Using upper boundary constraints to quantify competitive response of desert annuals

Using a target-neighborhood approach with six annual dicot species in the Negev Desert of Israel, we tested whether neighborhood biomass constrained the upper limit of plant performance and if the slope of the upper boundary was correlated to species trait means, such as relative growth rate (RGR) and seed mass. Target individuals were measured in early spring and then collected at the onset of the dry season along with all naturally occurring neighbors within a 5-cm radius of the target. Using a minimum of 50 samples for each of the six target species, we found no significant relationships between target performance and either density or aboveground biomass of neighbors, when including all target individuals in the regressions. However, aboveground neighbor biomass did influence the maximum potential size of targets, When regressions were restricted to the largest target plant within classes of neighbor biomass, significant negative relationships were found for all six species, with neighbor biomass explaining 55 to 94% of the variance in maximum target biomass, The slopes of the regressions were used as an index of competitive response. The correlations between competitive response and estimates of species traits were not significant with the possible exception that species with lower RGR max may be better response competitors (i.e. were less sensitive to competition). These findings indicate the usefulness of the boundary regression technique for describing competitive interactions among neighbors, particularly in low productivity environments.

[1]  D. L. Venable,et al.  Competition in Two Species of Desert Annuals Along a Topographic Gradient , 1993 .

[2]  Ariel Novoplansky,et al.  On the relative importance of competition in unproductive environments , 1997 .

[3]  F. Berendse,et al.  Competition and nutrient availability in heathland and grassland ecosystems , 1990 .

[4]  D. Goldberg,et al.  Equivalence of competitors in plant communities: a null hypothesis and a field experimental approach. , 1983 .

[5]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants , 1980 .

[6]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments , 1993 .

[7]  R. Kadmon,et al.  COMPETITION IN A VARIABLE ENVIRONMENT: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY IN A DESERT ANNUAL PLANT POPULATION , 1990 .

[8]  C. H. Muller THE ASSOCIATION OF DESERT ANNUALS WITH SHRUBS , 1953 .

[9]  I. Noy-Meir,et al.  Desert Ecosystems: Environment and Producers , 1973 .

[10]  James B. Grace,et al.  Perspectives on Plant Competition , 1991 .

[11]  C. Holzapfel,et al.  BIDIRECTIONAL FACILITATION AND INTERFERENCE BETWEEN SHRUBS AND ANNUALS IN THE MOJAVE DESERT , 1999 .

[12]  K. Landa,et al.  Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition , 1991 .

[13]  Joe N. Perry,et al.  A method of estimating the slope of upper bounds of plots of body size and abundance in natural animal assemblages , 1992 .

[14]  John R. Jones,et al.  Statistical Models for Limiting Nutrient Relations in Inland Waters , 1994 .

[15]  J. Gurevitch Competition and the Local Distribution of the Grass Stipa Neomexicana , 1986 .

[16]  H. Lambers,et al.  Inherent Variation in Growth Rate Between Higher Plants: A Search for Physiological Causes and Ecological Consequences , 1992 .

[17]  Norma L. Fowler,et al.  The Role of Competition in Plant Communities in Arid and Semiarid Regions , 1986 .

[18]  Deborah E. Goldberg,et al.  NEIGHBORHOOD COMPETITION IN AN OLD-FIELD PLANT COMMUNITY' , 1987 .

[19]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Relative growth-rate: its range and adaptive significance in a local flora. , 1975 .

[20]  Peter Haase,et al.  Facilitation between Higher Plant Species in a Semiarid Environment , 1996 .

[21]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[22]  M. Zohary Vegetation of Israel and adjacent areas , 1982 .

[23]  Francis Juanes,et al.  INFERRING ECOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS FROM THE EDGES OF SCATTER DIAGRAMS: COMPARISON OF REGRESSION TECHNIQUES , 1998 .

[24]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Untangling Multiple Factors in Spatial Distributions: Lilies, Gophers, and Rocks , 1996 .

[25]  James H. Brown,et al.  Using constraint lines to characterize plant performance , 1998 .