‘New Economy’ Outcomes: Cluster Formation in the New Silicon Valleys , 2001 .

[25]  César Camisón,et al.  Knowledge creation and absorptive capacity: The effect of intra-district shared competences , 2011 .

[26]  Maria Bengtsson,et al.  Climate of competition, clusters and innovative performance , 2004 .

[27]  H. Lundberg Strategic networks for increased regional competitiveness: two Swedish cases , 2010 .

[28]  Brian Nicholson,et al.  Deinstitutionalization in the context of software exports policymaking in Costa Rica , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[29]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[30]  F. Malerba,et al.  The Geography of Innovation and Economic Clustering: Some Introductory Notes , 2001 .

[31]  Tilman Altenburg,et al.  How to Promote Clusters: Policy Experiences from Latin America , 1999 .

[32]  Gabi Dei Ottati,et al.  Cooperation and competition in the industrial district as an organization model , 1994 .

[33]  Luiz Mesquita,et al.  Starting Over when the Bickering Never Ends: Rebuilding Aggregate Trust Among Clustered Firms Through Trust Facilitators , 2007 .

[34]  M. Dwivedi,et al.  NATURE OF TRUST IN SMALL FIRM CLUSTERS , 2003 .

[35]  M. Porter Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[36]  Roberta Rabellotti,et al.  Recovery of a Mexican Cluster: Devaluation Bonanza or Collective Efficiency? , 1999 .

[37]  Kenichiro Chinen,et al.  Trust, learning and a firm's involvement in industrial clusters: a conceptual framework , 2012 .

[38]  D. North,et al.  Economic performance through time , 2012 .

[39]  Geoffrey M. Hodgson,et al.  The Institutions , 2018, The Popular Arts.

[40]  César Camisón,et al.  Shared, Competitive, and Comparative Advantages: A Competence-Based View of Industrial-District Competitiveness , 2004 .

[41]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage , 2004 .

[42]  Grant Miles,et al.  Strategic development of network clusters , 2008 .

[43]  Zsuzsanna Vincze,et al.  How clusters evolve , 2012 .

[44]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[45]  Diego Rinallo,et al.  Exploring the Knowledge Strategies of Temporary Cluster Organizers: A Longitudinal Study of the EU Fabric Industry Trade Shows (1986–2006) , 2011 .

[46]  M. Porter,et al.  Institutions for Collaboration: Overview , 2003 .