Exploring the Effectiveness of Social Capabilities and Goal Alignment in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning

In this study, we describe a conversational agent designed to support collaborative learning interactions between pairs of students We describe a study in which we independently manipulate the social capability and goal alignment of the agent in order to investigate the impact on student learning outcomes and student perceptions Our results show a significant interaction effect between the two independent variables on student learning outcomes While there are only a few perceived differences related to student satisfaction and tutor performance as evidenced in the questionnaire data, we observe significant differences in student conversational behavior, which offer tentative explanations for the learning outcomes we will investigate in subsequent work.

[1]  Michael J. Paul,et al.  Cross-Cultural Analysis of Blogs and Forums with Mixed-Collection Topic Models , 2009, EMNLP.

[2]  Noah A. Smith,et al.  Predicting Response to Political Blog Posts with Topic Models , 2009, NAACL.

[3]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment , 1997, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[4]  F. Fischer,et al.  A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Syntactic alignment between computers and people: The role of belief about mental states , 2003 .

[6]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[7]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Effects of Humor in Task-Oriented Human-Computer Interaction and Computer-Mediated Communication: A Direct Test of SRCT Theory , 1999, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[8]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  It's Not Easy Being Green: Supporting Collaborative "Green Design" Learning , 2008, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[9]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Helper agent: designing an assistant for human-human interaction in a virtual meeting space , 2000, CHI.

[10]  Ning Wang,et al.  The Politeness Effect in an Intelligent Foreign Language Tutoring System , 2008, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[11]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Tutorial Dialogue as Adaptive Collaborative Learning Support , 2007, AIED.

[12]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  The effect of roles on computer-supported collaborative learning. , 2004 .

[14]  Ryuichiro Higashinaka,et al.  Effects of self-disclosure and empathy in human-computer dialogue , 2008, 2008 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop.

[15]  Jiang Hu,et al.  Adaptive language behavior in HCI: how expectations and beliefs about a system affect users' word choice , 2006, CHI.

[16]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[17]  C.D. Martin,et al.  The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places [Book Review] , 1997, IEEE Spectrum.

[18]  F. Fischer,et al.  Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis , 2006 .

[19]  Michael J. Paul,et al.  Topic Modeling of Research Fields: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 2009, RANLP.